Bill Gates: There's no scientific explanation of how it (the universe) came about!

[J-GUTTA]

@DoUwant2o2Heaven? is that your denomination? Protestant?

Co Sign @DevilsFavoriteClown same with the rest if the religious books period. To me if you have a strong faith cool but your an idiot to think these books are 100 percent accurate teachings of thousands of years ago.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

Oceanic forgot to take his meds tonight. He acting up. LOL. got me bout to fall out of my chair.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

 

[Bodhi]

The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Thanks for walking into that. Since the Bible was written by man and God had no part in its authorship, even by divine intervention as some Christians claim, it is subject to error and since it is subject to error, it can be concluded that the whole concept of a creator is false.

That's not accurate. If you were to write a biography on Malcolm X, does the fact that you are not Malcolm X make his existence that much more false?

The Bible has its errors, but it also has great messages to it, and that was the point. I'm not religious, but I do believe in God. Exactly how does the bible being subject to error make a concept of a divine deity false?

That's all we needed.

But the infallibility of the Bible means that there is a chance that the concept of a personal creator god is false. Since that concept is highly unlikely and does not line up with our daily experience, it is safe to assume that ancient man also got that wrong when pondering the universe.

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

If that's the case, how do you explain books that the Catholic Church purposely left out the bible?

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

@DoUwant2o2Heaven? is that your denomination? Protestant?

Co Sign @DevilsFavoriteClown same with the rest if the religious books period. To me if you have a strong faith cool but your an idiot to think these books are 100 percent accurate teachings of thousands of years ago.

Yes, I am protestant. Baptist to be particular

 

[Bodhi]

Oceanic forgot to take his meds tonight. He acting up. LOL. got me bout to fall out of my chair.

I'm clean from both meds and drugs. Never taken drugs in my life. How about you??

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Thanks for walking into that. Since the Bible was written by man and God had no part in its authorship, even by divine intervention as some Christians claim, it is subject to error and since it is subject to error, it can be concluded that the whole concept of a creator is false.

That's not accurate. If you were to write a biography on Malcolm X, does the fact that you are not Malcolm X make his existence that much more false?

The Bible has its errors, but it also has great messages to it, and that was the point. I'm not religious, but I do believe in God. Exactly how does the bible being subject to error make a concept of a divine deity false?

That's all we needed.

But the infallibility of the Bible means that there is a chance that the concept of a personal creator god is false. Since that concept is highly unlikely and does not line up with our daily experience, it is safe to assume that ancient man also got that wrong when pondering the universe.

How does the bible being subject to error negate the existence of god?

 

[Bodhi]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

okay so explain to me how

1. The sun is not a star

2. The earth and moon were created before the stars

and

3. The moon is a light

don't worry. I'll wait. Lol

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

If that's the case, how do you explain books that the Catholic Church purposely left out the bible?

The Pseudepigrapha weren't inspiried writings, thus the reason why they were never cannonized.

 

[Bodhi]

The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Thanks for walking into that. Since the Bible was written by man and God had no part in its authorship, even by divine intervention as some Christians claim, it is subject to error and since it is subject to error, it can be concluded that the whole concept of a creator is false.

That's not accurate. If you were to write a biography on Malcolm X, does the fact that you are not Malcolm X make his existence that much more false?

The Bible has its errors, but it also has great messages to it, and that was the point. I'm not religious, but I do believe in God. Exactly how does the bible being subject to error make a concept of a divine deity false?

That's all we needed.

But the infallibility of the Bible means that there is a chance that the concept of a personal creator god is false. Since that concept is highly unlikely and does not line up with our daily experience, it is safe to assume that ancient man also got that wrong when pondering the universe.

How does the bible being subject to error negate the existence of god?

I just told you.

1. The bible is subject to error.

2. The bible says there is a god and that god is the creator.

3. The bible could be wrong about there being a god.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

Oceanic forgot to take his meds tonight. He acting up. LOL. got me bout to fall out of my chair.

I'm clean from both meds and drugs. Never taken drugs in my life. How about you??

"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." 2 Corinthians 5:17

Will you be made new today my friend?

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

okay so explain to me how

1. The sun is not a star

2. The earth and moon were created before the stars

and

3. The moon is a light

don't worry. I'll wait. Lol

Your questions have already been answered. Go back and re-read this thread. You hitting that cheeba? Your Short term memory is shot bruh, bruh.

 

[J-GUTTA]

@DoUwant2o2Heaven? is that your denomination? Protestant?

Co Sign @DevilsFavoriteClown same with the rest if the religious books period. To me if you have a strong faith cool but your an idiot to think these books are 100 percent accurate teachings of thousands of years ago.

Yes, I am protestant. Baptist to be particular

Jesus no pun intended it like 1 in Cali my G don't you have 18 hours of Church tomorrow?

Sidenote

Loved Catholic Church growing up 1 hour no more go home god be with you. 45 minutes if there were playoff games on.

 

[Bodhi]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

okay so explain to me how

1. The sun is not a star

2. The earth and moon were created before the stars

and

3. The moon is a light

don't worry. I'll wait. Lol

Your questions have already been answered. Go back and re-read this thread. You hitting that cheeba? Your Short term memory is shot bruh, bruh.

Unless you edited one of your posts, there was never an explanation for either of those that made sense.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

@DoUwant2o2Heaven? is that your denomination? Protestant?

Co Sign @DevilsFavoriteClown same with the rest if the religious books period. To me if you have a strong faith cool but your an idiot to think these books are 100 percent accurate teachings of thousands of years ago.

Yes, I am protestant. Baptist to be particular

Jesus no pun intended it like 1 in Cali my G don't you have 18 hours of Church tomorrow?

Sidenote

Loved Catholic Church growing up 1 hour no more go home god be with you. 45 minutes if there were playoff games on.

It's almost 230am, but I work the graveyard shift so i'm here till 6am. Thankfully they have night service church that I go to at 7pm. Praise God!

 

[Rasta.]

The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Idiot!

 

[Jabu_Rule]

So we just gonna move one of the most important discoveries ever found in science but keep the opinion of a man that isn't even in any particular field of science to offer a valid opinion on the subject regardless of his wealth and intelligence in other non related areas. Interesting.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

So is the Bible infallible or nah?

Yes.

okay so explain to me how

1. The sun is not a star

2. The earth and moon were created before the stars

and

3. The moon is a light

don't worry. I'll wait. Lol

Your questions have already been answered. Go back and re-read this thread. You hitting that cheeba? Your Short term memory is shot bruh, bruh.

Unless you edited one of your posts, there was never an explanation for either of those that made sense.

"If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how can you believe if I tell you heavenly things?" John 3:12

Maybe if I actually qoute scripture, the truth will start ringing through your head. Good grief.

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Thanks for walking into that. Since the Bible was written by man and God had no part in its authorship, even by divine intervention as some Christians claim, it is subject to error and since it is subject to error, it can be concluded that the whole concept of a creator is false.

That's not accurate. If you were to write a biography on Malcolm X, does the fact that you are not Malcolm X make his existence that much more false?

The Bible has its errors, but it also has great messages to it, and that was the point. I'm not religious, but I do believe in God. Exactly how does the bible being subject to error make a concept of a divine deity false?

That's all we needed.

But the infallibility of the Bible means that there is a chance that the concept of a personal creator god is false. Since that concept is highly unlikely and does not line up with our daily experience, it is safe to assume that ancient man also got that wrong when pondering the universe.

How does the bible being subject to error negate the existence of god?

I just told you.

1. The bible is subject to error.

2. The bible says there is a god and that god is the creator.

3. The bible could be wrong about there being a god.

I think you take genesis way too literal