bambu;4692639 said:
@Jaded Righteousness.....
You evolutionary niggas want to have your cake and eat it too....
Yall want to call bullshit on the evolution of the races, but follow the "science" that establishes it.....
If it has been proven that "all humans are the same" that also means that the process of evolution has failed to encompass human beings....
Or there is some sort of "divine intervention"........
I know most of the niggas in your camp do not know what to do with a book and would rather argue about what you assume the theory of evolution means.....
However, there is literature both old and new that describes the details of these theories.....
You can continue to argue about what you assume the theory of evolution in relationship to humans means....
However, I assure that your European counterparts do not share your faith in the assumption that there is no evolution of the races.....
So here is the question again…. Does evolution stop with humans,
are we it? Or does evolution apply to the races?
If it does, the evolutionary apex of mankind is "proven" to be Nordic........
We are not unfamiliar with the work of Dr. Yakub....
However, if you have faith in his work, perhaps you could provide some evidence....
If you need more recent work check the
pioneer fund
or
P.S. These are not just pictures of books.... If you click them you are redirected to the source......
Again, we can argue your assumptions or the body of research surrounding the issue....
Bimbo I Came Here to see Who You was Sonning in Here like you said on The Other Thread! I Have Yet to see It! You in Here just Spouting your Old ass Ideas on Biology! Science Has Clearly Determined That Race is not a Factor.
You In here Talking about Yacub & Shit...Please Nigga! Calling Some Conspiracy Theorist Ideas Your own & Trying to Pass it off as Fact!
How did You come to The Conclusion, That If it has been Proven that we're all The same, Then Evolution has Failed to Encompass Human Beings or there is Divine Intervention?
Nothing Nobody in here said would make me Think they Just assume what Evolution is, Except You & ya Lil Sheep!
There is Old Old Books on What You Talking about, so it's Not Completely Baseless I Guess. It's Just all Out Dated Info.
Far as What European Counter parts are saying! Here's something from a White Guy, So I Wouldn't be so sure They don't agree
Mind You This is Such Common Shit...it was on PBS
pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-background-01-07.htm
Scientists have actually been saying for quite a while that race, as biology, doesn't exist - that there's no biological basis for race. And that is in the facts of biology, the facts of non-concordance, the facts of continuous variation, the recentness of our evolution, the way that we all commingle and come together, how genes flow, and perhaps especially in the fact that most variation occurs within race versus between races or among races, suggesting that there's no generalizability to race. There is no center there; there is no there there in the center. It's fluid.
But many individuals will say, "Well, that's okay, at least it's an approximation. It at least gives us a way to classify. Hey, you know, our head size may be continuous and shoe size may be continuous, but we developed a way to classify people by hat size and shoe size. And it kind of works. Your shoe may be a little bit crunchy but you basically know to go in and start somewhere, So what's wrong with doing it for race?"
And I'll tell you, there's a couple things that are wrong with it, where that analogy really breaks down. We've developed a universal system for thinking about hat size that's measurable, for example. So you can go into Sao Paulo Brazil and the hat merchants there have the same scale that the hat merchants do in Cambridge, Massachusetts. And we can have universality because it's objective, it's measurable, we're just measuring the circumference around the head. It doesn't change culturally from one place to another.
But think about race and its universality or lack thereof. Where is your measurement device? There is no way to measure race first. We sometimes do it by skin color. Other people may do it by hair texture. Other people may have the dividing lines different in terms of skin color. What's black in the United States is not what's black in Brazil or what's black in South Africa. What was black in 1940 is different from what is black in 2000. Certainly, with the evolution of whiteness, what was white in 1920 - as a Jew I was not white then, but I'm white now, so white has changed tremendously.
There's no stability and constancy. That's life. That's fine as social ideas go, that we all have our individual classification systems and may use them, but for science, it's death. It does not work. Science is based on generalizability, it's based on consistency, it's based on reproducibility. If you have none of that, you have junk science.
