IC, what are your true personal thoughts on Muslims/Islam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
garv;2997920 said:
Maybe i worded it wrong, you can study the essential principles in Islam without being a practicing Muslim, why study a arabized version when you can study the original? You've already said in this thread that the principles found in Islam are not new, and were around before Muhammad, and for this i agree yet you still choose to immerse yourself in a arabized political version of doctrines that were borrowed from elsewhere.

LOL. I study many things Garv, I am not dogmatic or straight jacket in my thinking, my dude.

Arabized? I am smart enough duke to separate the wheat from the tare. You obviously have not studied the Quran even a little bit. There is nothing in that book that directs the reader pay homage to Arab culture or Arab political leanings. Show me one thing in there that suggest that and I will submit. It is a book of principles. You all need to start studying and quit listening to dudes who have axes to grind.

That is why there are whole Muslim Nations that are free from Arab cultural imperialism. The most populous Muslim nation on the Earth is Indonesia, you don't see Arab culture or politics manifested there.

Question who has been more successful in this modern era using those principles? Arabs or the Africans, Asians, or Europeans? Think very carefully. Leave all emotion and personal feeling out of it.

I study the successful man.
 
Last edited:
And Step;2997943 said:
LOL. I study many things Garv, I am not dogmatic or straight jacket in my thinking, my dude.

Arabized? I am smart enough duke to separate the wheat from the tare. You obviously have not studied the Quran even a little bit. There is nothing in that book that directs the reader pay homage to Arab culture or Arab political leanings. Show me one thing in there that suggest that and I will submit. It is a book of principles. You all need to start studying and quit listening to dudes who have axes to grind.

That is why there are whole Muslim Nations that are free from Arab cultural imperialism. The most populous Muslim nation on the Earth is Indonesia, you don't see Arab culture or politics manifested there.

Question who has been more successful in this modern era using those principles? Arabs or the Africans, Asians, or Europeans? Think very carefully. Leave all emotion and personal feeling out of it.

I study the successful man.

exactly and that works against ignorant people that claim Islam spread mostly by the sword. What Muslim army went there?
 
Last edited:
If you want sanction to commit all manner of crime [ and call it "waging war on infidel"] then be a Muslim.

If you want eternal life, then heed Jesus. It's that simple.
 
Last edited:
Ishaq:243 "I heard the Apostle say: 'Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!' He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks.... Allah sent down concerning him: 'To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom." [9:61] "Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, 'If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey's.'"

Tabari II:21 "Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham's descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem's, the latter would enslave them."

Tabari II:11 "Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African's color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks."

Tabari IX:69 "Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah's helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah's Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us

Ishaq:450 "It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah's army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent."

These are the ones I found. Didn't see quotes in hadith as previously thought
 
Last edited:
En-Fuego22;2999409 said:
Ishaq:243 "I heard the Apostle say: 'Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!' He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks.... Allah sent down concerning him: 'To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom." [9:61] "Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, 'If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey's.'"

Not the Quran.

Tabari II:21 "Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham's descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem's, the latter would enslave them."

Not the Quran. This is actually the Hamitic curse that was innovated by the Jewish Talmudic Scholars

Tabari II:11 "Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African's color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks."

Not the Quran. See the above

Tabari IX:69 "Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah's helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah's Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us

Not the Quran.

Ishaq:450 "It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah's army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent."

Not the Quran

These are the ones I found. Didn't see quotes in hadith as previously thought

C'mon son.

These are all Hadith. Not one is from the Quran. And I don't see one statement attributed to Muhammad. I would be pissed too if I saw this before knowledge.

There are some verses in the Quran that are controversial, but nothing like ascribing racism towards Blacks.
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2998028 said:
If you want sanction to commit all manner of crime [ and call it "waging war on infidel"] then be a Muslim.

I don't think your white murdering, slavemaster, colonizing, genocidal ancestors(Catholics and Protestants) who were murdering and colonizing Natives across the globe from West to East, in the name of Jesus, civilizing the "heathens" when they came out the caves and Dark Ages were Muslims. No one has killed more humans than White Christians in the last 4000 years.

If you want eternal life, then heed Jesus. It's that simple.

Sorry..tried the fake white Jesus...white Christians have been the servant of Satan....not Jesus. You are of your father the devil and the lust of your father you shall do. He was a liar and murderer from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
And Step;2997943 said:
LOL. I study many things Garv, I am not dogmatic or straight jacket in my thinking, my dude.

Arabized? I am smart enough duke to separate the wheat from the tare. You obviously have not studied the Quran even a little bit. There is nothing in that book that directs the reader pay homage to Arab culture or Arab political leanings. Show me one thing in there that suggest that and I will submit. It is a book of principles. You all need to start studying and quit listening to dudes who have axes to grind.

That is why there are whole Muslim Nations that are free from Arab cultural imperialism. The most populous Muslim nation on the Earth is Indonesia, you don't see Arab culture or politics manifested there.

Question who has been more successful in this modern era using those principles? Arabs or the Africans, Asians, or Europeans? Think very carefully. Leave all emotion and personal feeling out of it.

I study the successful man.

Well me personally i see no reason in dealing with filtered products when i can deal with something that is more organic, why would i study Islam when i come from a line of people who were here before Muhammed, who were here before Islam came about. Islam hasn't benefited Africa in no way, in fact it has partly contributed to its demise.
 
Last edited:
personally I would never study islam or any other religion. With that said i have no opinion on it.. What I Am sick of is ill informed people speaking on Africa(ns) role in the slave trade.

if your little google information or euro authored text books history doesn't go back before the invasions, or you cant read the hieroglyphs youre speaking on things you know nothing about.
 
Last edited:
garv;3000519 said:
Well me personally i see no reason in dealing with filtered products when i can deal with something that is more organic, why would i study Islam when i come from a line of people who were here before Muhammed, who were here before Islam came about. Islam hasn't benefited Africa in no way, in fact it has partly contributed to its demise.

What do you consider more organic Garv? What African tradition on the continent now would you consider organic with the hundreds upon hundred of tribal factions that have produced nothing but discord, confusion and unfettered access to Africa by outsiders? Nothing organic about that. Matter of fact, the glory days was actually African civilization in decline. This was before Arabs or Euros stepped foot on the continent.

Just because you were here before somebody does not necessarily make you superior particularly if you have accepted inferior or out of date knowledge. You can't look at men from a stagnated view point. Time moves on so do men, ideas, and human advancement.

Answer me this. If the demonstrated wisdom of Ancient KMT, The Nile Valley, and the Ancient Nubians were not enough to stop the invaders from decimating it, why would I go backwards to a civilization that was conquered by some babies, who now are more advanced than their ancestors were and think I can come back to power over them by utilizing all the precepts of that civilization? Take the best and leave the rest. There were some fundamental flaws in our past civilization that others exploited. We have seen every race come to Africa and learn and moved past us. They didn't take everything because somethings they couldn't use. Now here we are talking about we can't learn from somebody who advanced what we gave them. Come on now. You were not here before Islam came about. Islam came from you. You just don't know what you are looking at.
 
Last edited:
And Step;3000902 said:
What do you consider more organic Garv? What African tradition on the continent now would you consider organic with the hundreds upon hundred of tribal factions that have produced nothing but discord, confusion and unfettered access to Africa by outsiders? Nothing organic about that. Matter of fact, the glory days was actually African civilization in decline. This was before Arabs or Euros stepped foot on the continent.

Just because you were here before somebody does not necessarily make you superior particularly if you have accepted inferior or out of date knowledge. You can't look at men from a stagnated view point. Time moves on so do men, ideas, and human advancement.

Answer me this. If the demonstrated wisdom of Ancient KMT, The Nile Valley, and the Ancient Nubians were not enough to stop the invaders from decimating it, why would I go backwards to a civilization that was conquered by some babies, who now are more advanced than their ancestors were and think I can come back to power over them by utilizing all the precepts of that civilization? Take the best and leave the rest. There were some fundamental flaws in our past civilization that others exploited. We have seen every race come to Africa and learn and moved past us. They didn't take everything because somethings they couldn't use. Now here we are talking about we can't learn from somebody who advanced what we gave them. Come on now. You were not here before Islam came about. Islam came from you. You just don't know what you are looking at.

Most West African traditions i have read into sharemany of the same ideologies, they all originate from one place which is the Nile Valley Civilization, and you can find parallels in all of them, they are all more organic than the Christianity Islam and Judaism are brothers nowadays subscribe to, as a Yoruba man i look to Ifa before i look to Islam, because that is the offspring of my ancestors.

And we learn from those fundamental flaws and build upon it, it doesn't mean that we adopt another religion that is basically a filtered version of what we already have. Your argument makes no sense, you basically said that you wouldn't go backwards to a civilization because of the fact it was conquered by Europeans, then by your Arab Muslim friends. Yet you fail to acknowledge that by the time Europeans were taking West Africans as slaves, a large percentage of them had already converted to Islam, using that logic why do you still insist on following Islam? You refer to the likes of Mansa Musa, who ironically nearly bankrupt his nation during his pilgrimage to Mecca, yet fail to realize that like the Egyptians the time of Mansa Musa and Timbuktu have gone and past, and for all their grandeur there civilization paled in comparison with the ones on Nile Valley, that came thousands of years before. You seem to be concerned with just following whats en vogue, but lets establish something, Europeans and Arabs didn't gain power solely by being more intelligent and resourceful, they gained power by being bloodthirsty brutal and harsh. Is this what you want to follow? Afterall these are the people on top right now, yet you make one clear mistake in your argument, these people borrowed our doctrines and beliefs and modified it to suit their ways, as a African man i do not subscribe to their modified version i subscribe to the organic version, because it is this organic version that takes me back to a time when we ruled, Africans have done very little since we started adopting the religions of others.
 
Last edited:
C'mon son.

These are all Hadith. Not one is from the Quran. And I don't see one statement attributed to Muhammad. I would be pissed too if I saw this before knowledge.

There are some verses in the Quran that are controversial, but nothing like ascribing racism towards Blacks.

Ibn Ishaq and Imam Tabari are the islamic historians who attributed these to muhammad
 
Last edited:
melanated khemist;3000662 said:
personally I would never study islam or any other religion. With that said i have no opinion on it.. What I Am sick of is ill informed people speaking on Africa(ns) role in the slave trade.

if your little google information or euro authored text books history doesn't go back before] the invasions, or you cant read the hieroglyphs youre speaking on things you know nothing about.

So you can read the hieroglyphs? I got a question about that has it been correctly decipher by europeans or do you go by african people who can read?
 
Last edited:
And Step;2999683 said:
I don't think your white murdering, slavemaster, colonizing, genocidal ancestors(Catholics and Protestants) who were murdering and colonizing Natives across the globe from West to East, in the name of Jesus, civilizing the "heathens" when they came out the caves and Dark Ages were Muslims. No one has killed more humans than White Christians in the last 4000 years.

No evil deed was ever done due to guidance of the NT revealed Jesus Christ.

And Step;2999683 said:
Sorry..tried the fake white Jesus .........

Well there's your problem. Ya need to try the real Jesus.
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;3004448 said:
No evil deed was ever done due to guidance of the NT revealed Jesus Christ.

There is no way to prove this at all. Reason being any evil deed could have been done no matter how severe or minor since NT came about.. how would anyone know.
 
Last edited:
garv;3001162 said:
Most West African traditions i have read into sharemany of the same ideologies, they all originate from one place which is the Nile Valley Civilization, and you can find parallels in all of them, they are all more organic than the Christianity Islam and Judaism are brothers nowadays subscribe to, as a Yoruba man i look to Ifa before i look to Islam, because that is the offspring of my ancestors.

No. No. No. There were other civilizations beside Nile Valley, Garv. Blacks created civilizations in the Fertile Crescent, Holy Land, and the Nile Valley. The Ashanti culture mirrors almost identically the Hebrew customs. The Dogon tribe out of Mali has many traditions and customs that mirror those found in the Holy Land, their oral history says they migrATED eastward.

The mistakes you dudes make(Afrocentric scholars do this purposely because they don't want to acknowledge the Black Abrahamic traditions influence on Black civilization) is you falsely attribute Black civilization exclusively to the Nile Valley. Nothing could be further from the truth. We occupied the Holy Land, Fertile Crescent, and even South East Asia. Matter of fact, scientisit have now connected the Asian civilzations to Black ancestry out of East Africa. You can't say that West African is more organic when the truth is it descended from another place. Most West African are migrants from the Nile Valley, Fertile Crescent and Holy Land. These were the same people. Why do some scholars leave this out? Because they don't want any connection to "religion". But guess what doctor? The Ancinet Egyptians were very religious. Too much so. This was one of the reasons for their demise.

And we learn from those fundamental flaws and build upon it, it doesn't mean that we adopt another religion that is basically a filtered version of what we already have. Your argument makes no sense, you basically said that you wouldn't go backwards to a civilization because of the fact it was conquered by Europeans, then by your Arab Muslim friends.[

Actually I said Arab and Europeans. I made no distinction. And yes, warfare is part of nature. You have to be able to protect what you have. We let the Tamahu in and fell victim to their deceit of divide (Upper Egypt from Lower, in fact this started the conflict because those differed on their view of the invaders) and conquer. And please don't play that BS with me. My friends span many schools of thought. I am not an arab flunkie nor a european one. And no I won't go back. And who said what I have is filtered? It may be. Some people have different views on KMT, Islam, Egypt, etc. it is the application that determines if it filtered. I dont suscribe to no Arab viewpoint of Islam, which is silly point by the way because there is no monolithic view among them. Which Arabs are you talking about/ The ones who subscribe to Wahabism? Or the Ones who are Sunni? How about those affiliated with Al Qaeda who disagree with both. Or how about those like Qadaffi who apologized and acknowledged the Arab involvement in the slave trade and publicly acknowledged that Libya and all of Northern Africa belongs to Blacks and in his Green Book, said that Blacks will prevail in the world?

Yet you fail to acknowledge that by the time Europeans were taking West Africans as slaves, a large percentage of them had already converted to Islam, using that logic why do you still insist on following Islam? You refer to the likes of Mansa Musa, who ironically nearly bankrupt his nation during his pilgrimage to Mecca, yet fail to realize that like the Egyptians the time of Mansa Musa and Timbuktu have gone and past, and for all their grandeur there civilization paled in comparison with the ones on Nile Valley, that came thousands of years before.

I didn't fail to acknowledge it because it wasn't important to the discussion. You yourself know that in Western Africa that there is no large Arab presence. You admitted this. So your argument is bogus. Mansa Musa didn't bankrupt his nation. What he actually did was enrich other parts of Africa on his travel to Mecca. He recognize the importance of sharing wealth. You guys kill me making comparisons of the Nile Valley and other Black civilizations. Instead of celebrating them and recognizing them just being a link in the chain you like to degrade one and exalt the other. How very white of you. Most of you so-called Afrocentrics cause more division than white people with your nonsense religious gang banging. The Nile valley civilization interacted with the Civilizations of the Fertile Crescent(This was our people too) because game recognize game. They did not notice any of that bs you all spout.

You seem to be concerned with just following whats en vogue, but lets establish something, Europeans and Arabs didn't gain power solely by being more intelligent and resourceful, they gained power by being bloodthirsty brutal and harsh. Is this what you want to follow?

What am I a following? I take from all sources, homey. You on the other hand are stuck in the past of a civilization that has long gone and you have nothing but dogma and rhetoric. I do harm to no man. And Garv please Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt were killing each other way before European and Arabs hit the scene. Let's talk about that. You dudes see what you want to see and that is why those who hold onto their Ancient African Civilizations have made no progress in the way of those civilizations, because you are close minded, straight jacketed, and tunnel visioned. I can show you religious orders who are more true to the spirit of KMT, Egypt, and Nubia than a lot of you cats.

Africans have done very little since we started adopting the religions of others.

LOL. It is not other. It is ours. And sorry the invaders were more intelligent and resourceful. They studied you and used your own nature against you. They came at you with a plan that you had no clue of how to master. They forged the split between Upper and Lower Egypt.

Africa is infinitely more advanced than KMT, Egypt, or Nubia. Despite all of its problems. Let us not be silly. They got merked by a bunch of cave boys with with swords and shields. And I did acknowledge in my post that they borrowed our way. What you think I have been saying this whole exchange? And I respectfully say you don't have an organic version you have a watered down impotent version. If what you have is organic it wouldn't take you back it would move you forward. Regression is death. What living thing you know regresses and makes progress? Nothing. Nature doesn't work like that. Well, except for the butterfly and it cocoons itself and breaks all the way down only to build itself up but it doesn't maintain the old form, it builds into something new.

Oh by the way, My cousin who is in the NOI went to Nigeria and the Yoruba priest/king gave Minister Farrakhan a gift of his sword and two horses which is only done symbolically to transfer authority. He was not tripping over religion so why are you?
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;3004448 said:
No evil deed was ever done due to guidance of the NT revealed Jesus Christ.
(falling off my chair) Whuh? What the..?

Actually there was. Do you need me to post the NT scriptures that sanction slavery and the use of it by slavemasters to keep their Christian slaves in check? Many slave owners used it when they made their slaves preachers and told them what to preach out of the book. I can show you. Or I can post direct quotes from Europeans using the Bible NT and OT justifying their slaughter of Native Americans and enslavements of Africans.

Well there's your problem. Ya need to try the real Jesus.

Acually, I already have. You need to try the real one. I don't think he would be pleased with you calling him nigger and dissing his people like that.
 
Last edited:
En-Fuego22;3002203 said:
Ibn Ishaq and Imam Tabari are the islamic historians who attributed these to muhammad

C'mon son.

Here is what Imam Tabari said in his intro:
“Let the reader be aware that whatever I mention in my book is relied on the news that were narrated by some men. I had attributed these stories to their narrators, without inferring anything from their incidents …”"

So no he did not attribute those to Muhammad. He attributed those to the narrators.

So basically, you have a fourth party source relaying information from a third party source who admits that he hasn't had his information validated. Now keep in mind that Tabari was born 210 years after Muhammad. 210. 210.

I remember Phil Valentine saying Islam was started by the Catholic Church and his source was...are you ready for this......a fucking comic book!

SMH. Ghetto scholarship.....when will it end.
 
Last edited:
melanated khemist;3000662 said:
personally I would never study islam or any other religion. With that said i have no opinion on it.. What I Am sick of is ill informed people speaking on Africa(ns) role in the slave trade.

if your little google information or euro authored text books history doesn't go back before the invasions, or you cant read the hieroglyphs youre speaking on things you know nothing about.

What up Mel Khem? Have you ever checked out the Mende Script that they found on the Ancient Olmec artifacts? They had to go to Africa to get them to decipher it.
 
Last edited:
En-Fuego22;3002246 said:
So you can read the hieroglyphs? I got a question about that has it been correctly decipher by europeans or do you go by african people who can read?

So you can read the hieroglyphs?

Yes, ive been the head tour guide with small groups who were interested in the esoteric meanings.

im pretty well versed in tomb inscriptions, funerary beliefs, but the writings on their foreign expeditions gives me the confidence to say people don't know what they are talking about.

I got a question about that has it been correctly decipher by europeans or do you go by african people who can read?

personally i went by both, i dont actively study them now. wallis budge, sir alan gardiner, james p allen, r.o. faulkner have all been instrumental in my learning..

it wasnt until i started building relationships on the continent for the real understanding to manifest. I find that europeans are good at deciphering the alphabet and numbers and shit..But my interests lay in the hidden meanings which can be backed and verified by quantum mechanics/ physics.
 
Last edited:
And Step;3004898 said:
What up Mel Khem? Have you ever checked out the Mende Script that they found on the Ancient Olmec artifacts? They had to go to Africa to get them to decipher it.

Chilling God how you doing? No i haven't, ive come across the name but havent done any research on it.. if you can point me in the right direction so i can acquire some info

on it id appreciate it..
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
263
Views
1
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…