I don't see how it makes a difference if black wrestlers are ex-cons or talk like they're from the hood. The WWE has always pushed white trash/hill billy characters so why not push a dude that came from the hood? Collage education, imo means nothing in the world of wrestling unless it's actually being used as part of a gimmick. Collage education isn't something that imo, isn't even relatable to majority of wrestling's fan base as a whole either.
Even though he's collage educated, David Otonga's mike skills aren't better then MVP's, imo. Not to mention that he's probably the worst wrestler in Nexus. So, why did Otonga have a better spot in the company over MVP? Imo, it's because he represents a safe black image. MVP didn't. That's part of the same reason why the Rock was allowed to be as dominated as he was. In fact, the Rock wasn't even marketed as a black man. They always put more emphasis on his Samoan side over his black side. And I know some people might argue that he was in the nation of domination, but that was before he really blew up and became the people's champ.
And I just don't believe that the season why Booker T got shitted on was because he was being punished for being a Rock knock off. They made almost everyone that came over during the invasion angle into a bitch. DDP, Ryno, Tazz, etc. Him being black was probably just icing on the cake though.
And Booker T imo, even later on still wasn't truly credible. Even if a guy wins the Big one, but he always has to cheat or is helped by someone else in order to win, he's not truly a credible champion, imo.
Same thing with Eddie when he was champ.