Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Ladiesman;2211616 said:
Know one gives a damn about Zulu Dawn though
well, that actually happens to be true, but it is what it is

Ladiesman;2211630 said:
I've been living in Britain for a while and that's the way the people there see it, they see it as the British kicking the Zulu's ass
ultimately Zulu is about the military victory of British soldiers (from a largely Welsh regiment) defending themselves. but Baker, while wanting to commemorate the battle (because he was Welsh), also made a movie that:

-references the Zulu beating the shit out of the British at Isandlwana;

-references the fact that British characters who think the Zulu couldn't fight or anything along those lines were fucking stupid;

-has a "victory" that is surviving attack by a military force that was far superior

it was also a battle that Cetshwayo didn't want to fight and that Dabulamanzi fucked up
 
Last edited:
kingblaze84;2212645 said:
The British are some of the most evil group of people ever created, I wouldn't take their opinion on anything too seriously.

If you look at history yep I would agree with you fully
 
Last edited:
janklow;2213111 said:
well, that actually happens to be true, but it is what it is

ultimately Zulu is about the military victory of British soldiers (from a largely Welsh regiment) defending themselves. but Baker, while wanting to commemorate the battle (because he was Welsh), also made a movie that:

-references the Zulu beating the shit out of the British at Isandlwana;

-references the fact that British characters who think the Zulu couldn't fight or anything along those lines were fucking stupid;

-has a "victory" that is surviving attack by a military force that was far superior

it was also a battle that Cetshwayo didn't want to fight and that Dabulamanzi fucked up

Good point, but which film is promoted the most, alot of people don't even know that Zulu Dawn exists, or don't care
 
Last edited:
2012, with all due respect I cannot accept this article and base it on white privilege. It's not because I cannot accept it, it's because the article is one sided. He grew up in "ONE OF THE WHITEST STATES IN THE COUNTRY", look at his neighborhood and city. It's ALL white. Now of course he's has WHITE privileges, what other is there? He hasn't had the chance to GROW UP in a state where it's divided with many races. This guy is a pure idiot as well, to state he has white privileges in one of the whitest states is just LOGIC not anything more. Also, be bases things on assumptions.

I am as white as white gets in this country. I am of northern European heritage and I was raised in North Dakota, one of the whitest states in the country. I grew up in a virtually all-white world surrounded by racism, both personal and institutional. Because I didn't live near a reservation, I didn't even have exposure to the state's only numerically significant non-white population, American Indians.

So he hasn't had to chance to even "mingle" with another race that's significant in numbers to his. That's pretty sheltered if you ask me, and makes sense that an all white state would be racist.

I have struggled to resist that racist training and the ongoing racism of my culture. I like to think I have changed, even though I routinely trip over the lingering effects of that internalized racism and the institutional racism around me. But no matter how much I "fix" myself, one thing never changes--I walk through the world with white privilege.

Being racist is why he thinks he has privileges. This honestly is a sense of falsehood, which he has no idea he's doing. You cannot honestly claim this man has white privileges in an all white state. If this man was in a state say, California and lived in LA, and wrote this article based on facts then sure, this article might have something but it doesn't.

What does that mean? Perhaps most importantly, when I seek admission to a university, apply for a job, or hunt for an apartment, I don't look threatening. Almost all of the people evaluating me for those things look like me--they are white. They see in me a reflection of themselves, and in a racist world that is an advantage. I smile. I am white. I am one of them. I am not dangerous. Even when I voice critical opinions, I am cut some slack. After all, I'm white.

Again, he racist, so of course he thinks these things and again, he's in an all white state. His STATE is pretty much racist.

That isn't meant as an insult to anyone, but is a simple observation that white privilege has meant that scores of second-rate white professors have slid through the system because their flaws were overlooked out of solidarity based on race, as well as on gender, class and ideology.

Simple OBSERVATION, which ISN'T FACTUAL. If he based this on numbers, a paper that was written and such then it could be taken more seriously. He's ASSUMING these things, based on his rasing in RACISM and train of thought being "privileged".

I am not a genius--as I like to say, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer ...I did not get where I am by merit alone.

Yes he did, if he had nothing then no matter how "white" this man is, he wouldn't have landed his job.

I benefited from, among other things, white privilege.

Of course he thinks this, he's racist in an all white state....gets repetitive.

That doesn't mean that I don't deserve my job, or that if I weren't white I would never have gotten the job. It means simply that all through my life, I have soaked up benefits for being white. I grew up in fertile farm country taken by force from non-white indigenous people.

So he's admitting that OTHER races, besides HIS OWN, CAN AND DO land these jobs. It had NOTHING to do with race but what his BACKGROUND is (record, education, etc)

I was educated in a well-funded, virtually all-white public school system in which I learned that white people like me made this country great. There I also was taught a variety of skills, including how to take standardized tests written by and for white people.

His state = well funded, which gives better education which = a better job. Everything else is just the racism you should expect from North Dakota.

All my life I have been hired for jobs by white people. I was accepted for graduate school by white people. And I was hired for a teaching position at the predominantly white University of Texas, which had a white president, in a college headed by a white dean and in a department with a white chairman that at the time had one non-white tenured professor...

I suppose you know what I am going to say? In an ALL WHITE STATE, expect this.

All I've learned from this is DON'T GO TO NORTH DAKOTA. Horrible article to base on white privileges. Give me an article from a man written where the numbers are mixed, not where the whites are the huge majority w/ hardly any contact w/ another race in large numbers.

My job, when I went for it a few years ago in Target, consisted of myself and many others. The room was full of people, black, mexican, asian, white etc. By the end of the week, the room was down to 5 new members for Target, I was one of them and so were two black people, 1 man and 1 woman. What I noticed is they carried themselves well, well dressed, as expected for a job interview and they got it. Where was the white privileges there? There were quite a few whites as well, but I noticed ONLY THE WELL DRESSED GOT THE JOB. I'm sure the way they carried themselves in the interview went their way too. So there isn't TRULY a white privilege, its about how you carry yourself.
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;2213868 said:
believe...I mean,

I just can not believe that you discounted simple mathematics, my friend, in order to discount the real racist society that Dr. Jensen has experienced just like you and me.

I mean unless of course you disagree that since Jensen was born in 1958, and left home at 17...it does then = 95% of that piece is about Life after North Dakota. Other than that, I suggest you put the Glenn Beck tactics back on the mantle, stop embarrassing yourself, and get to breaking that piece down in terms of the real society that you me and he, all live in.

Because I can hit you with some numbers, real numbers, which validate the concept and philosophy of everything he said...don't forget---------------The U.S. 2010 Census just came out, validating how wretch White-racism is alive and well!

So, simple mathematics is applicable when you want it to be, but you are a proponent for 2+2=5?
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;2214054 said:
FACT: never once have I ever said, 2+2≠4, as I only highlighted our submissive and obedient acceptance of 'whatever man told us' as long as he didn't attach the word 'God' to it.

FACT: you need to quit trolling, and cease addressing my posts unless you're going to add something or anything of substance, whatesoever, to the topic here

So, again its convenient to use "simple mathematics" when it applies to something you want it to, but when applied to something you disagree with its a matter of us "accepting whatever man told us"?
 
Last edited:
Ladiesman;2213433 said:
Good point, but which film is promoted the most, alot of people don't even know that Zulu Dawn exists, or don't care
i think it doesn't help that the two films are separated by many years and i think production companies/studios as well. and i think if i break it down, Zulu has more "star power" than Zulu Dawn. and Zulu gets promoted for unrelated reasons (it's often cited as an example of fire discipline in movies, for example)

meanwhile i watched Zulu Dawn a bunch of times when i was little, so i guess i'm not going to forget it. ultimately you could probably make a few good films out of these conflicts if you had a studio committed to it ... but that probably is not going to happen
 
Last edited:
H-Rap 180;2206665 said:
Whether of not the Willie Lynch letter is authentic dose not matter, the fact remains that thr principles within the letter are very much afraid.

The Cracker/House-nigga will distract you over the authenticity of the letter itself while ignoring the truths in the letter

The whites lack normal hue-man compassion and empathy which is why its so easy for them to destroy other cultures and commit acts of genocide against indigenous populations.

Of course the white devils will tell you: "Dude there was slavery everywhere" so you have to show them that every version of "slavery" was different.

The White-Europeon version of chattel slavery included these:

An 18 month ride chained in the bowels of a slave ship

Forced breeding practices, sexual slavery, rape, and sex-farms

Castration, humiliation, mutilation, branding, torture-devices, and lynching

The loss of your homeland, name, culture, language, religion. diet. morays,norms, and the right to seek knowledge

The slave was to work to his/her death as well as any children born to that slave.

Many whites dont like this History lesson and will seek to disrupt our learning, they would rather us celebrate Columbus day and Thanksgiving but will continue to learn and share our history because its important to understand the nature of our enemy.

Powerful post...

...and does janklow have issues with 2012? He's that difficult to debate/argue against that his posts must be deleted?
 
Last edited:
H-Rap 180;2209974 said:
Good eye.

There is so much psychological damage that still exists in us as a people, peep this science:

the movie shows the origin of the "Pimp"; the slavemaster would have a nicely dressed effeminized Negro assist him on the sex farms like a valet.

On the plantation the male slaves would watch hopelessly while the slave master would rape our women and the only solace they could suffice was to try to get our women to manipulate the slave master out of a piece of bread or an extra blanket....some slaves would even suggest to the slave master that he should rape a particular slave so they could con him together and keep him from raping the children.

By witnessing the ravaging of our women many males felt effeminized due to their inability to protect their women and many of these efffeminized men found a semblance of false manhood by pimping their women to the slave master....this sickness still exists and is promoted by many rap artists.

That's why pimp culture has always been men sporting long hair, long nails, bright colors....an effeminized male finding a False sense of manhood by treating our women as merchandise.

The fallout effects of 400 years of barbaric slavery has wrecked havoc on the pysche of our people Judah.

The shit runs deep......
 
Last edited:
Ladiesman;2205208 said:
Whites don't have the same low self esteem that black people have, where you have so many blacks guys killing each other in hoods, black people shunning their own race to date white women/ white men the amount of times I have spoke to black women and black men who refuse to date black women/men, iI don't see with as many white people, calling women hoes, straightening their noses, hair, blue eye contact lenses, lightening their skin to be white, you don't think this is part of low self esteem????

I'm 29, and talking about now not 1965, I'm going to school and all I hear is white history how Europeans dun this and that, I'm watching films and seeing the same thing. I'm not hearing about black history apart from slavery and then they never talk about slave rebellions. The first time I started reading about black history I was 20 years old and it made me feel proud of our achievements from the pyramids in Egypt, the powerful empires in Nigeria and Ghana to the slave rebeliions in the Americas, it's this kida of pride schools don't want to teach black children, and why should it be up to them it's down to the parents to do that for black children, schools in the US are bulit for white children. When i talk about white people I mean white people as a whole not indiviuals and you guys messing up the world

They dont teach uplifting black history in school, they dont want that. Shit, how many black parents teach their kids black history? Not many, they rely on the schools do that. I learned about black history(slavery, innovators, inventors) on my own. They'd have you believing we were just slaves.....
 
Last edited:
Here's some black history: Black people invented slavery and still practice it to this day.

And yes, it's the kind of chattel slavery where you are property for life and so are your children.
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;2217147 said:
Here's some black history: Black people invented slavery and still practice it to this day.

And yes, it's the kind of chattel slavery where you are property for life and so are your children.

There are slaves all over the world. Even the USA. I give white folk credit though, you guys perfected the slave trade. It's brutal efficiency has fucked up the minds of many Blacks up to this day, and it helped wipe out a native population in the Americas.

Props.
 
Last edited:
i plead with all my folks to find the long copy of Goodbye Uncle Tom

them youtube videos dont do the message justice

i found it on a torrent site,

either piratebay or kickass torrents
 
Last edited:
young law;2217345 said:
i plead with all my folks to find the long copy of Goodbye Uncle Tom

them youtube videos dont do the message justice

i found it on a torrent site,
either piratebay or kickass torrents

Here it is fam:

[video=google;3766149445318503265]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3766149445318503265#[/video]

kingblaze84;2217210 said:
There are slaves all over the world. Even the USA. I give white folk credit though, you guys perfected the slave trade. It's brutal efficiency has fucked up the minds of many Blacks up to this day, and it helped wipe out a native population in the Americas.

Props.

LOL Fam' didnt I tell you the peckerwoods argument???

The recessive, pig-skinned, reptilian, albino cave-mutant has a calcified pineal gland and Neaderthal in his DNA to go with his lack of melanin.

The whites lack normal hue-man compassion and empathy which is why its so easy for them to destroy other cultures and commit acts of genocide against indigenous populations.

Of course the white devils will tell you: "Dude there was slavery everywhere" so you have to show them that every version of "slavery" was different.

The White-Europeon version of chattel slavery included these:

An 18 month ride chained in the bowels of a slave ship

Forced breeding practices, sexual slavery, rape, and sex-farms
Castration, humiliation, mutilation, branding, torture-devices, and lynching
The loss of your homeland, name, culture, language, religion. diet. morays,norms, and the right to seek knowledge

The slave was to work to his/her death as well as any children born to that slave.


Many whites dont like this History lesson and will seek to disrupt our learning, they would rather us celebrate Columbus day and Thanksgiving but will continue to learn and share our history because its important to understand the nature of our enemy.
^^^^^^^^^^
 
Last edited:
aside from the boat ride, Africans invented all those torturous methods of slavery, practiced them for centuries, and still practice them today

the racist h-rap doesn't want you to know this
 
Last edited:
kingblaze84;2217210 said:
There are slaves all over the world. Even the USA. I give white folk credit though, you guys perfected the slave trade. It's brutal efficiency has fucked up the minds of many Blacks up to this day, and it helped wipe out a native population in the Americas.

Props.
Here is a video I found for you brother.

[video=youtube;ix6QBeohlvo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix6QBeohlvo&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/video]

[video=youtube;rtH5AhORzps]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtH5AhORzps&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/video]

The video shows some of the devices they used on our people.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
8,092
Views
1,922
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…