Django Unchained 2012

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date


TL;DR: Calvin Candie is such a fucked up villian that DiCaprio thought it may have been too much and Tarantino hated writing an antagonist for the first time ever.

Leonardo DiCaprio says ‘Django Unchained’ made him ask ‘Are we going too far?’

We're used to seeing Leonardo DiCaprio as the hero in his movies. So when he decided to be a villain for director Quentin Tarantino, he wasn't going to go halfway with it. The question was, how bad is too bad?

DiCaprio plays Calvin Candie, a wickedly inhumane plantation owner in "Django Unchained," Tarantino's new film set in the pre-Civil War South. A slave owner with no respect for humanity or decency (or dental hygiene for that matter), Candie is a truly repellant character. So much so, in fact, that DiCaprio admitted to Vibe Magazine that upon reading the script, "[My] immediate question was, 'Are we going too far?'"

"Django Unchained" is the story of a slave (Jamie Foxx) who is recruited by a bounty hunter (Christoph Waltz) to help track down a set of brothers only he can identify. Their search leads them to Candie's plantation, where Django's wife Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) is being held. "Candyland," as the place is called, is home to forced slave fights and other indignities. It's tough stuff, and DiCaprio told Vibe "It was hard for me to wrap my head around it."

"For me," DiCaprio said, "the initial thing obviously was playing someone so disreputable and horrible whose ideas I obviously couldn't connect with on any level." He went on: "I remember our first read through, and some of my questions were about the amount of violence, the amount of racism, the explicit use of certain language... My initial response was, 'Do we need to go this far?'" But, DiCaprio concluded, Tarantino's use of in-your-face imagery was necessary to tell the story, just as it was in his previous film, the bloody WWII tale "Inglourious Basterds."

For his part, Tarantino admits that Calvin Candie goes even farther than the bad guys from his previous films. In an interview with Playboy, Tarantino said, "He's the first villain I've ever written that I didn't like. I hated Candie, and I normally like my villains no matter how bad they are." So if he's even more dislikable than the ear-slicing Mr. Blonde in "Reservoir Dogs" or Elle Driver, the one-eyed assassin in "Kill Bill," you know that Candie is bad news.

Tarantino also said while he and DiCaprio have been friends for 15 years, he didn't originally envision the star in the role. It was written for an older actor, but Tarantino adjusted the script to suit DiCaprio's age. He also disclosed that he had previously considered DiCaprio for the bad guy role in "Inglourious Basterds," which later won an Oscar for his "Django" costar Christoph Waltz.

DiCaprio did admit that when he was able to get past his revulsion, there was something freeing about taking on the role of Candie. He said, "Playing a bad guy opens you up to not having as many rules or restraints... It takes you to the darkest place of where you are as a person and lets you indulge in that." Once he gave himself over to the role, he was surprised at how it transported him: "I think it took me to places I didn't even imagine. It really took on a life of its own."
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie...-django-unchained-made-him-ask-005254937.html
 
Went to a screening for this the other day. Really good movie as usual with any Tarantino movie the dialogue was amazing, Christopher waltz and dicaprio were the real stand outs of the movie. It was a lot funnier than I thought it would be but there were some real key dramatic parts as well
 
eyes low;5229647 said:
Went to a screening for this the other day. Really good movie as usual with any Tarantino movie the dialogue was amazing, Christopher waltz and dicaprio were the real stand outs of the movie. It was a lot funnier than I thought it would be but there were some real key dramatic parts as well

I read the script a few months ago and thought the dialogue was dope...

How evil is DiCaprio?

 
CeLLaR-DooR;5230044 said:
eyes low;5229647 said:
Went to a screening for this the other day. Really good movie as usual with any Tarantino movie the dialogue was amazing, Christopher waltz and dicaprio were the real stand outs of the movie. It was a lot funnier than I thought it would be but there were some real key dramatic parts as well

I read the script a few months ago and thought the dialogue was dope...

How evil is DiCaprio?

It was interesting the way his character was built up. For the most part he was cool and joking around then there was a scene where he just flipped the switch and just the fucked up shit he was talking about mixed with his acting it was pretty intense
 
eyes low;5229647 said:
Went to a screening for this the other day. Really good movie as usual with any Tarantino movie the dialogue was amazing, Christopher waltz and dicaprio were the real stand outs of the movie. It was a lot funnier than I thought it would be but there were some real key dramatic parts as well

how many times was nigger used? this is need to know basis.

i'll make sure to bring a white person with me if it's over 100
 


atribecalledgabi;5230155 said:
eyes low;5229647 said:
Went to a screening for this the other day. Really good movie as usual with any Tarantino movie the dialogue was amazing, Christopher waltz and dicaprio were the real stand outs of the movie. It was a lot funnier than I thought it would be but there were some real key dramatic parts as well

how many times was nigger used? this is need to know basis.

i'll make sure to bring a white person with me if it's over 100

Black_Samson;5230159 said:
if this aint Inglorious Basterds for black folk then fuck this movie

Pretty sure it was over 100. The tone isn't as serious as inglorious bastards but Jamie foxx definitely takes out a good amount of white people

 
Last edited:
is it more than one rape scene?

i can see this as a chance for them to go crazy wit rape scenes and callit justifiable
 
review:
michael-scott.jpg


review:
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117948899/

Filmmakers who choose to portray this shameful chapter of America's past bear a certain responsibility not to sanitize it. But here, even as it lays the groundwork for "Django's" vengeance, dwelling on such brutality can verge on exploitation. To wit, the film problematically features no fewer than 109 instances of the "N word," most of them deployed either for laughs or alliteration.

im gonna have to walk in that theater like

tumblr_m53w0ljlRP1qc9j6ho2_500.gif


but it will probably be more like

2dAWh.gif
 
Black_Samson;5230159 said:
if this aint Inglorious Basterds for black folk then fuck this movie

it apparently treats white slave owners in the same vain that I.G. treated the nazis. so you should enjoy.
 
BLOODY VALENTINE TO SPAGHETTI WESTERNS.

→ DECEMBER 11, 2012 Writer-director Quentin Tarantino has made one of 2012's best movies with Django Unchained, a weird, wild, and violent crowd-pleaser that serves as a raucous salute to the spaghetti western.

Set in the antebellum South, the story follows a slave named Django (Jamie Foxx) who is taken under the wing of Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz), a German bounty hunter out to get the vicious Brittle brothers. Django can identify these outlaws for Schultz, and soon the duo become bounty hunting partners. Django and Schultz then set out to rescue Django's wife Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) from the infamous plantation Candyland, run by the urbane, but malevolent Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio). Bloody mayhem ensues.

The episodic plot directly nods to the Germanic hero Siegfried's epic quest to rescue Brünnhilde, a saga which Schultz relates to Django at one point. And like any good myth, Django

Unchained sees our hero encounter numerous strange and violent beings along the way, characters brought to life by Tarantino's latest eclectic ensemble.

Don Johnson plays Big Daddy, a plantation owner who dresses like Boss Hogg and seems like a sinister Burl Ives. Jonah Hill and the the screen's first Django, Franco Nero, make cameos. The cast also includes Walton Goggins, James Remar, Michael Parks, Amber Tamblyn, Robert Carradine, Zoe Bell, Tom Savini, Bruce Dern, Tom Wopat, Lee Horsely and Dennis Christopher.

The real standouts in the cast are Waltz, DiCaprio, and Samuel L. Jackson, who plays Candie's loyal, old house slave Stephen. This character, as Tarantino has explained, is meant to personify some of the most hated of African-American stereotypes, while also serving as a crafty villain in his own right. Jackson really sinks his teeth into it and has great chemistry with DiCaprio, whose character he essentially raised. DiCaprio also clearly relishes his larger-than-life role, playing Candie as a dandified bastard. Foxx is solid as Django, stripping away his movie star persona as he also did in Ali and Collateral. He's tough, yet vulnerable.

As with any Tarantino production, though, it's his words that are the real stars here. There are many instantly quotable lines and funny bits. Django Unchained is designed as a crowd-pleaser and it most certainly delivers on that promise, offering up plenty moments of over-the-top gunslinger violence and humor. One of the most striking things about the story, though, is how well Tarantino balances the tone, veering between absurd comedy and brutal scenes of life for slaves in the antebellum South. The casual and incessant racism on display is shocking, but sadly accurate for the era depicted.

Tarantino uses cool, but anachronistic songs for the soundtrack of the film, which celebrates the lower tiers of spaghetti westerns rather than the more acclaimed ones. It's more Sergio Corbucci than Sergio Leone. In many ways, Django Unchained feels like a film that was made in 1970, became a cult classic, but can now be found in a $5 DVD bin (that's not a knock).

My only real gripe with the film is its length. It runs 160 minutes, but drags a bit near the end of the second act, especially after a shootout that would have been the climax of any other western. It's also during this minor lull that Tarantino makes a distracting and self-indulgent cameo. These gripes aside, though, Django Unchained is a hell of a lot of fun and definitely a must-see in the theater.

THE VERDICT

Quentin Tarantino doesn't shy away from the horrors of slavery in Django Unchained even as he delivers a weird, wild, and bloody violent crowd-pleaser in this raucous salute to the spaghetti western.

They gave it a 9.4
 
from those who have seen the movie already, do you think the reviews are moreso a showing of white guilt/trying to be PC because they don't wana be "that guy" who spoke badly about a slave movie? or is the movie really inglourious basterds good?
 
i have slowly started to dislike each new Tarantino movies, but i did like Inglorious Bastards somewhat, so i think i'll like this one. but like i said, i'll be watching a bootleg copy
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
677
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…