Does anybody REALLY believe in these stories of the Fallen Angels / Nephilim? 'Cause I 'unno

[Arya Tsaddiq]

I'm reading online now that those stories you've referenced were hoaxes.

i saw an article about that when I posted it. But the second link I posted had more than one example of newspaper clips from the past mentioning giant remains being found. Take it for why you will though. Because if there is any truth to the claim that the Smithsonian is suppressing these finding and not displaying the bones, then it wouldn't surprise me that whoever is behind the coverup would try to discredit the sources.

 

[Arya Tsaddiq]

Plus, most of what I've seen is people calling the sources "bad sources" and focusing on the pictures that definitely were fake.

But the I haven't seen anything verifying that the old newspaper articles are fake. And there have been numerous claims of giant remains being found over the last 100 years. So you have people saying "where are the pictures of the remains?" and things like that. But the people in charge of the media control what gets out and what doesn't. And its an art to be able to sway the opinion of the masses even of certain things leak out. So take that into consideration as well....

 

[Bodhi]

I'm sure if there were a bunch of giant skeletons, the Smithsonian institute wouldn't have their hands on every single one of them. I find it interesting how conspiracy theorists usually claim there's a giant cover up by scientists in order to protect an agenda yet science has always been disproving itself and readjusting with the times. Sure, there are a lot of professionals making money off current theories but there's even more to be made off new discoveries.

 

[Bodhi]

Also, if you look at those pictures of the newspaper articles, there are problems with all of them. For instance, neither one of them shows the entire article nor gives credit to the journalist who supposedly authored it. Secondly, a few of them have NY times on them (obviously out of place verifiable by the fact that the heading is not aligned with the body) but in the actual body of the article, a different newspaper is named, e.g. the last article has "Wheeler Times" on it. Are Wheeler and NY Times the same paper???

 

[Bodhi]

Wheeling Times*

 

[Bodhi]

Searching for the full article..

 

[Bodhi]

Lol.. This is also very embarrassing for the conspiracy theorists:

I actually took a look at the National Geographic article in reference to Cyclops skeletons found and the article is in reality talking about the remains of an animal distantly related to modern elephants that could have inspired the Cyclops mythology. The article never said they actually found a real Cyclops. Here's an excerpt:

To paleontologists today, the large hole in the center of the skull suggests a pronounced trunk. To the ancient Greeks, Deinotherium skulls could well be the foundation for their tales of the fearsome one-eyed Cyclops.

btw, I looked at the pdfs for the NY times articles but the aforementioned problems are still there.

 

[Arya Tsaddiq]

The new York times had an online archive of all past publications. I was able to find both articles that were cited. You are right about them not giving credit to the journalist. So I looked for more issues around the same time on different stories. None of them that I saw on 1912 list the journalist however.

 

[Bodhi]

What about any others?

 

[Arya Tsaddiq]

What about any others?

my bad for the late response. But I was able to go one the new York times website and use their archive search engine to find all of the articles posted. Its really interesting that they found these giant skeletons, yet none of the museums are displaying them.

Im sure there has to be more that haven't been unearthed, but no one other than archeologists are really trying to find anything.

@bodhi