Feminist Now Trying to Come After King Kendrick!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
atribecalledgabi;c-9710167 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-9710045 said:
so he says fame is wack an embrace your black natural self....but that's wrong?

do white feminist come this hard at white men?

No. They voted for trump.

You may just be joking, but white feminists didn't really vote for Trump. White women overall did (at least those who voted) but not white feminists. Far from it.
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9710735 said:
this shit is being way overblown

and i find the things he's said in the past about mike brown to be more disturbing

just think the push back comes from this recent idea that he and other men giving women the okay to be “natural” or to have stretch marks is liberating for women ....

nice, requesting an afro or some stretch marks, but he is still asking women to please his gaze

the goal of feminism is to free women from the male gaze and be able to make their own decisions about their own lives...so a man telling women how to present themselves (even if naturally) is a step backwards

not to mention.... to uplift women, it does not require you to tell women how sexy or attractive they are... it's shallow...

and while i love how there are ppl who are trying to broaden our perception of beauty to include cellulite it is becoming a just another way to shame women and pit women against each other

also i believe the ire comes from the irony. the media and artist who are the ones who created/pushed this new big booty plastic surgery craze, now want to critique it....shit just a year or two ago kendrick was surrounded by the likes of lira galore and other knifed up video vixens in "king kuta"

maybe I was spoiled by songs like keep your head up, dear mama, U.N.I.T.Y, none of your business, hey mama, ladies first...

he said in an interview his next album is supposed to be for women so hopefully this is a learning experience

That is essentially the argument I've seen from people complaining. I haven't heard the song myself so I don't know.

That said, if he's not being disrespectful then drop it. I saw one broad say some shit like "Black women ain't here for your sexual entertainment..." and I scoffed at that shit. They reading into it too much. Especially when other niggas flat out making songs calling women bitches and hoes, talking about they can't be trusted, and all that.

If they gotta make up shit or blow shit out of proportion then they just sensitive and insecure. Ain't no cure for that.
 
konceptjones;c-9710157 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9710050 said:
So now these chicks are mad at niggas for saying they prefer them without a bunch of extra shit? Now dudes can't even express their preferences without being attacked? Geez, these feminists need to disappear. Can't we just get them their own island and send them over there. There'd be no men, so they'd have nothing left to complain about.

They would be dead within a couple of weeks.
http://www.returnofkings.com/32053/this-accidental-experiment-shows-the-superiority-of-patriarchy

Quite a few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women – free from the evils of patriarchy – would be like.

And it did. Oh it did.

Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary – there was no leader giving orders. Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.

The women settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.

Now this might all be a fluke, a white raven, an exceptional case not representative of society as whole. But that particular season of Dutch Survivor is not unique. CBS broadcast several Survivor seasons in the US, where men and women started off in separate groups. In most cases (the Amazon and One World), the result was the same. The men quickly got their act together, getting access to food, fire and shelter while the women spent a lot of time and energy on petty little squabbles, eating their meager supplies, getting drenched in storms and generally being pathetic. The opposite situation, where men didn’t get their act together while women quickly built a functional micro society, has not yet been observed outside of feminist fiction, and it probably never will.

and...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...ny-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

Over in one corner sat Alice, a strong-minded 27-year-old who always said what she thought, regardless of how much it might hurt someone else. In the other corner was Sarah, a thirtysomething high-flier who would stand up for herself momentarily - then burst into tears and run for the ladies.

Their simmering fight lasted hours, egged on by spectators taking sides and fuelling the anger. Sometimes other girls would join in, either heckling aggressively or huddling defensively in the toilets. It might sound like a scene from a tawdry reality show such as Big Brother, but the truth is a little more prosaic: it was just a normal morning in my office.

The venomous women were supposedly the talented employees I had headhunted to achieve my utopian dream - a female- only company with happy, harmonious workers benefiting from an absence of men.

Samantha Brick

Samantha Brick: Her business was ruined by the destructive jealousy and in-fighting of an all-female staff

It was an idealistic vision swiftly shattered by the nightmare reality: constant bitchiness, surging hormones, unchecked emotion, attention-seeking and fashion rivalry so fierce it tore my staff apart.

When I read the other day that Sienna Miller had said there was no such thing as 'the Sisterhood', I knew what she meant.

I can understand why people want to believe that women look out for each other - because with men in power at work and in politics, it makes sense for us to stick together.

In fact, there was a time when I believed in the Sisterhood - but that was before women at war led to my emotional and financial ruin.

@Madame_CJSkywalker

yg2xffcu8qkm.gif


ffe77te3r2wi.gif
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9710608 said:
huey;c-9710403 said:
the fuck do these bitches want from a nigga?!

Destruction. At the end of the day, I think these chicks want the "traditional man" to disappear.

Most of this is the result of man-hating butch lesbians infiltrating the feminist movement.

On the low, these chicks try to turn out other women in the movement..........and not just sexually, but mentally as well.

Judging by the kind of rhetoric that's come out of the feminist movement in recent years, I'd have to say that they've been quite successful.
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9710735 said:
nice, requesting an afro or some stretch marks, but he is still asking women to please his gaze

the goal of feminism is to free women from the male gaze and be able to make their own decisions about their own lives...so a man telling women how to present themselves (even if naturally) is a step backwards

not to mention.... to uplift women, it does not require you to tell women how sexy or attractive they are... it's shallow...

and while i love how there are ppl who are trying to broaden our perception of beauty to include cellulite it is becoming a just another way to shame women and pit women against each other

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Part of the problem^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

To.............."free women from the male gaze?"

Really???

I thought conventional feminism was supposed to be all about equality.......equal pay, equal opportunity, etc.

When did that change?

And he wasn't............"telling women how to present themselves."

He was just encouraging women not to fall into the trap of constantly trying to unnaturally enhance their features and to accept themselves as they really are.

You, like many other feminists, took his comments in the worst possible context.

And you wonder why so many people don't take that bullshit seriously.
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9710735 said:
this shit is being way overblown

and i find the things he's said in the past about mike brown to be more disturbing

just think the push back comes from this recent idea that he and other men giving women the okay to be “natural” or to have stretch marks is liberating for women ....

nice, requesting an afro or some stretch marks, but he is still asking women to please his gaze

the goal of feminism is to free women from the male gaze and be able to make their own decisions about their own lives...so a man telling women how to present themselves (even if naturally) is a step backwards

not to mention.... to uplift women, it does not require you to tell women how sexy or attractive they are... it's shallow...

and while i love how there are ppl who are trying to broaden our perception of beauty to include cellulite it is becoming a just another way to shame women and pit women against each other

also i believe the ire comes from the irony. the media and artist who are the ones who created/pushed this new big booty plastic surgery craze, now want to critique it....shit just a year or two ago kendrick was surrounded by the likes of lira galore and other knifed up video vixens in "king kuta"

maybe I was spoiled by songs like keep your head up, dear mama, U.N.I.T.Y, none of your business, hey mama, ladies first...

he said in an interview his next album is supposed to be for women so hopefully this is a learning experience

No you dumb fuck, the goal of feminism is to put women and men on equal footing. The rest of that bullshit is exactly that; some bullshit.

You already have the freedom to make your own decisions about your lives. Thing is, you women make those decisions and do shit to yourselves then get asshurt when men don't like the bullshit you do and somehow find a way to blame us for not feeling good about yourselves because we reject you coming to us with your makeup looking like Homey The Clown, your natural hair shaved off and Toph Beifong's hair glued to your scalp, and surgery, body shapers, and assorted other trickery to give your body cartoonish proportions.

szx2xz.png
 
Rozetta5tone;c-9710937 said:
The biggest problem with feminists. They are pushing the wrong agenda. They are fighting the natural order of things. Even without law and societal structures men and women are still vastly different and will never be equal. We are not reptile, able to switch genders on a whim. We are visual creatures. We look, judge and act. That will never change.

You want respect. Cool. You want workplace equality. Cool. But no woman alive is going to tell me how I should conduct myself as a man. We are a great and numerous species. We have endless choices. Respect is a universal emotion. Don't jump in an arena with a bear and expect a fair fight. Ya ass better train, study and understand your opponent if you expect to win. Feminism is so devisive and it brings out the worst in women.

The current form of feminism is admission by women that they're weaker than men because they expect us to be the ones to change the world to the way they want it because they're unable to do it themselves.
 
I don't want a bitch that looks like Richard Pryor ewww. Even if fros come back in style it would be a shallow trend and a tool for attention whoring
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9710735 said:
the goal of feminism is to free women from the male gaze and be able to make their own decisions about their own lives...so a man telling women how to present themselves (even if naturally) is a step backwards



not to mention.... to uplift women, it does not require you to tell women how sexy or attractive they are... it's shallow...

Nigga what?!?

SMH. No words to exchange with your dumb ass.

If this is what feminism is all about the y'all lost
 
I've yet to see an attractive woman, with some sense, and in a happy relationship, be a feminist. Do they exist? Probably not. You know why that type of woman isn't a feminist? Because she doesn't need to be. She's already happy and confident and doesn't need arbitrary cosigns from ugly ass, single, fat, bitter bitches.

Fuck a G.damn feminist. They can be purged right along with Trump supporters.

 
"Free women from the male gaze"?????

Nah... I'm not goin yo...

You ever seen a woman who doesn't garner ANY attention??? Be it wanted or UNwanted... I have. And let me tell you... They begin to question themselves like they got a split personality and one side is the host and the other is the contestant on a game show.

Let a woman TRULY get NO looks from NOwhere... Broad'll be ready to jump off somethin in no time.

And just to be fair... We'll go ahead and say this applies to the entire human race.

Even UNwanted attention lets you know... "Ok...IF I gotta settle........at least I have the option to do so..."
 
This is a battle people chose.. word there are like 500 other songsthat chicks are shaking their asses to or co-opting the negative/skewed portrayals of women and mainstreaming those labels....
 
Last edited:
I've been saying for years I don't like all that extra shit females do to try to make themselves look just a tad bit better.

You can't say you have a preference for one thing without alienating someone or something, Kendrick simply said he did not like all that extra ish that's all.

I hear women say all the time they won't fool with this type of guy or that type of guy. They basically doing the same thing by saying that which is alienating a group of men or another.

Everyone has their own set of preferences and the man shouldn't be chastise for that. Just my imo though.
 
twenty2;c-9711471 said:
"Free women from the male gaze"?????

Nah... I'm not goin yo...

You ever seen a woman who doesn't garner ANY attention??? Be it wanted or UNwanted... I have. And let me tell you... They begin to question themselves like they got a split personality and one side is the host and the other is the contestant on a game show.

Let a woman TRULY get NO looks from NOwhere... Broad'll be ready to jump off somethin in no time.

And just to be fair... We'll go ahead and say this applies to the entire human race.

Even UNwanted attention lets you know... "Ok...IF I gotta settle........at least I have the option to do so..."

It's almost like looks have played a role in sexual selection for the last 150k years :scream:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
170
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…