1) SEXUAL ORIENTATION DOES NOT SIMPLY MEAN GAY OR STRAIGHT you gave me the dictionary definition which is incomplete and does not give adequate information, we have encyclopedias because dictionaries alone are insufficient to grap the a deeper understanding of certain things. SEXUAL ORIENTATION DOES NOT SIMPLY MEAN homosexual OR heterosexual. Which is why we have people calling themselves shit like pan-sexual, asexual, bisexual, andro-sexual, aromantic, demi-sexual, Objectum-sexual, Gyno-sexual even transgenderism falls under sexual orientation and transgenders don't have to be gay or straight. By trying to make this debate simply about being born homosexual or heterosexual what you are actually doing is creating a huge straw man.....THE ISSUE IS NOT whether OR NOT people are born homosexual or heterosexual the issue at hand in this debate is
Is sexual orientation determined at birth?
2) I am not disagreeing with you on the fact that some things are genetically hardwired however SEXUAL orientation is not one of those things. the pussy juice you drink must be addling you fucking mind. You proved that some people are pre-disposed to being alcoholics however you did not prove that people are pre-disposed to any sexual orientation. The burden of proof is on you
3) Even if people have certain feelings for your position to be correct you have to prove that they are born with those feelings and that they naturally develop over time. You also have to prove that they are not a result of anything experienced outside of the womb. ONCE again how are you going to prove this??? you are just making statements with no proof behind them. Listen hormones are not the reason some people are gay and even if they were hormonal reactions are dictated by genetics so it would still come back to genetics. which means there would have to be a gene for homosexuality, heterosexuality, bi-sexuality, demi-sexuality, Objectum-sexuality, etc etc etc ....... CAN YOU PROVE ANY OF THIS. The white man is a natural faggot not because he has a gene that makes him gay rather it's because European culture is fucking gay and white children often naturally adapt to this. is this adaption a result of genetics or hormonal imbalances??? we don't know.
I don't think people understand that when i say the white man is a natural faggot that it's a misnomer in other words it's an inaccurate description that's not necessarily wrong
The problem with what you are saying is that it's based on feelings AND feelings emotional or otherwise are horrible parameters to determine the Inborn CHARACTERISTICS of an individuals sexuality. Just because you have had homosexual or heterosexual feelings for as long as you can remember, does not mean you were born a homosexual or heterosexual. I have always liked to argue. I have always loved swimming. I have always hated dogs. I have always loved reading. i have always loved myself and beautiful women. But was I born with a desire to swim , kick dogs and fuck beautiful women???? I think so but i cannot prove it. FOR THE PURPOSES OF this debate I don't have to prove it you have to prove it. The point here is that what we desire in childhood is far more complex than the biological sciences can account for, and this goes for our sexual desires as well.
Now look i don't consider you to be a really stupid guy you're just a CUNT A PURE unadulterated CUNT but you are not stupid, it's not like i am debating bossexcellence so I am sure that you can see that your debating position is weak and it's really not worth all this back and forth so Perhaps you should just concede.