There does not exist evidence that will make the religious believe. There exists an amazing article on talk.origins.com (
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ ). It goes through several lines of evidence. It explains why that evidence supports, how to test it, and how to falsify it. But it will not convince anyone that does not want to be convinced. I mean look at the very question the original poster placed? He came to a hip hop board for evidence on evolution and then gets pissy about people posting links. Why didn't he ask a biologist like Ken Miller? Here is 2 hours of Ken Miller intellectually prison raping Intelligent design and offer evidence in support of evolution.
None of that is going to matter. Heck I could bring up ERV's which are such a fucking slam dunk that I am actually embarrassed for people that claim evolution is false. Try looking up 'ERV evolution' on you tube. Dr Miller touches on it in his talk I linked above.
But nothing I can type here will sway Judah. He will claim it is some European plot that brought the world eugenics, Nazis, and Justin Beiber. The fact the God and religion has been often usurps by fools and mad men does not diminish the value of those ideas nor does it diminish evolution. An idea stands on its on merits.
The truly intellectually lost will bring up things like Piltdown Man or Nebraska Man. They will ignore that science exposed these frauds which highlights science's self-correcting nature but that would be devastating to their arguement. (If science exposes fraud how does Evolution stand as the central pillar of biology?) They would also have to ignore the mountain of evidence that has been discovered since Piltdown which was about 100 years ago. DNA, modern animal morphology, geographic distribution patterns all support evolution. Heck if tossed every fossil into the sea there would still be strong evidence of evolution.
Someone will bitch about a 'missing link', which is a dumb concept. If I have species A and B and find a fossil of A.1 which is transitional between A and B I now have a 'missing link' between A and A.1 and A.1 and B. The more links found the more that remain to be found. And all the while people asking for missing links will offer no explanation for the transitional forms that exists.
Take Archaeopteryx this is one of the more famous transitional forms. It has the head of a reptile (saurian actually) and the spine of a reptile. It has wings like a bird and feathers which is a trait shared with birds and dinosaurs. It has a fused clavicle (a wishbone) like a bird but and an articulated wrist with fingers. But its ankles have begun to fuse into the ankle of a modern bird. What the hell is this?
What about Hesperornis which is a flightless bird/dinosaur. If you google this one you see a skeleton very much like a bird. But it does not have a bill like a bird but rather a mouth like a dinosaur with serrated teeth like a reptiles. Though this specie did show signs of a Keratinous beak. Also its spine was not yet fused like a birds and the spine joined to the skull at its back rather than at the base like a birds.
There comes a point when the volume of evidence makes opposition foolish, evolution hit that point a 100 years ago.