tru_m.a.c;4052660 said:lol no they wouldn't
this shit would be perfect for Boise
they'd expose the big 10/big east and ACC
Hate to say it but its possibly a lot of truth in this statement
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tru_m.a.c;4052660 said:lol no they wouldn't
this shit would be perfect for Boise
they'd expose the big 10/big east and ACC
tru_m.a.c;4052660 said:lol no they wouldn't
this shit would be perfect for Boise
they'd expose the big 10/big east and ACC
tru_m.a.c;4052660 said:lol no they wouldn't
this shit would be perfect for Boise
they'd expose the big 10/big east and ACC
coop9889;4052337 said:SEC Champ
Big XII Champ
Pac 12 Champ
Big Ten Champ
ACC Champ
Big East Champ
2 At Large
Seedings determined by poll or BCS...
Ekscape;4051402 said:Nigga, you do realize these are kids in college; they ain't gonna extend the post season that damn long to have a 16 team playoff; or they'd have to cut back to season drastically and also you gotta realize they have pretty much the whole month of December off; i'm telling you it will come down to a top 4 team playoff maybe... and I mean a big maybe a top 8 team which is doubtful...
Also... NFL vs. College exhibition games?... HELLL NAW LOL AHAHAHAHAHA...This is football, a full contact sport... those kids will get killed out there, it won't even be close I think you're overstating the skill level of some of these college teams... The Colts from this year will blow Alabama away with ease... with ease
c.b.b.;4054587 said:I'd like a playoff system, but just throwing in conference champs won't solve everything.
To me Bama was the best team this year, but made some rare mistakes vs LSU in their first game.
If only the conference champs were allowed to play in the NCAA title playoffs, Bama wouldn't have even made it.
I think the seeding should be done by rank and maybe 6 teams should play for the NCAA 'ship
Monizzle14;4054374 said:at the end of the day i want a playoff system but lets be honest a playoff would not have solved the quality of a game for the natty title game. Lets say LSU or Bama played another team like OSU....it still would have been 1 sided. Sure the build up to the final would have been good but the final game would have been a blow out. When hOe S U can't even beat stanford by a decent size difference even they would have gotten blown out by bama or LSU if they made it to the title game.
c.b.b.;4054587 said:I'd like a playoff system, but just throwing in conference champs won't solve everything.
Monizzle14;4055452 said:Fuck giving every confrence an auto bid because outside the SEC a conference's power and talent changes up and down by the year. I am a uconn fan and i don't think any big east team deserves to be in a playoff unless they literally go undefeated or have a quality loss. The ACC is just as much of a joke too outside 1 team that gets lucky for a year. Being at the top of a conference should give you a bonus but shouldn't guarantee you a spot in a playoff that will be 8 teams or less.
Ekscape;4055573 said:Like I said... today they are reporting it will be A FOUR GAME PLAYOFF... Colin Cowherd had me dying this morning though, he said "if people think this is gonna stop teams from bitching it won't... just the 5th seeds gonna bitch instead of 3rd... Biggie said more money more problems... well Uncle Colin says mo' teams mo' problems"
coop9889;4055596 said:6 conference champs + 2 at large is best option.
When people say this... it's obvious they are only looking for flair. The national championship should be between the best two teams, period. Not "what gives people the best looking game possible" Foh...
A playoff would be a win-win for everyone.
This year, more people wanted to see Ok State/LSU right?
Well, Bama/LSU would play the OK States/Oregon's of the league at some point in the playoffs. (The "exciting game" everyone wants, including you)
The national championship would be between the top 2 teams, more than likely.
That's why you have 2 at large teams as well.
While this is true, not every conference is equal, you still have to at least reward the winners of said conference and give them a shot. If they lose, it's expected... if they win... its an upset. And you know sports world/media loves upsets.
Winning your conference, regardless of how good/bad it is is an accomplishment.
blackrain;4050548 said:I think the quality of the game more than anything pissed people off
Monizzle14;4055697 said:but LSU and bama were the top 2 teams i personally wanted to see because they were in fact the best 2 teams. They are teams that actually have quality defenses and offenses that could shit on any team outside of the confrence including if either lsu or bama played osu. Look at bama and lsu's points per game against teams outside of the SEC to see how great they really are. OSU couldn't defend stanmford so bama or lsu would have blown them out by the 2nd or 3rd easily....these niggas pretty much lost to standford too (Baring the choke) .
coop9889;4055795 said:I agree completely with everything you are saying.
I've BEEN saying no one can compete with either.
But a playoff would work because it would produce the game everyone wanted to see (Bama/LSU vs OK St) and it would produce a worthy champ game (Bama vs LSU)
s2jepeka;4055832 said:No it wouldnt smh
There is no playoff ever created that pairs 1 vs 2 before the final
1 vs 4 = LSU def. Stanford
2 vs 3 = Bama def. OSU
1 vs 2- LSU vs Bama...back at square 1
Im waitin for somebody please explain this to me
coop9889;4055849 said:What are you saying.
People are mad because they got a 'boring' epic defense vs epic defense battle... didn't see an war of great offense vs great defense or great offense vs great offense.
Bama vs Ok state produces that... doesn't matter if its not in the final game or not.
I dont get what you are not getting.