Duncan>>>>>Kobe

[Jr523]

Scoring ability? Kobe can take over a game at any point. I think thats why he gets the Jordan comparison so much. When they turn it on, you could have 6 players on defense, aint no stopping them.

Like Timmy doesnt have clutch ability. Come again.

 

[Copper]

Can somebody tell me wat has Kobe done better than Duncan other than having great big men.

won more rings

stayed on top of his game longer

more consistent scorer in recent years

more impact on peers

produce more ratings and viewership

sold more merchandise jerseys

helped spread the game globaly

 

[major pain]

Like Timmy doesnt have clutch ability. Come again.

I said nothing about clutch. I said scoring ability. Try reading that again.

 

[Jr523]

won more rings

stayed on top of his game longer

more consistent scorer in recent years

more impact on peers

produce more ratings and viewership

sold more merchandise jerseys

helped spread the game globaly

None of that shit matters in terms of b-ball. Duncan was the MAN on all of his championship runs. Kobe, not so much. Even though Timmy is playing a career year, this is one of his more efficient seasons. Kobe had more impact on his peers?? Nigga please..

[video=youtube;7adyWRtWoFM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7adyWRtWoFM[/video]

Watch this vid.

Kobe fucks up games and makes his players frustrated and nervous.

 

[Jr523]

I said nothing about clutch. I said scoring ability. Try reading that again.

Yea u said "turn it on" which usually means clutchness.

 

[major pain]

Yea u said "turn it on" which usually means clutchness.

What are context clues?

Context clues are hints that an author gives to help define a difficult or unusual word. The clue may appear within the same sentence as the word to which it refers, or it may follow in a preceding sentence. Because most of one's vocabulary is gained through reading, it is important that you be able to recognize and take advantage of context clues. There are at least four kinds of context clues that are quite common: 1) a synonym (or repeat context clue) which appears in that sentence; 2) an antonym (or contrast context clue) that has the opposite meaning, which can reveal the meaning of an unknown term; 3) an explanation for an unknown word is given (a definition context clue) within the sentence or in the sentence immediately preceding; and 4) specific examples (an example context clue) used to define the term. There may also be word-part context clues in which a common prefix, suffix, or root will suggest at least part of the meaning of a word. A general sense context clue lets the reader puzzle out a word meaning from whatever information is available - and this is the most common kind of context clue. Others describe context clues in three ways: 1) semantic or meaning clues, e.g., When reading a story about cats, good readers develop the expectation that it will contain words associated with cats, such as "tail," "purr," "scratch," and "whiskers"; 2) syntactic or word order clues where the order of the words in a sentence can indicate that a missing word must be (for example, a verb); and 3) picture clues where illustrations help with the identification of a word.

 

[Jr523]

What are context clues?

Context clues are hints that an author gives to help define a difficult or unusual word. The clue may appear within the same sentence as the word to which it refers, or it may follow in a preceding sentence. Because most of one's vocabulary is gained through reading, it is important that you be able to recognize and take advantage of context clues. There are at least four kinds of context clues that are quite common: 1) a synonym (or repeat context clue) which appears in that sentence; 2) an antonym (or contrast context clue) that has the opposite meaning, which can reveal the meaning of an unknown term; 3) an explanation for an unknown word is given (a definition context clue) within the sentence or in the sentence immediately preceding; and 4) specific examples (an example context clue) used to define the term. There may also be word-part context clues in which a common prefix, suffix, or root will suggest at least part of the meaning of a word. A general sense context clue lets the reader puzzle out a word meaning from whatever information is available - and this is the most common kind of context clue. Others describe context clues in three ways: 1) semantic or meaning clues, e.g., When reading a story about cats, good readers develop the expectation that it will contain words associated with cats, such as "tail," "purr," "scratch," and "whiskers"; 2) syntactic or word order clues where the order of the words in a sentence can indicate that a missing word must be (for example, a verb); and 3) picture clues where illustrations help with the identification of a word.

Fuck all that.. When a great scorer turns it on, hes talking about in the clutch. So a nigga "turns it on" in the first quarter.

 

[Copper]

None of that shit matters in terms of b-ball. Duncan was the MAN on all of his championship runs. Kobe, not so much. Even though Timmy is playing a career year, this is one of his more efficient seasons. Kobe had more impact on his peers?? Nigga please..

Watch this vid.

Kobe fucks up games and makes his players frustrated and nervous.

1. u asked what kobe did better. I named it. u didnt say in what context in game or for the game of basketball. u werent specific

2. Ive seen the vid. no one cares about smush parker. hes bitter and was atrash player.

3. if u asked any players whos accomplishments they would want to have more they would name kobe (alot have/has looked ot him as being the best)

4. duncan wasnt "the man" in 99' david was. and kobes been "the man" on the last 2

 

[Copper]

kobe aint clutch no either? damn...

 

[major pain]

Fuck all that.. When a great scorer turns it on, hes talking about in the clutch. So a nigga "turns it on" in the first quarter.

Look lets be clear on something since I think you are arguing with me because you think I believe Bean >> Duncan (I could be wrong but w/e). I dont. I would put Duncan on my list before him.

In regards to this post here... Wilt putting up 100, Jordan putting up 65, Kobe putting up 81 are all indicative of them having a high scoring ability and being able to turn it on at anytime, not just clutch situations. WHAT THE FUCK are you talking about with scoring ability = clutchness?????

 

[Jr523]

1. u asked what kobe did better. I named it. u didnt say in what context in game or for the game of basketball. u werent specific

2. Ive seen the vid. no one cares about smush parker. hes bitter and was atrash player.

3. if u asked any players whos accomplishments they would want to have more they would name kobe (alot have/has looked ot him as being the best)

4. duncan wasnt "the man" in 99' david was. and kobes been "the man" on the last 2

Duncan was the man in ALL of his championships. So ur saying that a player have 1 mvp instead of 2? 2 finals mvps instead of 3 finals mvps? In that vid Smush is saying wat most players have felt.

 

[Jr523]

Look lets be clear on something since I think you are arguing with me because you think I believe Bean >> Duncan (I could be wrong but w/e). I dont. I would put Duncan on my list before him.

In regards to this post here... Wilt putting up 100, Jordan putting up 65, Kobe putting up 81 are all indicative of them having a high scoring ability and being able to turn it on at anytime, not just clutch situations. WHAT THE FUCK are you talking about with scoring ability = clutchness?????

Ok I didnt see that scoring ability line. My bad bruh. Duncan had great scoring ability as well.

 

[major pain]

Ok I didnt see that scoring ability line. My bad bruh. Duncan had great scoring ability as well.

I said nothing about clutch. I said scoring ability. Try reading that again.

Nigga you drunk?!?!? LOL...

What are context clues?

Context clues are hints that an author gives to help define a difficult or unusual word. The clue may appear within the same sentence as the word to which it refers, or it may follow in a preceding sentence. Because most of one's vocabulary is gained through reading, it is important that you be able to recognize and take advantage of context clues. There are at least four kinds of context clues that are quite common: 1) a synonym (or repeat context clue) which appears in that sentence; 2) an antonym (or contrast context clue) that has the opposite meaning, which can reveal the meaning of an unknown term; 3) an explanation for an unknown word is given (a definition context clue) within the sentence or in the sentence immediately preceding; and 4) specific examples (an example context clue) used to define the term. There may also be word-part context clues in which a common prefix, suffix, or root will suggest at least part of the meaning of a word. A general sense context clue lets the reader puzzle out a word meaning from whatever information is available - and this is the most common kind of context clue. Others describe context clues in three ways: 1) semantic or meaning clues, e.g., When reading a story about cats, good readers develop the expectation that it will contain words associated with cats, such as "tail," "purr," "scratch," and "whiskers"; 2) syntactic or word order clues where the order of the words in a sentence can indicate that a missing word must be (for example, a verb); and 3) picture clues where illustrations help with the identification of a word.

 

[Copper]

Duncan was the man in ALL of his championships. So ur saying that a player have 1 mvp instead of 2? 2 finals mvps instead of 3 finals mvps? In that vid Smush is saying wat most players have felt.

You mean when D Rob averaged 15 and 10 in the reg season and 16 and 9 in the playoffs? While duncan put up 23 and 12?

Didnt timmy D drop 33 and 19 in a finals game and like 29 and 20? Thats why Duncan won 99 finals mvp,Cuz david robinson was 'the man' Robinson was a secondary player from 99-03

Lol @ how hard your desperate groupie ass is tryin

duncan was not the man in all of his championship runs d-rob was captain and leader inthe first and t.parker was the mvp in one of those as well

and tommy stop getting butt hurt and emotional b/c niggas have a diff. opinion and can be objective. ur pathetic

 

[Copper]

u posting stats dont mean robinson wasnt the leader of that team like I stated previously.

yall said duncan was the man on all of his championship runs when T.Parker got Mvp once and Robinson was the team leader during the first run.

so that proves that statements to be false.

no one made up anything. u just mad cause ur most hated got 5 rings.

 

[b*braze]

gasol was an all-star in memphis

lmao... nigga jamal magloire was an all star too

 

[MR.CJ]

lmao... nigga jamal magloire was an all star too

and gasol is still an all-star

 

[Copper]

could haves dont count nigga. Parker was MVP and "the man" (since thats yalls judging criteria) therefore yall are wrong.

 

[MR.CJ]

lmao... nigga jamal magloire was an all star too

bruh don't act like gasol was a scrub. the dude avg 20 points per game for 2 years straight

 

[b*braze]

bruh don't act like gasol was a scrub. the dude avg 20 points per game for 2 years straight

im not... just pointed out your terrible argument that allstar=elite.

for the record i do believe gasol is elite