George Zimmerman Trial Thread (Found Not Guilty Jesus help us...)

[Dupac]

"When I attained the gun, the license, and the training; I decided I was 'prepared to use it' at any time, wherever I went while legally carrying it."

Not a particularly damning or significant statement.

.

either "i'm always prepared to defend myslelf withing the boundaries of the law"

or he never even takes the stand

lol

if that question comes up... i guarantee his answer won't be that polished....

not only that, i'd repeat the question...it's a yes or no answer...

did you get out the car with the intent of using the weapon??

I'd assume you'd hear, "Objection! Leading the witness." or some shit before getting that far.

lol, we'll see....i hope it happens

 

[DOC H0LL!DAY]

Why did I get flagged for?

for being a lowlife herb sandwich that only fags eat.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

 

[Trollio]

 

[Dupac]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

 

[Ajackson17]

Why did I get flagged for?

for being a lowlife herb sandwich that only fags eat.

Sounds like racism, bruh.

 

[SOWETO]

this mofo dont know wtf he doin'. OMG, "physical capabilities" (big, strong, nigger.)

is it reasonable to believe that the possibility exists where Martin could beat the shit out of zimmerman?

what do you want?

@Matt- : sure, the possibility exists. but george zimmerman was instructed by a police dispatcher not to engage. and he didn't tell the dispatcher he was armed.

"Actually could you have them, could you have them call me and I'll tell them where I'm at?"

and the above sentence does not mean "i'm gonna follow your instructions, and wait near where i saw him when i called you." it means, "imma follow this motherfucker, 'cause i'm the first line of defense against 'these guys'."

 

[Gold_Certificate]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

 

[Max.]

AND I die for my hood

TRAYVON

 

[Gold_Certificate]

"George Zimmerman is soft."

 

[Dupac]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

i'm just trying to prove that he wasn't defending himself...he provoked a confrontation he knew would end with him shooting trayvon

"these assholes they always get away"

that's what he wanted to do....he wanted to shoot him from the jump....he was just looking for the first opportunity where he thought he can get away with it

 

[Gold_Certificate]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

i'm just trying to prove that he wasn't defending himself...he provoked a confrontation he knew would end with him shooting trayvon

"these assholes they always get away"

that's what he wanted to do....

The bolded is still conjecture.

 

[Dupac]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

i'm just trying to prove that he wasn't defending himself...he provoked a confrontation he knew would end with him shooting trayvon

"these assholes they always get away"

that's what he wanted to do....

The bolded is still conjecture.

but it's validated by that being exactly what happened

 

[Purr]

AND I die for my hood

TRAYVON

shut the fuck up. they are doing the exact same racial profiling in arizona and pushing for it to be done in California. your ass don't live in san Francisco which is a sanctuary city.

so keep the stupid ass black racial jokes at a minimum.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

i'm just trying to prove that he wasn't defending himself...he provoked a confrontation he knew would end with him shooting trayvon

"these assholes they always get away"

that's what he wanted to do....

The bolded is still conjecture.

but it's validated by that being exactly what happened

It isn't, you're applying hindsight bias.

 

[Max.]

AND I die for my hood

TRAYVON

shut the fuck up. they are doing the exact same racial profiling in arizona and pushing for it to be done in California. your ass don't live in san Francisco which is a sanctuary city.

so keep the stupid ass black racial jokes at a minimum.

Im good..i was born here not every mexican is from mexico,,.

No worries..they can send these mfs back to mexico dont effect me

 

[Dupac]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

i'm just trying to prove that he wasn't defending himself...he provoked a confrontation he knew would end with him shooting trayvon

"these assholes they always get away"

that's what he wanted to do....

The bolded is still conjecture.

but it's validated by that being exactly what happened

It isn't, you're applying hindsight bias.

all the prosecution has to do is lead the jury to believe that was the case.....

it's a fairly simple concept to grasp, and given the way things went down, it's very plausible that they might feel this way once prosecution really gets going

 

[Max.]

I like how no one answered my question about if hes not found guilty? What yall gona do riot?

Look at what happen with oscar grant

 

[Gold_Certificate]

fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....

as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....

and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...

dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the shit was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....

so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to kill this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them

You're over-thinking it bruh.

You don't wait for the nigga to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.

That's the concept this law is based on.

there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble

The bolded is subjective, and the underlined is conjecture.

If Zimmerman reasonably felt that things could go that far, that would justify the use of force under the law.

For him, the indication could be as simple as, "If I'm getting my ass beat, with no end in sight.".

but the shooting of trayvon and the absence of any life threatening injuries add validity to both statements..... zimmer knew the police were on the way.. he coulda reasonably held trayvon off until the police arrived.....

where is his attempt to preserve life here?

there is no attempt to preserve, because by carrying the gun to the altercation it's clear that he'd rather take life

Nah. Life threatening injuries aren't required here, nor is any "attempt to preserve life".

Such requirements would fuck up self-defense laws in general.

well that's what we're trying to argue against....

murder vs self defense

Then your problem lies more with the law itself rather than these specific circumstances.

i'm just trying to prove that he wasn't defending himself...he provoked a confrontation he knew would end with him shooting trayvon

"these assholes they always get away"

that's what he wanted to do....

The bolded is still conjecture.

but it's validated by that being exactly what happened

It isn't, you're applying hindsight bias.

all the prosecution has to do is lead the jury to believe that was the case.....

it's a fairly simple concept to grasp, and given the way things went down, it's very plausible that they might feel this way once prosecution really gets going

Word. The prosecution can try to lead them to think/feel whatever they want.

 

[Purr]

AND I die for my hood

TRAYVON

shut the fuck up. they are doing the exact same racial profiling in arizona and pushing for it to be done in California. your ass don't live in san Francisco which is a sanctuary city.

so keep the stupid ass black racial jokes at a minimum.

Im good..i was born here not every mexican is from mexico,,.

No worries..they can send these mfs back to mexico dont effect me

did I state you werent born here? no.

I'm speaking about how real racial profiling will really get when its voted and mandates in California like Arizona.

you will be affected too.