BREAKING NEWS: BCS set to install playoff system; as early as NEXT YEAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
tru_m.a.c;4052660 said:
lol no they wouldn't

this shit would be perfect for Boise

they'd expose the big 10/big east and ACC

Hate to say it but its possibly a lot of truth in this statement
 
Last edited:
tru_m.a.c;4052660 said:
lol no they wouldn't

this shit would be perfect for Boise

they'd expose the big 10/big east and ACC

Those conferences are already exposed. Big East and ACC will never be shit and Big Ten has 2-3 good schools
 
Last edited:
and be clear the country did not want to see that horrible title game that happend on Monday had one of the worst ratings of BCS title game history...
 
Last edited:
coop9889;4052337 said:
SEC Champ
Big XII Champ
Pac 12 Champ
Big Ten Champ
ACC Champ
Big East Champ
2 At Large

Seedings determined by poll or BCS...

This is what i've wanted. the 2 at large also leaves room for the Alabama, Arkansas, and Stanford's of 2011
 
Last edited:
at the end of the day i want a playoff system but lets be honest a playoff would not have solved the quality of a game for the natty title game. Lets say LSU or Bama played another team like OSU....it still would have been 1 sided. Sure the build up to the final would have been good but the final game would have been a blow out. When hOe S U can't even beat stanford by a decent size difference even they would have gotten blown out by bama or LSU if they made it to the title game.
 
Last edited:
I'd like a playoff system, but just throwing in conference champs won't solve everything.

To me Bama was the best team this year, but made some rare mistakes vs LSU in their first game.

If only the conference champs were allowed to play in the NCAA title playoffs, Bama wouldn't have even made it.

I think the seeding should be done by rank and maybe 6 teams should play for the NCAA 'ship
 
Last edited:
Ekscape;4051402 said:
Nigga, you do realize these are kids in college; they ain't gonna extend the post season that damn long to have a 16 team playoff; or they'd have to cut back to season drastically and also you gotta realize they have pretty much the whole month of December off; i'm telling you it will come down to a top 4 team playoff maybe... and I mean a big maybe a top 8 team which is doubtful...

Also... NFL vs. College exhibition games?... HELLL NAW LOL AHAHAHAHAHA...This is football, a full contact sport... those kids will get killed out there, it won't even be close I think you're overstating the skill level of some of these college teams... The Colts from this year will blow Alabama away with ease... with ease

bruh it's do-able trust

trim the regular season from 12 games to 10, and start the season earlier...............you could easily schedule 15 games (4 playoffs and one exhibition)

let the best of college play the worst team in the NFL in an exhibition after the Superbowl using only juniors and seniors

trust that mofos would watch that shit...................

and not only will it give a legitimate incentive to pay college players, then all this pre-draft talk will be totally different

plus NFL teams will have to step it up so that they won't purposely lose games to get an advantage in the draft...............no professional player wants to be known as part of a professional team that lost to a college team haha
 
Last edited:
c.b.b.;4054587 said:
I'd like a playoff system, but just throwing in conference champs won't solve everything.

To me Bama was the best team this year, but made some rare mistakes vs LSU in their first game.

If only the conference champs were allowed to play in the NCAA title playoffs, Bama wouldn't have even made it.

I think the seeding should be done by rank and maybe 6 teams should play for the NCAA 'ship

co sign they need to have the best teams period weather 4 team or 8 team playoffs. Fuck giving every confrence an auto bid because outside the SEC a conference's power and talent changes up and down by the year. I am a uconn fan and i don't think any big east team deserves to be in a playoff unless they literally go undefeated or have a quality loss. The ACC is just as much of a joke too outside 1 team that gets lucky for a year. Being at the top of a conference should give you a bonus but shouldn't garuntee you a spot in a playoff that will be 8 teams or less. They aint about to have a 16 game playoff i garuntee you that.
 
Last edited:
Like I said... today they are reporting it will be A FOUR GAME PLAYOFF... Colin Cowherd had me dying this morning though, he said "if people think this is gonna stop teams from bitching it won't... just the 5th seeds gonna bitch instead of 3rd... Biggie said more money more problems... well Uncle Colin says mo' teams mo' problems"
 
Last edited:
6 conference champs + 2 at large is best option.

Monizzle14;4054374 said:
at the end of the day i want a playoff system but lets be honest a playoff would not have solved the quality of a game for the natty title game. Lets say LSU or Bama played another team like OSU....it still would have been 1 sided. Sure the build up to the final would have been good but the final game would have been a blow out. When hOe S U can't even beat stanford by a decent size difference even they would have gotten blown out by bama or LSU if they made it to the title game.

When people say this... it's obvious they are only looking for flair. The national championship should be between the best two teams, period. Not "what gives people the best looking game possible" Foh...

A playoff would be a win-win for everyone.

This year, more people wanted to see Ok State/LSU right?

Well, Bama/LSU would play the OK States/Oregon's of the league at some point in the playoffs. (The "exciting game" everyone wants, including you)
The national championship would be between the top 2 teams, more than likely.

c.b.b.;4054587 said:
I'd like a playoff system, but just throwing in conference champs won't solve everything.

That's why you have 2 at large teams as well.

Monizzle14;4055452 said:
Fuck giving every confrence an auto bid because outside the SEC a conference's power and talent changes up and down by the year. I am a uconn fan and i don't think any big east team deserves to be in a playoff unless they literally go undefeated or have a quality loss. The ACC is just as much of a joke too outside 1 team that gets lucky for a year. Being at the top of a conference should give you a bonus but shouldn't guarantee you a spot in a playoff that will be 8 teams or less.

While this is true, not every conference is equal, you still have to at least reward the winners of said conference and give them a shot. If they lose, it's expected... if they win... its an upset. And you know sports world/media loves upsets.

Winning your conference, regardless of how good/bad it is is an accomplishment.
 
Last edited:
Ekscape;4055573 said:
Like I said... today they are reporting it will be A FOUR GAME PLAYOFF... Colin Cowherd had me dying this morning though, he said "if people think this is gonna stop teams from bitching it won't... just the 5th seeds gonna bitch instead of 3rd... Biggie said more money more problems... well Uncle Colin says mo' teams mo' problems"

i missed colin cause of extra work trainning but just caught the last hour on my break....his show on a decent or great day is something i listen to nearly every day
 
Last edited:
coop9889;4055596 said:
6 conference champs + 2 at large is best option.

When people say this... it's obvious they are only looking for flair. The national championship should be between the best two teams, period. Not "what gives people the best looking game possible" Foh...

A playoff would be a win-win for everyone.

This year, more people wanted to see Ok State/LSU right?

Well, Bama/LSU would play the OK States/Oregon's of the league at some point in the playoffs. (The "exciting game" everyone wants, including you)

The national championship would be between the top 2 teams, more than likely.

That's why you have 2 at large teams as well.

While this is true, not every conference is equal, you still have to at least reward the winners of said conference and give them a shot. If they lose, it's expected... if they win... its an upset. And you know sports world/media loves upsets.

Winning your conference, regardless of how good/bad it is is an accomplishment.

but LSU and bama were the top 2 teams i personally wanted to see because they were in fact the best 2 teams. They are teams that actually have quality defenses and offenses that could shit on any team outside of the confrence including if either lsu or bama played osu. Look at bama and lsu's points per game against teams outside of the SEC to see how great they really are. OSU couldn't defend stanmford so bama or lsu would have blown them out by the 2nd or 3rd easily....these niggas pretty much lost to standford too (Baring the choke) .
 
Last edited:
blackrain;4050548 said:
I think the quality of the game more than anything pissed people off

People was pissed before they even played the Championship.

If you beat Iowa St. you wouldn't have to worry about being left out.

This plus 1 system was proposed and supported by the SEC/ACC some years ago, but the same teams that are bitching about being left out were the same ones against the plus 1 and now are all of a sudden in favor of a plus 1. LMAO!!!
 
Last edited:
Division II has a playoff every year, and they have no problems. These sacks of shits are more worried about the money/bowls instead of defining a true Champion.
 
Last edited:
1)somebody explain to me how a 16 team playoff is fair or even needed?

A possible 16 teams for a 12 game season? That makes no sense. The NFL is 8 teams after 16 games

2)Since when did we look at college football as arena football? If it was all about entertainment, why not have Oregon play Houston every year?

3)The game was boring? Well gee, if there was a 4 team playoff and LSU mopped Stanford, and Bama mopped OSU....wouldnt we still end up right where we started?

What about the years when 1 vs 2 is undefeated vs undefeated?

I'm just gon sit back and watch this shyt that people been clamoring for blows up.
 
Last edited:
Monizzle14;4055697 said:
but LSU and bama were the top 2 teams i personally wanted to see because they were in fact the best 2 teams. They are teams that actually have quality defenses and offenses that could shit on any team outside of the confrence including if either lsu or bama played osu. Look at bama and lsu's points per game against teams outside of the SEC to see how great they really are. OSU couldn't defend stanmford so bama or lsu would have blown them out by the 2nd or 3rd easily....these niggas pretty much lost to standford too (Baring the choke) .

I agree completely with everything you are saying.

I've BEEN saying no one can compete with either.

But a playoff would work because it would produce the game everyone wanted to see (Bama/LSU vs OK St) and it would produce a worthy champ game (Bama vs LSU)
 
Last edited:
coop9889;4055795 said:
I agree completely with everything you are saying.

I've BEEN saying no one can compete with either.

But a playoff would work because it would produce the game everyone wanted to see (Bama/LSU vs OK St) and it would produce a worthy champ game (Bama vs LSU)

No it wouldnt smh

There is no playoff ever created that pairs 1 vs 2 before the final

1 vs 4 = LSU def. Stanford

2 vs 3 = Bama def. OSU

1 vs 2- LSU vs Bama...back at square 1

Im waitin for somebody please explain this to me
 
Last edited:
s2jepeka;4055832 said:
No it wouldnt smh

There is no playoff ever created that pairs 1 vs 2 before the final

1 vs 4 = LSU def. Stanford
2 vs 3 = Bama def. OSU

1 vs 2- LSU vs Bama...back at square 1

Im waitin for somebody please explain this to me

What are you saying.

People are mad because they got a 'boring' epic defense vs epic defense battle... didn't see an war of great offense vs great defense or great offense vs great offense.

Bama vs Ok state produces that... doesn't matter if its not in the final game or not.

I dont get what you are not getting.
 
Last edited:
coop9889;4055849 said:
What are you saying.

People are mad because they got a 'boring' epic defense vs epic defense battle... didn't see an war of great offense vs great defense or great offense vs great offense.

Bama vs Ok state produces that... doesn't matter if its not in the final game or not.

I dont get what you are not getting.

Idgaf what the people want, honestly....the 'people' are the same people who vote and fuck up Pro Bowls an All Star games every year....

I want whats fair. And Bama (one of the best defenses ...ever) vs LSU (one of the toughest schedules ever) was fair...the outcome is irrelevant. This is not the TRuman show...you dont get to script your finish....As if NC games dont typoically end in blowouts anyway smh

Meanwhile OSU lost to ....Iowa State smh
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
76
Views
101
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…