Ex LA Cop wanted: 2 murders, manifesto cop hit list, exposing corrupt cops.

[konceptjones]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

 

[Matt-]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

Who said the drones are armed? Many of them are only for areal surveillance. I really doubt they are going to fire a missile on ol boy if they get a visual

 

[BarryHalls]

this nigga is the like ghost of rodney king coming back to spook the shit out of the lapd. its only febuary and chris dorner already got the trill nigga of the year award locked the fuck down.

Does anybody think Chris Dorner aka "Rambro" aka "The Chocolate Knight" aka "Fudge Dredd" will be considered a historical figure during Black History Month going forward?

 

[2 Drawlz]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

Who said the drones are armed? Many of them are only for areal surveillance. I really doubt they are going to fire a missile on ol boy if they get a visual

Yea they just want to find his location, there weren't multiple instances of , shoot to kill.............

 

[2 Drawlz]

Dorner: Records show why ex-cop was thought to have fled to Mexico
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2013/02/dorner-manhunt-new-clues-federal-records.html

New details in federal court records provide clues as to why authorities developed "probable cause" that a former police officer wanted in a deadly shooting rampage may have fled to Mexico as a massive manhunt was gearing up to catch him.

Christopher Jordan Dorner, 33, a former Los Angeles Police Department officer, has eluded authorities since Wednesday night when he was named as the suspect in the slaying of an Irvine couple, a crime that triggered a wave of violence and a law enforcement dragnet across California and Nevada.

Dorner allegedly attempted to steal a boat in San Diego and, after subduing the captain, said he was taking the vessel to Mexico, according to an affidavit filed with a criminal complaint in federal court in Los Angeles. Dorner is accused of telling the captain that he could recover his boat in Mexico.

DOCUMENT: Feds say Dorner may have fled to Mexico

U.S. Marshal: Dorner may have fled to Mexico

"The attempt failed when the bow line of the boat became caught in the boat's propeller, and the suspect fled," according to the affidavit by inspector U.S. Marshal Craig McClusky.

After authorities interviewed the boat captain early Thursday, they found Dorner's wallet and identification cards "at the San Ysidro Point of Entry" near the U.S.-Mexico border, the court records show. That same day, a guard at the Point Loma Naval Base told authorities he had spotted a man matching Dorner's description trying sneak onto the base, according to the court records.

Federal authorities told The Times on Monday night that the court papers, filed late last week, reflected their thinking at the time, but they stressed that Dorner could be anywhere.

PHOTOS: Manhunt for ex-LAPD officer

On Monday, hundreds of officers across Southern California were searching for the fugitive. Investigators said they were sifting through 800 clues, which began pouring in after authorities announced a $1-million reward for information leading to Dorner's capture.

The possibility of Dorner receiving help by an associate was raised in the court records. In his affidavit, McClusky said investigators with the Marine Corps and San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department were conducting a surveillance operation of an Arrow Bear property owned by a family member of the associate Thursday and discovered a burning vehicle nearby that matched the gray Nissan pickup truck used by Dorner.

TIMELINE: Manhunt for ex-LAPD officer

The burning vehicle led to a large-scale search in the San Bernardino Mountains near Big Bear as law enforcement teams scoured the snow-covered terrain looking for Dorner. The effort, which has used search dogs and helicopters with infrared devices, was scheduled to continue Tuesday, authorities said.

A former reserve Navy lieutenant, Dorner allegedly threatened "unconventional and asymmetrical warfare" against police in a lengthy manifesto that authorities say he posted on Facebook. The posting named dozens of potential targets, including police officers, that Dorner allegedly threatened to attack, according to authorities.

The records state that the manifesto was discovered by authorities Wednesday, three days after the slaying of the two Irvine victims, one of them the daughter of a retired LAPD captain whom Dorner blamed in part for his firing from the force in 2009.

The federal document also provides new details on Dorner's alleged attacks against officers in Riverside County early Thursday.

The first shooting was in Corona after an eyewitness reported a person matching Dorner's description at a gas station to an LAPD officer "who was detailed to the area to protect one of the officials whom Dorner had threatened," according to the court records.

"When the officer drove by the gas station, the suspect exited his vehicle and fired an assault rifle at the officer, hitting the officer's vehicle," according to the court records.

The LAPD later said the officer received a grazing wound.

About 30 minutes later, Dorner opened fire on Riverside police officers "who were in the area searching for Dorner," the document said. The account conflicts with a statement provided to the media by Riverside police officials, who said the officers were simply stopped at a red light and not looking for Dorner.

He's sendin those fools on a blank mission to Mexico

Or an excuse to send Drones to Mexico.

 

[konceptjones]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

Who said the drones are armed? Many of them are only for areal surveillance. I really doubt they are going to fire a missile on ol boy if they get a visual

doesn't matter in the least bit. The purpose is to create a reason to have the citizens accept aerial surveillance via drones over their cities. Manned or unmanned surveillance makes no difference here, it's all about acceptance. This would be the baby step towards greater surveillance of the populace.

It's no difference than gaining widespread acceptance for having a GPS transponder on you at all times (it's in your cellphone). You gain widespread acceptance by showing it to be beneficial, so stories about how a heart transplant patient is located by the GPS in his phone get's published and other wonderful stories on how beneficial it is are release all the time. Then stories that appeal to a more basic part of us are released as well (i.e. cheating s/o caught by GPS app). These things drive acceptance.

So... Here's what's going to happen with this: Whether Dorner is captured or not is moot, the key is watching how this is the catalyst for more drones. The next few cases will be as follows: Abducted child safely returned after drone is deployed, lost elderly person found, hikers lost in the snow found using thermal imaging from a drone, high profile crime thwarted by drone, and so on.

Mark my words here, this shit WILL happen over the course of the next couple of years.

 

[VIBE]

I'm all for drones.

Safety = comfort state of mind.

 

[Matt-]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

Who said the drones are armed? Many of them are only for areal surveillance. I really doubt they are going to fire a missile on ol boy if they get a visual

doesn't matter in the least bit. The purpose is to create a reason to have the citizens accept aerial surveillance via drones over their cities. Manned or unmanned surveillance makes no difference here, it's all about acceptance. This would be the baby step towards greater surveillance of the populace.

It's no difference than gaining widespread acceptance for having a GPS transponder on you at all times (it's in your cellphone). You gain widespread acceptance by showing it to be beneficial, so stories about how a heart transplant patient is located by the GPS in his phone get's published and other wonderful stories on how beneficial it is are release all the time. Then stories that appeal to a more basic part of us are released as well (i.e. cheating s/o caught by GPS app). These things drive acceptance.

So... Here's what's going to happen with this: Whether Dorner is captured or not is moot, the key is watching how this is the catalyst for more drones. The next few cases will be as follows: Abducted child safely returned after drone is deployed, lost elderly person found, hikers lost in the snow found using thermal imaging from a drone, high profile crime thwarted by drone, and so on.

Mark my words here, this shit WILL happen over the course of the next couple of years.

it very well may happen.

but he referenced drones shooting this fella just to prove a point. Not the precedent that is set by using drones to hunt a wanted man. Drones are already in use and have been in use as strictly a surveillance too. There is no reason to think that they are not being used in that way now. What happens several years down the line with drones being used isn't really part of what dude was talking about and its not something i'm trying to argue against.

 

[konceptjones]

I'm all for drones.

Safety = comfort state of mind.

Then you're part of the problem already.

 

[2 Drawlz]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

Who said the drones are armed? Many of them are only for areal surveillance. I really doubt they are going to fire a missile on ol boy if they get a visual

doesn't matter in the least bit. The purpose is to create a reason to have the citizens accept aerial surveillance via drones over their cities. Manned or unmanned surveillance makes no difference here, it's all about acceptance. This would be the baby step towards greater surveillance of the populace.

It's no difference than gaining widespread acceptance for having a GPS transponder on you at all times (it's in your cellphone). You gain widespread acceptance by showing it to be beneficial, so stories about how a heart transplant patient is located by the GPS in his phone get's published and other wonderful stories on how beneficial it is are release all the time. Then stories that appeal to a more basic part of us are released as well (i.e. cheating s/o caught by GPS app). These things drive acceptance.

So... Here's what's going to happen with this: Whether Dorner is captured or not is moot, the key is watching how this is the catalyst for more drones. The next few cases will be as follows: Abducted child safely returned after drone is deployed, lost elderly person found, hikers lost in the snow found using thermal imaging from a drone, high profile crime thwarted by drone, and so on.

Mark my words here, this shit WILL happen over the course of the next couple of years.

it very well may happen.

but he referenced drones shooting this fella just to prove a point. Not the precedent that is set by using drones to hunt a wanted man. Drones are already in use and have been in use as strictly a surveillance too. There is no reason to think that they are not being used in that way now. What happens several years down the line with drones being used isn't really part of what dude was talking about and its not something i'm trying to argue against.

Don't twist up my words white boy,

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

Rationalizing is'nt you're strong point, stick to the dry racial jokes.

 

[VIBE]

I'm all for drones.

Safety = comfort state of mind.

Then you're part of the problem already.

If you're against the system, you're apart of the problem.

I'm for our own safety. There is no problem with that.

 

[konceptjones]

I'm all for drones.

Safety = comfort state of mind.

Then you're part of the problem already.

If you're against the system, you're apart of the problem.

I'm for our own safety. There is no problem with that.

"safety" at the cost of freedom is never wort it.

We were "safe" before drones, we'll still be safe without them.

 

[vitoria]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC4c5VWcjtk

so u would be cool with this un-expectantly happening in your neighborhood

 

[VIBE]

I'm all for drones.

Safety = comfort state of mind.

Then you're part of the problem already.

If you're against the system, you're apart of the problem.

I'm for our own safety. There is no problem with that.

"safety" at the cost of freedom is never wort it.

We were "safe" before drones, we'll still be safe without them.

What's "freedom"?

How do we lose it?

 

[Black Boy King]

I can see it now. A whole hood gets sprayed up because a drone "malfunctioned"

 

[Matt-]

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

are you stupid or just high?

no, he's not stupid. It's called a False Flag op.

Who said the drones are armed? Many of them are only for areal surveillance. I really doubt they are going to fire a missile on ol boy if they get a visual

doesn't matter in the least bit. The purpose is to create a reason to have the citizens accept aerial surveillance via drones over their cities. Manned or unmanned surveillance makes no difference here, it's all about acceptance. This would be the baby step towards greater surveillance of the populace.

It's no difference than gaining widespread acceptance for having a GPS transponder on you at all times (it's in your cellphone). You gain widespread acceptance by showing it to be beneficial, so stories about how a heart transplant patient is located by the GPS in his phone get's published and other wonderful stories on how beneficial it is are release all the time. Then stories that appeal to a more basic part of us are released as well (i.e. cheating s/o caught by GPS app). These things drive acceptance.

So... Here's what's going to happen with this: Whether Dorner is captured or not is moot, the key is watching how this is the catalyst for more drones. The next few cases will be as follows: Abducted child safely returned after drone is deployed, lost elderly person found, hikers lost in the snow found using thermal imaging from a drone, high profile crime thwarted by drone, and so on.

Mark my words here, this shit WILL happen over the course of the next couple of years.

it very well may happen.

but he referenced drones shooting this fella just to prove a point. Not the precedent that is set by using drones to hunt a wanted man. Drones are already in use and have been in use as strictly a surveillance too. There is no reason to think that they are not being used in that way now. What happens several years down the line with drones being used isn't really part of what dude was talking about and its not something i'm trying to argue against.

Don't twist up my words white boy,

Rationalizing is'nt you're strong point, stick to the dry racial jokes.

Idk.. I wouldn't b shocked if this is a ploy , to have drones offically in use on American soil.

Dorner get got by a drone and, people's perceptions on drones change.

my bad man. I messed up by reading this assuming that you meant an Droner would get got by a drone

 

[BarryHalls]

Too bad its snowing in Big Bear. Chris could of been pulling these type of stunts.

 

[Purr]

I got 99 problems but a drone aint one.

 

[konceptjones]

I'm all for drones.

Safety = comfort state of mind.

Then you're part of the problem already.

If you're against the system, you're apart of the problem.

I'm for our own safety. There is no problem with that.

"safety" at the cost of freedom is never wort it.

We were "safe" before drones, we'll still be safe without them.

What's "freedom"?

How do we lose it?

Warrant-less surveillance without probable cause provided by drones in the air at all times (it's currently unconstitutional, even for thermal imaging thanks to SCOTUS Justice Scalia). It's only a matter of time before it happens and made legal by some means.

 

[Matt-]

I got 99 problems but a drone aint one.

you are better than that