So if a child gives you a rough description of a hand and says it's yours through coaching from parents and police does that mean you're the one that slapped him? Come on man, I'm not even saying MJ isn't guilty. But a lot of that shit that people were taking as fact turned out to be fiction and exaggeration. That's why his trial didn't go anywhere. They didn't have any solid facts. And again, two of those boys that described his penis recanted and one of them flat out said that it wasn't true and that his parents made him do it for the money.
And how does this "believing the victims" comment you're making even come in to play. We're not even talking about victim commentary. A independent 3rd party caught the incident in the Sandusky case. What do you people not understand about this? With MJ, there was a bunch of circumstantial and anecdotal evidence, much of which was found to be false at some point. With Sandusky there is an eye witness on top of the victims and a conspiracy for the hiding of the incident for years. You really don't understand the difference there?
