Rewriting Evolution ~ Darwin was wrong

[Drew_Ali]

@The True Flesh........

Thank you...........

Again......

The article illustrates that what was once known as tree of life.......

Has failed to describe the origins of life.........

except evolution does not deal with the origin of life

LOL......

It does however state that one species evolved into many...........

NO???????

@Oceanic......

*crickets chirping*

 

[ohhhla]

Seriously, are these posters trolling? please tell me they trolling!

If not they're literally that dumb that they read the OP and page after page of the thread and still think the threadstarter is claiming/has claimed that "evolution" as a whole is "false"

Am I really the only one who understands what this thread is about?

Why does everybody think this has something to do with religion?

Imma break it down real quickly for the remedial:

Obviously things evolve adapt and mutate.

Only dumb religious people say "evolution is a lie"

.......what they mean to say is:

Evolutionary theories (Darwin's or any others) have proposed that every living thing has a common ancestor, however they haven't been able to prove it nor will they ever prove it.

NOW!

With absolutely no religious bias, scientists have discovered that Darwin's tree of life theory is incorrect, thus making it even harder to substantiate claims of all living things having a common ancestor.

The FACT that this is a STRICTLY SECULAR development in biological science is what makes it a HUGE lauce for the anti-creationists.

But a common ancestory is not a lie

 

[Drew_Ali]

 

[ohhhla]

Seriously, are these posters trolling? please tell me they trolling!

If not they're literally that dumb that they read the OP and page after page of the thread and still think the threadstarter is claiming/has claimed that "evolution" as a whole is "false"

Am I really the only one who understands what this thread is about?

Why does everybody think this has something to do with religion?

Imma break it down real quickly for the remedial:

Obviously things evolve adapt and mutate.

Only dumb religious people say "evolution is a lie"

.......what they mean to say is:

Evolutionary theories (Darwin's or any others) have proposed that every living thing has a common ancestor, however they haven't been able to prove it nor will they ever prove it.

NOW!

With absolutely no religious bias, scientists have discovered that Darwin's tree of life theory is incorrect, thus making it even harder to substantiate claims of all living things having a common ancestor.

The FACT that this is a STRICTLY SECULAR development in biological science is what makes it a HUGE lauce for the anti-creationists.

You just committing a false dichotomy.

If Evolution is to be proven false, it still doesn't prove creationism.

It isn't a lauce at all.

Creationism for the 35060686048904964 times isn't even a model.

 

[Drew_Ali]

Seriously, are these posters trolling? please tell me they trolling!

If not they're literally that dumb that they read the OP and page after page of the thread and still think the threadstarter is claiming/has claimed that "evolution" as a whole is "false"

Am I really the only one who understands what this thread is about?

Why does everybody think this has something to do with religion?

Imma break it down real quickly for the remedial:

Obviously things evolve adapt and mutate.

Only dumb religious people say "evolution is a lie"

.......what they mean to say is:

Evolutionary theories (Darwin's or any others) have proposed that every living thing has a common ancestor, however they haven't been able to prove it nor will they ever prove it.

NOW!

With absolutely no religious bias, scientists have discovered that Darwin's tree of life theory is incorrect, thus making it even harder to substantiate claims of all living things having a common ancestor.

The FACT that this is a STRICTLY SECULAR development in biological science is what makes it a HUGE lauce for the anti-creationists.

It isn't a lauce at all.

Creationism for the 35060686048904964 times isn't even a model.

Loose translation = Lauce..............

 

[Jabu_Rule]

@kai

Do yall ban niggas for excessive flagging???????

cause this nigga @FuriousOne........

Is out of control.......

Wacking scriptures......

Have you no shame nigga????????

So you falsely accused me of begging for your downfall but you over here doing the same thing. Lol. Cornball ass nigga. The flagging shall continue.

I got 5 troll flags and they are all by the same dude. Don't cast stones faggot.

 

[Jabu_Rule]

I guess this post will make 7. That's a lucky number.

Edit: oh, you not trying to bless the God?

 

[Drew_Ali]

Without [the tree concept] the theory of evolution would never have happened.

Because

The tree-of-life concept was absolutely central to Darwin's thinking

In other words, had Darwin not come up with the tree of life metaphor, he might not have been able to explain his theory of evolution. The metaphor was central to his theory.

Today, we know more about evolution so we can afford to replace the concept with a more accurate depiction of how evolution works.

Again, the article does not say evolution is false.

Again......

The article illustrates that what was once known as tree of life.......

Has failed to describe the origins of life.........

A better way to describe them is as a tangled web..........

Which eliminates "common ancestors"......

Thusly..........

Debunking the theory that one species evolved into many...............

omg, this thread has been presented to you by: when morons misunderstand

for the millionth time, illustrating it as a tree is misleading, it is much more like a web, intricately connected. there's no linear common ancestor path, it branches off. basically we have to rewrite how we explain the evolutionary past. nowhere at all does any of the stuff you posted negate the theory of evolution itself, and that's super obvious.

you are just mistaken

@kai

I missed this one in the midst of all of @FuriousOne's trolling.......

It is never good for a debate to fall into the realms of name calling.......

This thread is actually presented to you by Allah.............

Through me and the research of many evolutionary scientists.........

You can interpret the material however you like.........

However......

The research shows.......

A web without "common ancestors".........

The tree-of-life concept was absolutely central to Darwin's thinking, equal in importance to natural to natural selection, according to biologist W. Ford Doolittle of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Without it the theory of evolution would never have happened. The tree also helped carry the day for evolution. Darwin argued successfully that the tree of life was a fact of nature, plain for all to see though in need of explanation. The explanation he came up with was evolution by natural selection. ...

 

[Drew_Ali]

The irony of this faggot @FuriousOne accusing me of "polluting threads"..........

 

[Jabu_Rule]

The irony of this faggot @FuriousOne accusing me of "polluting threads"..........

I thought you weren't into name calling? Remember, I said all that after your downfall. I was analyzing your retarded ways which led to your ban. You're polluting this site with this repetitive nonsense. How many times you gonna make this topic? Ol re re, rerun ass nigga.

 

[Drew_Ali]

Yeah but you all in my thread tho' nigga.........

Go make your own shit..........

Ohhhh

I forgot.......

You get ethered every-time you make a wack thread.................

Run along lil' nigga.................

 

[Jabu_Rule]

Yeah but you all in my thread tho' nigga.........

Go make your own shit..........

Ohhhh

I forgot.......

You get ethered every-time you make a wack thread.................

Run along lil' nigga.................

Nah, i get a stalker uping threads i gave no fucks about begging for attention. But i see your one trick pony doing numbers. Congratulations.

 

[Drew_Ali]

Seriously, are these posters trolling? please tell me they trolling!

If not they're literally that dumb that they read the OP and page after page of the thread and still think the threadstarter is claiming/has claimed that "evolution" as a whole is "false"

Am I really the only one who understands what this thread is about?

Why does everybody think this has something to do with religion?

Imma break it down real quickly for the remedial:

Obviously things evolve adapt and mutate.

Only dumb religious people say "evolution is a lie"

.......what they mean to say is:

Evolutionary theories (Darwin's or any others) have proposed that every living thing has a common ancestor, however they haven't been able to prove it nor will they ever prove it.

NOW!

With absolutely no religious bias, scientists have discovered that Darwin's tree of life theory is incorrect, thus making it even harder to substantiate claims of all living things having a common ancestor.

The FACT that this is a STRICTLY SECULAR development in biological science is what makes it a HUGE lauce for the anti-creationists.

@ohhhla ...... Et.al

I have no intentions of indoctrinating anyone into my "religion" or belief system.......

Again.....

This thread was created for scientific discussion

 

[DMTxTHC]

Sean Price be going off b..

 

[Neophyte Wolfgang]

60 years from now people will laugh at all the scientific dogmas that we use to believe
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/02/...should-be-questioned-to-assist-our-evolution/

 

[Drew_Ali]

60 years from now people will laugh at all the scientific dogmas that we use to believe
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/02/...should-be-questioned-to-assist-our-evolution/

Evolution is on the list.............

 

[Bodhi]

@Oceanic......

*crickets chirping*

I apologize for the delayed response; I'm not here 24/7.

You have yet to find the example of where your article states that the common ancestor theory is out the window. As I've stated, the tree of life as a concept has been proposed to be discarded and then replaced with the web to more accurately explain how evolution occurs.

Darwin assumed that descent was exclusively "vertical", with organisms passing

traits down to their offspring. But what if species also routinely

swapped genetic material with other species, or hybridised with

them? Then that neat branching pattern would quickly degenerate into

an impenetrable thicket of interrelatedness, with species being

closely related in some respects but not others.

We now know that this is exactly what happens. As more and more

genes were sequenced, it became clear that the patterns of

relatedness could only be explained if bacteria and archaea were

routinely swapping genetic material with other species--often

across huge taxonomic distances--in a process called horizontal

gene transfer (HGT).
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

 

[Bodhi]

This thread is actually presented to you by Allah.............

Through me and the research of many evolutionary scientists.........

 

[ohhhla]

Niggas who believe evolution is a myth are fundamentalist

Hindu and Muslim or people who don't care for it

 

[Bodhi]

If not they're literally that dumb that they read the OP and page after page of the thread and still think the threadstarter is claiming/has claimed that "evolution" as a whole is "false"

Am I really the only one who understands what this thread is about?

Did you not read the OP???

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

Obviously things evolve adapt and mutate.

^^^ .. including genes, which is the cause of speciation.