'Beauty And The Beast' (2017) Emma Watson and Dan Stevens

[TheGOAT]

Lion King overrated AF

 

[TheGOAT]

So.... Parents who plan on taking their kids to this.

The movie is going to have Disneys "1st exclusively gay moment"

Gastons dork sidekick LeFou will be openly gay and the director promises a moment in the film exclusively to highlight this.

Im all for gay people doing them... But keep this shit outa the kids movies.

 

[atribecalledgabi]

I always thought lefou was gay when I was little anyway so no fucks given over here. They won't be doing anything explicit like kissing and shit so...*shrug*

 

[TheGOAT]

I always thought lefou was gay when I was little anyway so no fucks given over here. They won't be doing anything explicit like kissing and shit so...*shrug*

As a young child i did not think he was gay while watching it. I prolly didnt even know what "gay" was when i was young as hell and would watch it.

But they also didnt do anything too "in your face". Often in these kids films they have lil jokes kinda hidden that parents get but kids dont even realize are there.

But the director promising an "exclusively gay moment" is odd. I just hope there isnt anything too shocking that my son is gonna be confused about.

A few months back he saw Bruce Jenner on TV and asked if it was a man or a woman.... That kinda shit is very confusing to a pre-schooler.

 

[VulcanRaven]

So.... Parents who plan on taking their kids to this.

The movie is going to have Disneys "1st exclusively gay moment"

Gastons dork sidekick LeFou will be openly gay and the director promises a moment in the film exclusively to highlight this.

Im all for gay people doing them... But keep this shit outa the kids movies.

This is not even necessary. WTF is the point of a gay moment? FOH.

 

[fortyacres]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

 

[TheGOAT]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

 

[atribecalledgabi]

I always thought lefou was gay when I was little anyway so no fucks given over here. They won't be doing anything explicit like kissing and shit so...*shrug*

As a young child i did not think he was gay while watching it. I prolly didnt even know what "gay" was when i was young as hell and would watch it.

But they also didnt do anything too "in your face". Often in these kids films they have lil jokes kinda hidden that parents get but kids dont even realize are there.

But the director promising an "exclusively gay moment" is odd. I just hope there isnt anything too shocking that my son is gonna be confused about.

A few months back he saw Bruce Jenner on TV and asked if it was a man or a woman.... That kinda shit is very confusing to a pre-schooler.

I always thought lefou was a sissy and he had a crush on Gaston when I was little lol. It obviously didn't mean much then as it does now that I'm grown and know what gay means and all those implications, but the shit was there for me young.

I looked up the director's comment on it cuz I agree the "exclusively gay moment" thing is weird...but he just said that he's dancing with a guy in a sequence where everybody is dancing with everybody. So it's still a nfg for me. It woulda been better left unsaid tho.

 

[fortyacres]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

ummm, thats not exclusive to you because you have children dude , thats a cop out. We all have families ,siblings , friends etc.

Yall are comfortable with a young girl falling in love with a fictitious fantasy monster but a gay character (in which we dont really know how they will choose to portray that) really is out of order ? word ?

Its pretty simple Disney made a decision , if it bothers someone that much dont watch it , there is the book and the cartoon version and a litany of Disney movies to pick from , than people being up in arms about this.

 

[TheGOAT]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

ummm, thats not exclusive to you because you have children dude , thats a cop out. We all have families ,siblings , friends etc.

Yall are comfortable with a young girl falling in love with a fictitious fantasy monster but a gay character (in which we dont really know how they will choose to portray that) really is out of order ? word ?

Its pretty simple Disney made a decision , if it bothers someone that much dont watch it , there is the book and the cartoon version and a litany of Disney movies to pick from , than people being up in arms about this.

There were no "gay characters" in the original.

My only beef is that its a kids movie. Why add it?

If its as small as a lil dance scene like Gabi said than the only reason the director said anything was to get ppl talking about the film.... Because he knew it was controversial.

Kids seeing gay stuff get confused and ask lots of questions. I dont think pre-schoolers need to be thinking about all the different sexuality preferences because Disney shoved it in their face.

 

[soul rattler]

I always thought of Lefou as just a mindless lacky sidekick that antagonists usually surround themselves with.

Hell, it's no different than these celebrities and politicians. If Lefou is gay, probably half of Donald Trump's cabinet is too.

 

[TheGOAT]

I guess it being a live action musical... That field of work is dominated by gay people.

Making a character openly gay was probably an ode to themselves

 

[fortyacres]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

ummm, thats not exclusive to you because you have children dude , thats a cop out. We all have families ,siblings , friends etc.

Yall are comfortable with a young girl falling in love with a fictitious fantasy monster but a gay character (in which we dont really know how they will choose to portray that) really is out of order ? word ?

Its pretty simple Disney made a decision , if it bothers someone that much dont watch it , there is the book and the cartoon version and a litany of Disney movies to pick from , than people being up in arms about this.

There were no "gay characters" in the original.

My only beef is that its a kids movie. Why add it?

If its as small as a lil dance scene like Gabi said than the only reason the director said anything was to get ppl talking about the film.... Because he knew it was controversial.

Kids seeing gay stuff get confused and ask lots of questions. I dont think pre-schoolers need to be thinking about all the different sexuality preferences because Disney shoved it in their face.

If they get confused thats your que to explain it to them as a parent should , as they are confused and ask many questions about anything else. There are also gay parents with children too, so why dont they deserve representation in this ever changing world? (people would be up in arms nowadays if disney movies lack a diverse cast as they rightly should.), and like i said its one movie out of dozens released or being released for people to focus too much on this.

Moreover what have they shoved in your face ? no-one has seen the movie yet and dont even know how that issue is gonna be addressed. So heterosexual romance is okay to have pre-schoolers ?

 

[TheGOAT]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

ummm, thats not exclusive to you because you have children dude , thats a cop out. We all have families ,siblings , friends etc.

Yall are comfortable with a young girl falling in love with a fictitious fantasy monster but a gay character (in which we dont really know how they will choose to portray that) really is out of order ? word ?

Its pretty simple Disney made a decision , if it bothers someone that much dont watch it , there is the book and the cartoon version and a litany of Disney movies to pick from , than people being up in arms about this.

There were no "gay characters" in the original.

My only beef is that its a kids movie. Why add it?

If its as small as a lil dance scene like Gabi said than the only reason the director said anything was to get ppl talking about the film.... Because he knew it was controversial.

Kids seeing gay stuff get confused and ask lots of questions. I dont think pre-schoolers need to be thinking about all the different sexuality preferences because Disney shoved it in their face.

Moreover what have they shoved in your face ? no-one has seen the movie yet and dont even know how that issue is gonna be addressed. So heterosexual romance is okay to have pre-schoolers ?

Like i said if its just a dance scene than this is obvious the director tryn to start a buzz.

If its something explicit like a man on man kissing scene than yes i would file that as "shoving it in our face"

And Yes heterosexual romance is alot more normal than gay romance like it or not. Seeming as how thats how everyone was brought into this world. Thats not a shot at gay people either its just how you explain to a child how babies are made.

 

[TheGOAT]

 

[TheGOAT]

The triplettes are disappointing

 

[soul rattler]

Damn them bitches is fugly.

The cartoon versions >>>

 

[Broddie]

Looking like Bill Hader in drag. They can't ever deny that the director is gay.

 

[fortyacres]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

ummm, thats not exclusive to you because you have children dude , thats a cop out. We all have families ,siblings , friends etc.

Yall are comfortable with a young girl falling in love with a fictitious fantasy monster but a gay character (in which we dont really know how they will choose to portray that) really is out of order ? word ?

Its pretty simple Disney made a decision , if it bothers someone that much dont watch it , there is the book and the cartoon version and a litany of Disney movies to pick from , than people being up in arms about this.

There were no "gay characters" in the original.

My only beef is that its a kids movie. Why add it?

If its as small as a lil dance scene like Gabi said than the only reason the director said anything was to get ppl talking about the film.... Because he knew it was controversial.

Kids seeing gay stuff get confused and ask lots of questions. I dont think pre-schoolers need to be thinking about all the different sexuality preferences because Disney shoved it in their face.

Moreover what have they shoved in your face ? no-one has seen the movie yet and dont even know how that issue is gonna be addressed. So heterosexual romance is okay to have pre-schoolers ?

Like i said if its just a dance scene than this is obvious the director tryn to start a buzz.

If its something explicit like a man on man kissing scene than yes i would file that as "shoving it in our face"

And Yes heterosexual romance is alot more normal than gay romance like it or not. Seeming as how thats how everyone was brought into this world. Thats not a shot at gay people either its just how you explain to a child how babies are made.

clearly everyone was not brought up that way (heterosexual) , or there would be no gay people anywhere in the world in all recorded history to this point.

Its only abnormal if you make it out to be , you can either be indifferent , roll with the program , teach your kids (same way you teach them about anything complicated racism/racial policing, current political climate, & religion etc) or be left behind coz the world that yall want aint gonna be the current or future reality.

 

[TheGOAT]

This movie will make money with or without fake outrage niggaz , Disney dont really need some of yall $20 breh.

I dont feel what i expressed is fake outrage. And my son likes the cartoon &wants to see this so i will be taking him.

That said i guess if you dont have kids yourself we cant discuss this topic at hand.

ummm, thats not exclusive to you because you have children dude , thats a cop out. We all have families ,siblings , friends etc.

Yall are comfortable with a young girl falling in love with a fictitious fantasy monster but a gay character (in which we dont really know how they will choose to portray that) really is out of order ? word ?

Its pretty simple Disney made a decision , if it bothers someone that much dont watch it , there is the book and the cartoon version and a litany of Disney movies to pick from , than people being up in arms about this.

There were no "gay characters" in the original.

My only beef is that its a kids movie. Why add it?

If its as small as a lil dance scene like Gabi said than the only reason the director said anything was to get ppl talking about the film.... Because he knew it was controversial.

Kids seeing gay stuff get confused and ask lots of questions. I dont think pre-schoolers need to be thinking about all the different sexuality preferences because Disney shoved it in their face.

Moreover what have they shoved in your face ? no-one has seen the movie yet and dont even know how that issue is gonna be addressed. So heterosexual romance is okay to have pre-schoolers ?

Like i said if its just a dance scene than this is obvious the director tryn to start a buzz.

If its something explicit like a man on man kissing scene than yes i would file that as "shoving it in our face"

And Yes heterosexual romance is alot more normal than gay romance like it or not. Seeming as how thats how everyone was brought into this world. Thats not a shot at gay people either its just how you explain to a child how babies are made.

clearly everyone was not brought up that way (heterosexual) , or there would be no gay people anywhere in the world in all recorded history to this point.

Its only abnormal if you make it out to be , you can either be indifferent , roll with the program , teach your kids (same way you teach them about anything complicated racism/racial policing, current political climate, & religion etc) or be left behind coz the world that yall want aint gonna be the current or future reality.

Many of people who are gay were traumatized or molested as children. Not all but a good portion. (Same goes for women who choose to go into porn)

But anyway i do plan on teaching my children about the the police, racism, politics, religions, & the different sexualities... But my only point was that preschool isnt the time for it.

Im not tryn have the most "woke" preschooler. He can enjoy his childhood innocense until at least elementary school.