George Zimmerman Trial Thread (Found Not Guilty Jesus help us...)

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How many damn breaks are they gonna take? Jesus..

I haven't gotten the chance to watch anything today but did they ever say which time they were coming back?
 
CirocObama;6031824 said:
How many damn breaks are they gonna take? Jesus..

I haven't gotten the chance to watch anything today but did they ever say which time they were coming back?

Hell, west is workin that judges nerves, I'd need them breaks too. I bet she back there takin shots an shit like "this muthafucka got one more time"
 
CirocObama;6031824 said:
How many damn breaks are they gonna take? Jesus..

I haven't gotten the chance to watch anything today but did they ever say which time they were coming back?

They say 15 mins but it could be 30.
 
I do think the judge was biased concerning the texts.

The case law said that finding texts or images on a person's phone was sufficient for authentication; but she ignored this in favor of her own "a 7 year-old could do it" theory.
 
CirocObama;6031824 said:
How many damn breaks are they gonna take? Jesus..

I haven't gotten the chance to watch anything today but did they ever say which time they were coming back?

ask two or three questions, "ok , let's get lunch!"

 
obnoxiouslyfresh;6031865 said:
CirocObama;6031824 said:
How many damn breaks are they gonna take? Jesus..

I haven't gotten the chance to watch anything today but did they ever say which time they were coming back?

ask two or three questions, "ok , let's get lunch!"

Lol 4real. Ol' fat ass judge..

 
Last edited:
Man that hearing was hilarious.. lol that prosecutor is an asshole.. West was fuming.. dude sounded like his instagram daughter.. "REALLY!"
 
Last edited:
Pico Roscoe;6031888 said:
someone explain the murder 3 charge on child abuse?

Long story short, the prosecution threw that in there to kinda sorta guarantee that manslaughter gets added and it did.
 
Pico Roscoe;6031888 said:
someone explain the murder 3 charge on child abuse?
I think this is what they're going under:
The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated without any design to effect death, by a person engaged in the perpetration of, or in the attempt to perpetrate, any felony other than any:

(a) Trafficking offense prohibited by s. 893.135(1),

(b) Arson,

(c) Sexual battery,

(d) Robbery,

(e) Burglary,

(f) Kidnapping,

(g) Escape,

(h) Aggravated child abuse,

(i) Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult,

(j) Aircraft piracy,

(k) Unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb,

(l) Unlawful distribution of any substance controlled under s. 893.03(1), cocaine as described in s. 893.03(2)(a)4., or opium or any synthetic or natural salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of opium by a person 18 years of age or older, when such drug is proven to be the proximate cause of the death of the user,

(m) Carjacking,

(n) Home-invasion robbery,

(o) Aggravated stalking,

(p) Murder of another human being,

(q) Resisting an officer with violence to his or her person, or

(r) Felony that is an act of terrorism or is in furtherance of an act of terrorism,

is murder in the third degree and constitutes a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
 
armagod;6031641 said:
major pain;6031609 said:
pralims;6031575 said:
fukk that hard black woman shit....what if she has kids or her nephew visit her....shes ok with the same shit happening to them?

You should probably realize that as an attorney that works at a law firm, she probably doesnt get the choice of who the firm defends etc.

I recently had to go through arbitration with a law firm and during the arbitration the lawyer was pulling all kinds of snake tactics and nonsense to try and win the case. Soon as we stepped out, he was like 'yea you guys are going to win this one and its retarded we're even trying to defend ourselves'.

As an attorney, they have to relinquish their own emotional ties to and about their clients. Its that simple. She might actually think the motherfucker deserves the chair, but she can't say that in court.

she is on the "Defense" team fool, they were HIRED by GZ, this nigga aint got no public defender for no M2 charge

So you thinking he picked them out one by one? It's strategy by that firm to help get their client off. White man charged for killing a young black man why not have a young black woman on his defense team to make him appear not racist or prejudice.
 
Gold_Certificate;6031923 said:
Pico Roscoe;6031888 said:
someone explain the murder 3 charge on child abuse?
I think this is what they're going under:
The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated without any design to effect death, by a person engaged in the perpetration of, or in the attempt to perpetrate, any felony other than any:

(a) Trafficking offense prohibited by s. 893.135(1),

(b) Arson,

(c) Sexual battery,

(d) Robbery,

(e) Burglary,

(f) Kidnapping,

(g) Escape,

(h) Aggravated child abuse,

(i) Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult,

(j) Aircraft piracy,

(k) Unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb,

(l) Unlawful distribution of any substance controlled under s. 893.03(1), cocaine as described in s. 893.03(2)(a)4., or opium or any synthetic or natural salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of opium by a person 18 years of age or older, when such drug is proven to be the proximate cause of the death of the user,

(m) Carjacking,

(n) Home-invasion robbery,

(o) Aggravated stalking,

(p) Murder of another human being,

(q) Resisting an officer with violence to his or her person, or

(r) Felony that is an act of terrorism or is in furtherance of an act of terrorism,

is murder in the third degree and constitutes a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
This excludes "aggravated child abuse", but "child abuse" is still a felony; so that would be their justification for third degree.
 
Du_Du;6031975 said:
if zimmerman is a real nigga he'd throw a chair at the judge after the verdict

Dead Presidents don't represent him and he doesn't have the physical capabilities to lift up a chair

 
Last edited:
i2.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
7,819
Views
244
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…