manofmorehouse;9236347 said:not_osirus_jenkins;9236303 said:fortyacres;9235888 said:AggyAF;9235863 said:However there's also her role in Haiti and Libya as well as her disgusting pandering
OH , now you guys care about Haiti and Libya lmao .
She is just like any other politician the good and the bad.
That's why alot of us say fuck politics. It's not about helping it's about who has the biggest donor behind them. That's not politics. Thats a transaction ensuring favoritism at the donors request.
I agree with u....partially. I feel like politicians are going to play to their base because it ensures job security. Donors provide the funding that allows them to get their message out to the masses. So how does the poor man affect politics?? By actually voting in large numbers. People question why gays and Mexicans are getting an actual platform and having specific bills passed.
They're voting in much larger numbers than us for candidates that represent their interests. We'll see shit we don't like and say "that's why I don't vote". As a politician, are u more inclined to angry voters or angry protesters saying they don't vote?? Leaving out morals because we are talking about politicians. That's honestly all it boils down to. Voting in your city, state, and presidential elections in droves for people that speak for u.
On one hand you're trying to tote Hillary's record with Black people and on the other hand you're arguing "well she ain't did shit for Black people cause y'all don't vote...she's a politician so what you expect?" And I absolutely agree with what you're getting at but kind of have a different point of view. I think abstaining from voting would be more beneficial than voting unconditionally...it's like why wine and dine a slut when she just gonna give it up anyway..out of the goodness of your heart? Nah smash her keep it moving...call her back up when you tryna smash again. That's how Democrats view the Black voting block. And why shouldn't they?