Cheap Seats Top 10 Players of All Time (The NBA Edition) #7 Player in NBA History

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
JDSTAYWITIT.;7228936 said:
niggas voting for chamberlain aint watched one game he played in ...lmao

It wouldn't be an "All Time" list w/out the greatest players of "All Time". Maybe you should make a list of "Greatest Players That You've Actually Seen Play". Just a thought.
 
Parallel;7229802 said:
blu197;7229026 said:
Also Rick Barry should be on the list instead of Dr.J

What?

Barry = better scorer,better passer, better outside shooter and better overall... He took a top 10 team ever the 1967 Sixers to 6 games by averaging 40.8 ppg in the finals, that included 55 points in game 3.... He also carried GS to their only title in 1975 while Dr.J was getting sonned by Bill Walton and Magic dolo when Kareem was hurt plus he needed Mosses to carry him to a ring...
 
Jonah 2.0;7229842 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;7228936 said:
niggas voting for chamberlain aint watched one game he played in ...lmao

It wouldn't be an "All Time" list w/out the greatest players of "All Time". Maybe you should make a list of "Greatest Players That You've Actually Seen Play". Just a thought.

That's probably what it should be then .....how the fuck you gone have an intelligent conversation about a niggas greatness and you ain't never watched a fucking lick of him playing?

Y'all cats man.....

Lol....FOH niggaroaches
 
JDSTAYWITIT.;7229891 said:
Jonah 2.0;7229842 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;7228936 said:
niggas voting for chamberlain aint watched one game he played in ...lmao

It wouldn't be an "All Time" list w/out the greatest players of "All Time". Maybe you should make a list of "Greatest Players That You've Actually Seen Play". Just a thought.

That's probably what it should be then .....how the fuck you gone have an intelligent conversation about a niggas greatness and you ain't never watched a fucking lick of him playing?

Y'all cats man.....

Lol....FOH niggaroaches

So you've never had an intelligent discussion revolving around russell or wilt or dr j etc... how old are you btw
 
By that logic it would be impossible to have an "intelligent conversation" about any historical events unless we were there to actually witness them happening. That's deep.
 
Jonah 2.0;7230085 said:
By that logic it would be impossible to have an "intelligent conversation" about any historical events unless we were there to actually witness them happening. That's deep.

gtfoh with that logic shit bruh.. this the cheap seats ain't no body got time for that
 
coop9889;7230057 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;7229891 said:
Jonah 2.0;7229842 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;7228936 said:
niggas voting for chamberlain aint watched one game he played in ...lmao

It wouldn't be an "All Time" list w/out the greatest players of "All Time". Maybe you should make a list of "Greatest Players That You've Actually Seen Play". Just a thought.

That's probably what it should be then .....how the fuck you gone have an intelligent conversation about a niggas greatness and you ain't never watched a fucking lick of him playing?

Y'all cats man.....

Lol....FOH niggaroaches

So you've never had an intelligent discussion revolving around russell or wilt or dr j etc... how old are you btw

Let me restate what im trying to say...what im asking is this..

How can you have a comparative conversation about players greatness or how can you articulate how much better a guy is from another if you've NEVER seen a guy play a single game of basketball... I mean at the very least you have to acknowledge that the only thing you can rely on in that scenario would be stats with no context and hearsay from other people
 
Jonah 2.0;7230085 said:
By that logic it would be impossible to have an "intelligent conversation" about any historical events unless we were there to actually witness them happening. That's deep.

Your logic is idiotic ....basketball analysis is not absolute like most historical fact ...there are many things that are subjective and up to personal interpretation

There is no personal interpretation about whether or not the civil war happened ...there is no personal interpretation on whether or not president kennedy got his fucking head blown off ...however if you where to ask if Martin Luther King was a "nicer guy" or smarter than Malcom X it would probably behoove you to have actually been around the two or have seen them in action to give an articulate piece of commentary on the question.....obviously

I swear y'all niggas fucking fail every time you try to sound smart
 
JDSTAYWITIT.;7230465 said:
Jonah 2.0;7230085 said:
By that logic it would be impossible to have an "intelligent conversation" about any historical events unless we were there to actually witness them happening. That's deep.

Your logic is idiotic ....basketball analysis is not absolute like most historical fact ...there are many things that are subjective and up to personal interpretation

There is no personal interpretation about whether or not the civil war happened ...there is no personal interpretation on whether or not president kennedy got his fucking head blown off ...however if you where to ask if Martin Luther King was a "nicer guy" or smarter than Malcom X it would probably behoove you to have actually been around the two or have seen them in action to give an articulate piece of commentary on the question.....obviously

I swear y'all niggas fucking fail every time you try to sound smart

Not idiotic at all. Just not what you wanted to read. You obviously have delusions of grandeur which lead you to believe that you are superior to everyone who disagrees w/ your assertions. That's cool. I'm not here to have a pissing contest w/ anyone. The fact is that there are numbers, since you are the stat guy, which tell us that these men are most definitely some of the greatest to ever do it. You can bring up the context of era/competition and that argument definitely has merit but the argument that we can't possibly vote for Wilt as one of the greatest for the simple fact that we didn't see him play has no merit at all.

Back to the question at hand, does The Stilt finally get a spot now that he's up by 1 in the voting?
 
Last edited:
Jonah 2.0;7230537 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;7230465 said:
Jonah 2.0;7230085 said:
By that logic it would be impossible to have an "intelligent conversation" about any historical events unless we were there to actually witness them happening. That's deep.

Your logic is idiotic ....basketball analysis is not absolute like most historical fact ...there are many things that are subjective and up to personal interpretation

There is no personal interpretation about whether or not the civil war happened ...there is no personal interpretation on whether or not president kennedy got his fucking head blown off ...however if you where to ask if Martin Luther King was a "nicer guy" or smarter than Malcom X it would probably behoove you to have actually been around the two or have seen them in action to give an articulate piece of commentary on the question.....obviously

I swear y'all niggas fucking fail every time you try to sound smart

Not idiotic at all. Just not what you wanted to read. You obviously have delusions of grandeur which lead you to believe that you are superior to everyone who disagrees w/ your assertions. That's cool. I'm not here to have a pissing contest w/ anyone. The fact is that there are numbers, since you are the stat guy, which tell us that these men are most definitely some of the greatest to ever do it. You can bring up the context of era/competition and that argument definitely has merit but the argument that we can't possibly vote for Wilt as one of the greatest for the simple fact that we didn't see him play has no merit at all.

Back to the question at hand, does The Stilt finally get a spot now that he's up by 1 in the voting?

Done deal
 
Jonah 2.0;7230537 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;7230465 said:
Jonah 2.0;7230085 said:
By that logic it would be impossible to have an "intelligent conversation" about any historical events unless we were there to actually witness them happening. That's deep.

Your logic is idiotic ....basketball analysis is not absolute like most historical fact ...there are many things that are subjective and up to personal interpretation

There is no personal interpretation about whether or not the civil war happened ...there is no personal interpretation on whether or not president kennedy got his fucking head blown off ...however if you where to ask if Martin Luther King was a "nicer guy" or smarter than Malcom X it would probably behoove you to have actually been around the two or have seen them in action to give an articulate piece of commentary on the question.....obviously

I swear y'all niggas fucking fail every time you try to sound smart

Not idiotic at all. Just not what you wanted to read. You obviously have delusions of grandeur which lead you to believe that you are superior to everyone who disagrees w/ your assertions. That's cool. I'm not here to have a pissing contest w/ anyone. The fact is that there are numbers, since you are the stat guy, which tell us that these men are most definitely some of the greatest to ever do it. You can bring up the context of era/competition and that argument definitely has merit but the argument that we can't possibly vote for Wilt as one of the greatest for the simple fact that we didn't see him play has no merit at all.

Back to the question at hand, does The Stilt finally get a spot now that he's up by 1 in the voting?

You clearly sound insecure ...I'm simply making an Argument ...if you can counter intelligently than do so ... Claiming I have a "superiority complex" because your logic fails when scrutinized is a cop out and a poor excuse.. Improve your argument improve your ability to articulate yourself and you wouldn't make poor assessments ...

Niggas said they don't care about "stupid stats" and they use the "eye test" lol ...but now your using your entire assement of a players ability based on statistical analysis?

Hmmmmmm Lol...which one is it confused ass niggas?

And you can vote for whoever you like ...you can obviously say whatever you like ...that's not what I said ...dont create strawmans my guy (it illustrates that your argument is weak) what I'd said was how can you have an intelligent conversation a substantive converstaion comparing things you've never seen...
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
36
Views
2
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…