Already Home_17
New member
vageneral08;6045739 said:Angry grandpa went ham on the house after hearing the verdict
=c4-overview&list=UUPFVhmjjSkFhfstm2LghZIg
"dad these are your teeth on the floor
your teeth!!!!"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
vageneral08;6045739 said:Angry grandpa went ham on the house after hearing the verdict
=c4-overview&list=UUPFVhmjjSkFhfstm2LghZIg
FuriousOne;6045836 said:G.Avant;6045770 said:My nigga saying that black people shouldn't arm themselves legally as a form of self defense because it would reinforce stereotypes is some coon shit, PERIOD. Who said anything about just going around killing white people. Da fuck you talking bout? I obviously agree that all the black on black crime needs to stop, but using that shit to neutralize when we take issue with anything else is some weak shit. You see how bold crackers are getting and understand that crackers will be crackers, but you want black people to be sitting ducks in the community because you don't want to offend or rile up the same people who you apparently understand are racist as hell? Yep that makes a lot of sense. You want to strip our people of a legal right to protect themselves because you don't want to make the white man uncomfortable. YES YOU'RE SACRIFICING YOUR OWN PEOPLE CLOWN!!! If some of these aggressive mufuckas decided to run up in one of our hoods where we we're able to actual exist in peace whats the plan then? It'll be duck hunt because they didn't even exercise their right to bear arms. SMH
Here we go wit the coon talk. It's duck hunt no matter how you see it and my point was that many of us can't have guns legally because of our unfair criminal status. You think you gonna fend off crackers with your pea shooters? You gonna manufacture your own guns? What would keep Treyvon from getting shot by somebody legally owning a gun? Should 17 year olds have guns too or 16 year olds or younger? Would he have pulled quicker? What if it was fair and fools like Zimmerman didn't have a gun in the first place? Who makes the laws on who should legally own a gun anyway? How deep are you thinking about this? So a black man with a gun is going to hold off a swat with more guns right? No dummy, we need to do better and if it is that much of a threat regardless, then maybe we should consider going back to the motherland because you not doing a damn thing with a strap. My point was that many of our black kids have guns already and they are using it on each other clown..
Doubletee;6045910 said:BIGGin..tryna get banned quick
George Zimmerman has sued NBC Universal for defamation. The company strongly denies the allegation.
BIRGGin;6045864 said:zombie;6045860 said:what the fuck do you think would help
Using simple logic I'd say, not attacking the man in the first place.
cobbland;6045857 said:Gold_Certificate;6045828 said:This won't really help. Zimmerman claimed defense under the regular self-defense law.cobbland;6045790 said:Elzo69Revolutions;6045748 said:So where do we go from here?
Stop financially supporting the states that have "Stand Your Ground Laws."
From their "major colleges" to their businesses.
*Yes I know many HBCU's are located in the south, I attended one*
Many states have enacted “stand your ground” laws that remove the duty to retreat before using force in self-defense. The following is a list of states with stand your ground laws on the books. This list is limited to those states whose legislatures have gone through the process of enacting laws that specifically affirm an individual’s right to stand their ground when defending themselves against a threat. Other states may have adopted a stand your ground doctrine through judicial interpretation of their self-defense laws, but those states are not included in this list.
Alabama
Arizona
Florida
Georgia
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
For example: Maryland doesn't have "stand your ground", but the same law would still apply to Zimmerman's claim:Self-defense is a defense, and the defendant must be found not guilty if all of the following three factors are present:
1) The defendant actually believed that was in immediate and imminent danger of bodily harm.
2) The defendant's belief was reasonable.
3) The defendant used no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend in light of the threatened or actual harm.
Doubletee;6045918 said:How bout if zimmerman never approached martin in the first place..or better yet call the cops for no reason.He called the cops because he racially profiled trayvon martin..which led him to beileve the break in's in the area was caused by black boys so if he see any black male he will assume that he's "up to no good"
zombie;6045860 said:Gold_Certificate;6045828 said:This won't really help. Zimmerman claimed defense under the regular self-defense law.cobbland;6045790 said:Elzo69Revolutions;6045748 said:So where do we go from here?
Stop financially supporting the states that have "Stand Your Ground Laws."
From their "major colleges" to their businesses.
*Yes I know many HBCU's are located in the south, I attended one*
Many states have enacted “stand your ground” laws that remove the duty to retreat before using force in self-defense. The following is a list of states with stand your ground laws on the books. This list is limited to those states whose legislatures have gone through the process of enacting laws that specifically affirm an individual’s right to stand their ground when defending themselves against a threat. Other states may have adopted a stand your ground doctrine through judicial interpretation of their self-defense laws, but those states are not included in this list.
Alabama
Arizona
Florida
Georgia
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
For example: Maryland doesn't have "stand your ground", but the same law would still apply to Zimmerman's claim:Self-defense is a defense, and the defendant must be found not guilty if all of the following three factors are present:
1) The defendant actually believed that was in immediate and imminent danger of bodily harm.
2) The defendant's belief was reasonable.
3) The defendant used no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend in light of the threatened or actual harm.
Elzo69Revolutions;6045748 said:So where do we go from here?
7figz;6045929 said:Gotta give these motherfuckas some type of recognition.
I don't think I'd expend the effort to create an account on a site full of people I have such disdain for.
FuriousOne;6045862 said:7figz;6045848 said:FuriousOne;6045836 said:G.Avant;6045770 said:My nigga saying that black people shouldn't arm themselves legally as a form of self defense because it would reinforce stereotypes is some coon shit, PERIOD. Who said anything about just going around killing white people. Da fuck you talking bout? I obviously agree that all the black on black crime needs to stop, but using that shit to neutralize when we take issue with anything else is some weak shit. You see how bold crackers are getting and understand that crackers will be crackers, but you want black people to be sitting ducks in the community because you don't want to offend or rile up the same people who you apparently understand are racist as hell? Yep that makes a lot of sense. You want to strip our people of a legal right to protect themselves because you don't want to make the white man uncomfortable. YES YOU'RE SACRIFICING YOUR OWN PEOPLE CLOWN!!! If some of these aggressive mufuckas decided to run up in one of our hoods where we we're able to actual exist in peace whats the plan then? It'll be duck hunt because they didn't even exercise their right to bear arms. SMH
Here we go wit the coon talk. It's duck hunt no matter how you see it and my point was that many of us can't have guns legally because of our unfair criminal status. You think you gonna fend off crackers with your pea shooters? You gonna manufacture your own guns? What would keep Treyvon from getting shot by somebody legally owning a gun? Should 17 year olds have guns too or 16 year olds or younger? Would he have pulled quicker? What if it was fair and fools like Zimmerman didn't have a gun in the first place? Who makes the laws on who should legally own a gun anyway? How deep are you thinking about this? So a black man with a gun is going to hold off a swat with more guns right? No dummy, we need to do better and if it is that much of a threat regardless, then maybe we should consider going back to the motherland because you not doing a damn thing with a strap. My point was that many of our black kids have guns already and they are using it on each other clown..
Can't figure out if you're trying to say that Black people shouldn't own guns.
Nope, I'm not saying we shouldn't. I'm saying that should be our rallying cry and our way to solve the issue because it's an asinine strategy if that's all you plan on relying on which seems to be the main thing people are screaming in this thread. I'm also saying guns aren't going to do shit vs people who obviously don't care about us and happen to be the ones manufacturing and creating laws for these guns. If we do such a thing, we damn sure shouldn't be so overt and brazing about it because you are showing your hand and it should be our final defense and effort. I'm also saying we have plenty of guns but are using them on ourselves as a people and we should make that a loud issue as loud if not more loud then this because we are committing self genocide. What stops them from doing us like they did us before? Time for a new strategy because being armed didn't work for the Panthers or Malcolm X. But they did have great success in other areas not involving guns.
Gold_Certificate;6045933 said:zombie;6045860 said:Gold_Certificate;6045828 said:This won't really help. Zimmerman claimed defense under the regular self-defense law.cobbland;6045790 said:Elzo69Revolutions;6045748 said:So where do we go from here?
Stop financially supporting the states that have "Stand Your Ground Laws."
From their "major colleges" to their businesses.
*Yes I know many HBCU's are located in the south, I attended one*
Many states have enacted “stand your ground” laws that remove the duty to retreat before using force in self-defense. The following is a list of states with stand your ground laws on the books. This list is limited to those states whose legislatures have gone through the process of enacting laws that specifically affirm an individual’s right to stand their ground when defending themselves against a threat. Other states may have adopted a stand your ground doctrine through judicial interpretation of their self-defense laws, but those states are not included in this list.
Alabama
Arizona
Florida
Georgia
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
For example: Maryland doesn't have "stand your ground", but the same law would still apply to Zimmerman's claim:Self-defense is a defense, and the defendant must be found not guilty if all of the following three factors are present:
1) The defendant actually believed that was in immediate and imminent danger of bodily harm.
2) The defendant's belief was reasonable.
3) The defendant used no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend in light of the threatened or actual harm.
FuriousOne;6045836 said:G.Avant;6045770 said:My nigga saying that black people shouldn't arm themselves legally as a form of self defense because it would reinforce stereotypes is some coon shit, PERIOD. Who said anything about just going around killing white people. Da fuck you talking bout? I obviously agree that all the black on black crime needs to stop, but using that shit to neutralize when we take issue with anything else is some weak shit. You see how bold crackers are getting and understand that crackers will be crackers, but you want black people to be sitting ducks in the community because you don't want to offend or rile up the same people who you apparently understand are racist as hell? Yep that makes a lot of sense. You want to strip our people of a legal right to protect themselves because you don't want to make the white man uncomfortable. YES YOU'RE SACRIFICING YOUR OWN PEOPLE CLOWN!!! If some of these aggressive mufuckas decided to run up in one of our hoods where we we're able to actual exist in peace whats the plan then? It'll be duck hunt because they didn't even exercise their right to bear arms. SMH
Here we go wit the coon talk. It's duck hunt no matter how you see it and my point was that many of us can't have guns legally because of our unfair criminal status. You think you gonna fend off crackers with your pea shooters? You gonna manufacture your own guns? What would keep Treyvon from getting shot by somebody legally owning a gun? Should 17 year olds have guns too or 16 year olds or younger? Would he have pulled quicker? What if it was fair and fools like Zimmerman didn't have a gun in the first place? Who makes the laws on who should legally own a gun anyway? How deep are you thinking about this? So a black man with a gun is going to hold off a swat with more guns right? No dummy, we need to do better and if it is that much of a threat regardless, then maybe we should consider going back to the motherland because you not doing a damn thing with a strap. My point was that many of our black kids have guns already and they are using it on each other clown..
damobb2deep;6045951 said:FuriousOne;6045836 said:G.Avant;6045770 said:My nigga saying that black people shouldn't arm themselves legally as a form of self defense because it would reinforce stereotypes is some coon shit, PERIOD. Who said anything about just going around killing white people. Da fuck you talking bout? I obviously agree that all the black on black crime needs to stop, but using that shit to neutralize when we take issue with anything else is some weak shit. You see how bold crackers are getting and understand that crackers will be crackers, but you want black people to be sitting ducks in the community because you don't want to offend or rile up the same people who you apparently understand are racist as hell? Yep that makes a lot of sense. You want to strip our people of a legal right to protect themselves because you don't want to make the white man uncomfortable. YES YOU'RE SACRIFICING YOUR OWN PEOPLE CLOWN!!! If some of these aggressive mufuckas decided to run up in one of our hoods where we we're able to actual exist in peace whats the plan then? It'll be duck hunt because they didn't even exercise their right to bear arms. SMH
Here we go wit the coon talk. It's duck hunt no matter how you see it and my point was that many of us can't have guns legally because of our unfair criminal status. You think you gonna fend off crackers with your pea shooters? You gonna manufacture your own guns? What would keep Treyvon from getting shot by somebody legally owning a gun? Should 17 year olds have guns too or 16 year olds or younger? Would he have pulled quicker? What if it was fair and fools like Zimmerman didn't have a gun in the first place? Who makes the laws on who should legally own a gun anyway? How deep are you thinking about this? So a black man with a gun is going to hold off a swat with more guns right? No dummy, we need to do better and if it is that much of a threat regardless, then maybe we should consider going back to the motherland because you not doing a damn thing with a strap. My point was that many of our black kids have guns already and they are using it on each other clown..
I have a question... say trayvon had a gun and got in a shoot out wit Zimmerman.. killed Zimmerman do u think trayvon could yell self defense?
we all kno how it is when he didn't have a gun...
lets say Zimmerman didn't have a gun and trayvon got his head SCRATCHED on the concrete could trayvon say he was fearing 4 his life?
these are unbiased facts that the answer is no... that shows u how the system is set up..
Doubletee;6045948 said:You dont get what im saying. NONE OF THIS WOULD OF NEVER HAPPENED AND TRAYVON MARTIN WOULD STILL BE ALIVE TODAY IF GEORGE ZIMMERMAN DIDNT APPROACH HIM.
cobbland;6045942 said:Gold_Certificate;6045933 said:zombie;6045860 said:Gold_Certificate;6045828 said:This won't really help. Zimmerman claimed defense under the regular self-defense law.cobbland;6045790 said:Elzo69Revolutions;6045748 said:So where do we go from here?
Stop financially supporting the states that have "Stand Your Ground Laws."
From their "major colleges" to their businesses.
*Yes I know many HBCU's are located in the south, I attended one*
Many states have enacted “stand your ground” laws that remove the duty to retreat before using force in self-defense. The following is a list of states with stand your ground laws on the books. This list is limited to those states whose legislatures have gone through the process of enacting laws that specifically affirm an individual’s right to stand their ground when defending themselves against a threat. Other states may have adopted a stand your ground doctrine through judicial interpretation of their self-defense laws, but those states are not included in this list.
Alabama
Arizona
Florida
Georgia
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
For example: Maryland doesn't have "stand your ground", but the same law would still apply to Zimmerman's claim:Self-defense is a defense, and the defendant must be found not guilty if all of the following three factors are present:
1) The defendant actually believed that was in immediate and imminent danger of bodily harm.
2) The defendant's belief was reasonable.
3) The defendant used no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend in light of the threatened or actual harm.