Anti-Creationists......time to speak your clout

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
judahxulu;4645546 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645515 said:
judahxulu;4645151 said:
one fish? lol.

judahxulu;4645151 said:
I KNOW [there's more than one fish] U STUPID FUCK. now produce more than one species

lol you're so confused and tangled up in your own bullshit I don't even think you know

lol...yeah out of everything i said, play semantics over a fish. yeah o.k. im not confused about shit. one fish? = one SPECIES OF FISH NOT THE ACTUAL SPECIMEN QUANTITY ONE U DUMB FUCK. now...produce iron clad factual accounts of more than one alleged "transitional species" dug up in one place. hell with as many species as exist on earth now...give me an example of just 50 species. proportionally, this should be no problem.

I know that's not what you meant. That's not what I meant either. Maybe you're the dumb fuck. I already mentioned the mudskipper which is actually something (a fish) you can see moving around today that's heading toward being classified as an amphibian. We don't really have to go digging to see transitional species. I posted a link that had what you're looking for. You probably didn't read any of it which is not surprising.
 
Last edited:
bambu;4645543 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645525 said:
judahxulu;4645473 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645458 said:
judahxulu;4644945 said:
the nigga was not A REAL SCIENTIST at all.

Real scientists cosign his theory though... and you are far from a real scientist so...

so. nigga if he wasnt a scientist then theyre educated fucking morons. u cant make bullshit into truth if ur rotating on the foundation of the bullshit. what happened to logic nigga?

It's been observed and it has explained the origin of species. It's not like scientists don't test theories before cosigning them. No one had to "make" it into truth.

Ya'll niggas sure have a lot of "faith" in your scientists......

I have faith in humanity and education
 
bambu;4645578 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645534 said:
bambu;4645486 said:
I already told your ass...... Darwin attempted to formulate the scientific ideas of genectics before the discovery of the genotype......

Evolution works. Sorry.

Usually.... until an individual actually researches the subject or reads the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.....

Then it fails miserably.....

If it fails so miserably then it should be very easy for you to debunk it which by the way you haven't been able to do so far and neither has anyone else. Sorry.
 
Jaded Righteousness;4645525 said:
judahxulu;4645473 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645458 said:
judahxulu;4644945 said:
the nigga was not A REAL SCIENTIST at all.

Real scientists cosign his theory though... and you are far from a real scientist so...

so. nigga if he wasnt a scientist then theyre educated fucking morons. u cant make bullshit into truth if ur rotating on the foundation of the bullshit. what happened to logic nigga?

It's been observed and it has explained the origin of species. It's not like scientists don't test theories before cosigning them. No one had to "make" it into truth.

thats rhetoric. fossil and living animals have been observed; not evolution in real time. it is only speculated that it is the explanation for various phenomenon. People cosigning shit does not = truth. Its not like scientists dont falsify shit, make mistakes or censor their findings to support their own presuppositions. With all of that in mid, its patently dishonest for the pro-evolution crowd to act like the shit is absolute truth. if its not that, then nothing has been actually explained. only intelligent sounding speculations.

 
Jaded Righteousness;4645639 said:
bambu;4645578 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645534 said:
bambu;4645486 said:
I already told your ass...... Darwin attempted to formulate the scientific ideas of genectics before the discovery of the genotype......

Evolution works. Sorry.

Usually.... until an individual actually researches the subject or reads the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.....

Then it fails miserably.....

If it fails so miserably then it should be very easy for you to debunk it which by the way you haven't been able to do so far and neither has anyone else. Sorry.

why havent humans evolved to adapt to pollution? to the sun (skin cancer)? why do roaches develop immunities to poisons in succesive generations but we dont? hmmmm? you fail for cosigning some shit written in the colonial kill-or-cuff-anything- not-white era. who is the favored race? if youre black you know what that theory says about you right?
 
Jaded Righteousness;4645603 said:
bambu;4645543 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645525 said:
judahxulu;4645473 said:
Jaded Righteousness;4645458 said:
judahxulu;4644945 said:
the nigga was not A REAL SCIENTIST at all.

Real scientists cosign his theory though... and you are far from a real scientist so...

so. nigga if he wasnt a scientist then theyre educated fucking morons. u cant make bullshit into truth if ur rotating on the foundation of the bullshit. what happened to logic nigga?

It's been observed and it has explained the origin of species. It's not like scientists don't test theories before cosigning them. No one had to "make" it into truth.

Ya'll niggas sure have a lot of "faith" in your scientists......

I have faith in humanity and education

Your faith in education is well placed....humanity, not so much..........

 
Evolution takes place over a span of more than a day so we can't really observe it that way, Judah now can we? The correct answer to that would be no. I gave you examples of ancient and modern animals that you can research in your own time. You can refuse it all you like but if you are going to continue being childish, please stop requesting more evidence
 
The True Flesh said:
Completely exclusive of any religious beliefs.......

If your theories on human evolution are so concise, why not make the evidence more accessible ???

If your tangible physical evidence of Humans evolving from lesser primates is so convincing, it should be all up in our faces from Kindergarten through 12th grade.......but it isn't is it? Why?

I see evolution for what it is, adaptations and mutations are very observable thus making "evolution" as a whole true and scientific. But when it comes to Human evolution All of the theories are a blistering embarrassment and setback for the advancement of science as a whole.

The PROVABLE/OBSERVABLE elements of evolution are enriching to everybody who seeks knowledge......

BUT THE EMBELLISHMENTS ARE A DISSERVICE TO US ALL !!!!!

before anybody comes in here with that "the similarities between human and chimpanzee DNA is proof that humans have primitive ancestors"

THAT IS WEAK SAUCE !!!!! ....... it doesn't prove sh*t

You're gonna have to come better than that.

Longtime posters know The True Flesh......New jacks will get an introduction.

You have fish, birds, reptiles, amphibians, mammals, and arthropods.......all of which (according to darwinists) come from a common ancestor and down the line over the corse of millions of years each class morphed into the next and this is acceptable without ANY FOSSIL evidence........well i don't just accept it.

Since it is so convincing to y'all, help persuade me!

SHOW ME WHAT IT IS THAT MADE YOU BELIEVE !!!

PEACE

1. The evidence is ver accessible; Internet, libraries, book stores etc

2. Evolution is in schools to an extent. There's too much bitching from creationists side though for it to be a full blown evolution subject to be injected into schools.

3. "Evolution makes sense to me, but as for human evolution? NO! Because god made us." LOL FOH

4. No fossil evidence? LOL Bullshit. You've done no research bruh.

As for your human evolution, let me show you something, gotta find it.
 
fossil-hominid-skulls.jpg


You ask for evidence, it exists. You'll deny it though, that's cool.
 
Your own view is a speculation; the difference between your theory of creation and the theory of evolution is that evolution is supported by observable, documented, and rightly implied evidence.
 
Jaded Righteousness;4645848 said:
Evolution takes place over a span of more than a day so we can't really observe it that way, Judah now can we? The correct answer to that would be no. I gave you examples of ancient and modern animals that you can research in your own time. You can refuse it all you like but if you are going to continue being childish, please stop requesting more evidence

how long does it take? i never said one day but it has to be the point of one day when a change in a species begins to occur. u are assuming i havent researched this. yure wrong. nothing i see uses conclusive language. "it may be" "it might" "{scientists estimate" etc. keeping to the point..i never, ever, ever see an account of observing macro-evolution at all. you cant make up stories about fossils and call that observation. however educated it is..its still a guess made to fit a presupposition- the theory of evolution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
874
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…