infamous114
Moderator
You're supposed to shoot center mass to neutralize the "threat". 2 shots to the head. Never had a chance.
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Police gun down 17 year old unarmed black teen. (Update) Darren Wilson Not Indicted
Matt-;7294639 said:"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body"
Not what the witness' implied
"One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said."
Eyewitness seemed to say he was hit several more times after the head shot. From a close range
Don't be redundant dude....complete the sentence in the first half of your post. I hate people like you who give half truth....
"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access."
Now compare the two
Rasta.;7294659 said:Matt-;7294639 said:"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body"
Not what the witness' implied
"One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said."
Eyewitness seemed to say he was hit several more times after the head shot. From a close range
Don't be redundant dude....complete the sentence in the first half of your post. I hate people like you who give half truth....
"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access."
Now compare the two
And there is an equal amount of chance that it was not on the clothing. So all that can be read into this report is that the shots were not fired from close proximity. And that that is subject to change. And it's also subject to no change
Matt-;7294664 said:Rasta.;7294659 said:Matt-;7294639 said:"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body"
Not what the witness' implied
"One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said."
Eyewitness seemed to say he was hit several more times after the head shot. From a close range
Don't be redundant dude....complete the sentence in the first half of your post. I hate people like you who give half truth....
"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access."
Now compare the two
And there is an equal amount of chance that it was not on the clothing. So all that can be read into this report is that the shots were not fired from close proximity. And that that is subject to change. And it's also subject to no change
No there isn't...regardless don't take shit out of context to support an opinion. You give the whole and let the people decide for themselves.
Breezy_Kilroy
New member
no shots anywhere near the lower extremities. he knew what he was doing
and they all damn near line up on the lateral side of his body. thats crazy
he must've took his time shooting
and they all damn near line up on the lateral side of his body. thats crazy
he must've took his time shooting
So he got shot in the head twice... I may not be an expert on getting shot in the head or anything but I'm going to call bullshit on the thought that he charged the police after after the first shot in the head... let alone the other body shots.
And that's if you want me to believe the absolute bullshit that is suggesting an unarmed teenager would charge an officer w/ his gun drawn over some damn cigarillos.
And that's if you want me to believe the absolute bullshit that is suggesting an unarmed teenager would charge an officer w/ his gun drawn over some damn cigarillos.
obnoxiouslyfresh
New member
I used to watch Dr. Michael Baden on HBO's autopsy as a teenager. I have always been fascinated with this man's work. He has taking forensic science to levels that are just unseen. It was this doctor who had the body of Medgar Evers exhumed. He is a bad muthafucka
infamous114
Moderator
Breezy_Kilroy;7294675 said:no shots anywhere near the lower extremities. he knew what he was doing
and they all damn near line up on the lateral side of his body. thats crazy
he must've took his time shooting
Cops aren't supposed to shoot in the lower extremities.
On another note, weren't witnesses saying he got shot in the back?
Rasta.;7294674 said:Matt-;7294664 said:Rasta.;7294659 said:Matt-;7294639 said:"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body"
Not what the witness' implied
"One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said."
Eyewitness seemed to say he was hit several more times after the head shot. From a close range
Don't be redundant dude....complete the sentence in the first half of your post. I hate people like you who give half truth....
"The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access."
Now compare the two
And there is an equal amount of chance that it was not on the clothing. So all that can be read into this report is that the shots were not fired from close proximity. And that that is subject to change. And it's also subject to no change
No there isn't...regardless don't take shit out of context to support an opinion. You give the whole and let the people decide for themselves.
I didn't take it out of context i posted what was known from the article, not what could potentially be known or unknown in any future articles
Chef_Taylor
New member
Rasta...stop going back'n forth with the troll.
Chef_Taylor
New member
Shit will hit the fan tomorrow or when ever the mass public find out about this autopsy report.
Breezy_Kilroy;7294675 said:no shots anywhere near the lower extremities. he knew what he was doing
and they all damn near line up on the lateral side of his body. thats crazy
he must've took his time shooting
Samething I was thinking..
From the NYT
If as Dr. Baden described, a bullet shattered Michael Brown's eye socket and then proceeded through his jaw into his collar bone, this suggests the shooter was above him shooting on a downward trajectory. Given his height is over 6 ft. Unless Darren Wilson is extremely tall, this is consistent with Mr. Brown being on his knees when shot and likely explains why the last bullet hit the top of his head. I can only describe this scenario as an execution.
If as Dr. Baden described, a bullet shattered Michael Brown's eye socket and then proceeded through his jaw into his collar bone, this suggests the shooter was above him shooting on a downward trajectory. Given his height is over 6 ft. Unless Darren Wilson is extremely tall, this is consistent with Mr. Brown being on his knees when shot and likely explains why the last bullet hit the top of his head. I can only describe this scenario as an execution.
Negro_Caesar
New member
Damn a least 6 times with 1 of the 6 causing at least 5 enter exit wounds. Who the fuck wouldn't surrender after that? I guarantee the shot to the top of the head was when he had his hands up
