FuriousOne;5276069 said:Btw, the typo is Leviticus 22:11 which i indeed copy and pasted,
Oh ok, thanks for the clarification.
FuriousOne;5276069 said:But, I'm sure you knew that since you are versed in the bible.
Hehe, thanks for the backhanded compliment.
FuriousOne;5276069 said:I don't give a damn how you should treat your slaves.
??? I don’t know where this is coming from or have any idea what specific response, if any, this is for any of what I said, so not much I can do here. But I will say that specific parts of your responses, and hell part of this whole debate, is about the treatment of slaves, so…
FuriousOne;5276069 said:You shouldn't have slaves in the first place.
Agreed, but then again, we don’t live in a perfect world. We live in a harsh world, and so harsh realities WILL exist.
FuriousOne;5276069 said:Also, the new testament is a continuation of the old testament, not a fix.
Who said it was fix? Did I? I’ll have to go check.
FuriousOne;5276069 said:Jesus came to fulfill the law of Moses
Yes, Moses was ONE of the prophets Jesus came to “fulfill.” But I hope that by saying that “Jesus came to fulfill the law of Moses,” you’re not somehow implying that Jesus came to uphold the evils of slavery. If so, that’s a bit of stretch imo. If not, then I’m not understanding the point of your bringing up Jesus and Moses, sorry.
Mathew 5:17: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
Yes…
FuriousOne;5276069 said:If anything, this illuminates that using a book that intended to justify events that were normal back then doesn't apply now just like the book itself.
Ok, here is what I think that you are saying (I just want to be sure I’m not misunderstanding you): The Bible justifies slavery in the old times, and we have moved far away from the old times, so the Bible is outdated and irrelevant.
1. The Bible does not justify slavery. I think that I have already responded to all claims that suggest this. I also want to reemphasize that there is a difference between acknowledging/realizing slavery and justifying/supporting slavery. The Bible does the former, but does not do the latter. I hope that I have given sufficient explanation and evidence to prove this.
2. Does the Bible refer to specific things (like certain ancient cultures) that are not with us today? Of course, the Bible wasn’t written in 2012. Does the Bible refer to nonspecific things that ARE with us today? Of course, the Bible isn’t all about the Israelites and their culture. There are thousands of timeless passages throughout the Bible that are very relevant today. So no, I would say that the Bible (and many other ancient and religious scripture) very much applies to “modern times.”
Last edited: