DNB1;8055810 said:Rasta.;8055783 said:DNB1;8055764 said:lmao @ all the rapists in this thread.
You all my niggas, so I'ma help you out. If you fucking a girl and she crying in pain, if her body language says no, but she doesn't actually say no, if you have to rip her clothes off her back and go in dry, if you have to use the threat of physical harm to fuck the chick, and if you choose to deflower her in front of a dude that murked her brothers...
...please leave and hope she doesn't call the police.
My previous post was sarcasm, of course that was rape.
Of course it's rape, but you niggas need to either read or put your thinking caps on. The prerogative is on the reader to ascertain where and when an author depicts his or her piece. we're not talking present day Scotland Yard or Yankee laws.
Fam, just because it wasn't recognised as rape in the time setting doesn't mean it wasn't rape. That's like saying Jamie fucking Cersei is not incest because it wasn't outlawed in the time setting.
Who or what set the laws that equal rape? When were those laws set? I'm not sure you niggas are able to discern a fictional tale to non fictional tale. The laws that apply to the realm of men may not apply there. Even within the books, we see this as Westeroos laws aren't applicable to Mereen laws