Bill Gates: There's no scientific explanation of how it (the universe) came about!

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
I know some poor soul is going to eat up the ignorace of Oceanic, so in order to combat said ignorance I will give scripture (truth) in order to guide those who lack understanding.

"Look up into the heavens. Who created all the stars? He brings them out like an army, one after another, calling each by its name. Because of his great power and incomparable strength, not a single one is missing." Isaiah 40:26

God calls every star by it's own unique name. The star that God placed in our solar system is named the Sun. Thus the reason why there is a distinction given in Genesis 1:16 between the greater light (the sun) and the other stars God made.

"God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars." Genesis 1:16

Amen.
 
Nah.. If no distinction were to be made, it would have said, "and he made all other stars", not "and he made the stars".

The Bible places emphasis on god creating "the stars" as if they are completely different in essence from the sun.

Even then, the order in which the earth, the moon and the stars came into being is entirely incorrect.
 
Oceanic ;6889410 said:
Nah.. If no distinction were to be made, it would have said, "and he made all other stars", not "and he made the stars".

The Bible places emphasis on god creating "the stars" as if they are completely different in essence from the sun.

Even then, the order in which the earth, the moon and the stars came into being is entirely incorrect.

You're grasping for air bruh, bruh. Quit while you're still behind. And get on the road that leads to eternal life. Will you accept the soon coming King today?
 
And the Bible doesn't even call the sun by any name in that passage. It says two great lights, obviously unaware that one of those lights is one of the stars it mentions in the following verse and the other is not a light at all.
 
Oceanic ;6889413 said:
And the Bible doesn't even call the sun by any name in that passage. It says two great lights, obviously unaware that one of those lights is one of the stars it mentions in the following verse and the other is not a light at all.

This is what I get for trying to side step my original position. The more you talk the more you confirm my original stance.

"If you can't even understand earthly things, how can you begin to understand heavenly things?"

But hey, at least truth is being proclaimed. Amen.
 
Da Riddler;6884220 said:
He's catholic , /thread

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6884253 said:
Da Riddler;6884220 said:
He's catholic , /thread

Why?

Eh fuck it I see yall awake tonight.

According to some of the "GOOD CHRISTIANS" Catholics are not Christians because Catholics don't read the correct bible. And since Bill Gates admits to attending Catholic church doesn't that void his comment about it making sense to believe in God.

Also isn't it voided because as Catholics there isn't an "accepting of Jesus Christ" as you say is the only way to be allowed into Heaven?

 
Last edited:
J-GUTTA;6889421 said:
Da Riddler;6884220 said:
He's catholic , /thread

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6884253 said:
Da Riddler;6884220 said:
He's catholic , /thread

Why?

Eh duck it I see yall awake tonight.

According to some of the "GOOD CHRISTIANS" Catholics are not Christians because Catholics don't read the correct bible. And since Bill Gates admits to attending Catholic church doesn't that void his comment about it making sense to believe in God.

Also isn't it voided because as Catholics there isn't an "accepting of Jesus Christ" as you say is the only way to be allowed into Heaven?

1. Catholics have the same Bible as protestants, the only thing that is different is that they include the Apocraphya.

2. Catholics believe in the same God as me and all other protestants, the Lord Jesus Christ.

3. Catholics have questionable practices (traditions), but so do protestants.

4. I stand on what the word of God says, regardless of what denomination a person might be affliated with. Which is that the only way one gets into heaven is by being born-again by saving faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Nothing less and nothing more. Amen.
 
The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.
 
DevilsFavoriteClown;6889428 said:
The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Thanks for walking into that. Since the Bible was written by man and God had no part in its authorship, even by divine intervention as some Christians claim, it is subject to error and since it is subject to error, it can be concluded that the whole concept of a creator is false.
 
"All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful to teach us what is true and to make us realize what is wrong in our lives. It corrects us when we are wrong and teaches us to do what is right." 2 Timothy 3:16

Human beings wrote the scriptures as they were directed by the in-dwelling presence of the Holy Spirit (God).

 
Last edited:
Oceanic ;6889432 said:
DevilsFavoriteClown;6889428 said:
The Bible wasn't written by God himself, it was written by man. Whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. Early man saw the moon as a source of light, because it does light up the earth during a clear sky without city lights.

Why would early man not distinguish between the sun and the stars? The Sun was our source of all light, stars in the sky were not.

This fool wants humans thousands of years ago to have degrees in physics and astronomy. The Bible was written by man, not God.

Thanks for walking into that. Since the Bible was written by man and God had no part in its authorship, even by divine intervention as some Christians claim, it is subject to error and since it is subject to error, it can be concluded that the whole concept of a creator is false.

That's not accurate. If you were to write a biography on Malcolm X, does the fact that you are not Malcolm X make his existence that much more false?

The Bible has its errors, but it also has great messages to it, and that was the point. I'm not religious, but I do believe in God. Exactly how does the bible being subject to error make a concept of a divine deity false?
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
694
Views
40
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…