Inglewood_B
New member
DaBull;9016346 said:why is Prime Shaq only the 3 peat years? that's kind of convenient
in 2003 as O/P mentioned, lost to spurs (Duncan/old robinson)
Hakeem gave him work in the finals, but he was young.....so is prime only when he was winning chips? that sound like new rules.
it dont matter , not trying to derail thread, Prime shaq was bigger than everyone and left alot to be desired. He never won rebounding title despite being the biggest, strongest, most dominant force in the post.
Hakeem was much more skilled and won with much less
Why is prime Hakeem only 93-95? Pretty convenient that Michael Jordan was gone/rusty those years.
I mean come on fam, you really wanna play that stupid game?
Last edited: