All potential SOs should undergo a thorough background check

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Louisiana Crude;2539460 said:
I do ask questions and draw conclusion and assumptions from the answers I get but I don't worry too much past that. Whats done in the dark generally comes to the light. If they're lying or hiding stuff it will eventually come out or I will figure it out on my own generally.

Blind faith.
 
Last edited:
think;2539282 said:
They do these for jobs, why not for a person you plan to invest your all in and spend the rest of your life with? You want to be sure right? Blind faith is just not enough.

This includes:

- Giving all screennames and passwords to social networking sites
- Giving your usernames in forums and checking out your post history
- Getting full access to all IM programs and email accounts
- Access to cell phone address book and bills for call logs

This would make everything transparent between the two. If you got nothing to hide and want to build the foundations, surely this is the way to go.

yay or nay? Add on to the list.

nay.
damn, is this what the game is coming to? i wouldn't waste my time with all that insecure shit. if she with me, then she with my program right now. i'm assume a broad fucked with dudes before me. i don't want no virgin bitch.

i wanna know the important shit but i'll be damned if i'm revolving my whole life around the possibilities of outside fuckery (investigating call logs and bills and "forum post history"??lol). y'all niggas sound like y'all got guilty consciences morphing into full blown paranoia.
 
Last edited:
Louisiana Crude;2539491 said:
Maybe but I consider it to be more comfortable with myself not insecure.

I consider it to be protecting my investment, especially if I'm dead serious about it.

For the record, I'm half serious. Of course, I'm not gonna be all up in a bitch's grill. I use an approach that's in between. But you can't blame the thought of doing this full on.
 
Last edited:
meekins;2539440 said:
which prolly was just a tongue kiss on a dare. i dont see you the type to have a dirty past.

It wasnt no skeleton in the closet type shit but it did have the potential to blow up ya know
 
Last edited:
pico rivera;2539514 said:
It wasnt no skeleton in the closet type shit but it did have the potential to blow up ya know

i feel it. honesty is always necessary. it shows respect and earns trust.

with that said... you care to share yo stories with me?
 
Last edited:
he knew of 1 person i fooled around with and I dated his boss
this happened before I even knew who he was but I felt he still should know
 
Last edited:
pico rivera;2539568 said:
he knew of 1 person i fooled around with and I dated his boss
this happened before I even knew who he was but I felt he still should know

You good.

We need more females like that.
 
Last edited:
pico rivera;2539568 said:
he knew of 1 person i fooled around with and I dated his boss
this happened before I even knew who he was but I felt he still should know

WOW.. yea thats something i woulda needed to know before there was anymore advances lol.. boss, tho? smh.. lol.. hell naw.. lol

was it like a relationship, or just 1 them jumpoff relationships...

to know that the man that gives you orders and have to answer to, also layed pipe to my girl? smh... tsk tsk tsk... lol
 
Last edited:
It wasnt a serious relationship but it wasnt jumpoff, he ended up catchin feeling over the fact I stopped talkin to him for my current bf and tried to make his job complicated and start hella shit. he ended up gettin demoted tho lol
 
Last edited:
pico rivera;2539618 said:
It wasnt a serious relationship but it wasnt jumpoff, he ended up catchin feeling over the fact I stopped talkin to him for my current bf and tried to make his job complicated and start hella shit. he ended up gettin demoted tho lol

oh ok. thats all good, then. im thinking yall was getting down, forrea before you ever knew yo current. but since you chalked the boss for him, then that aint nothing to fuss about. so basically.. he took his boss' chick. thats a nice win lol.
 
Last edited:
leftcoastkev;2539478 said:
nay.

damn, is this what the game is coming to? i wouldn't waste my time with all that insecure shit. if she with me, then she with my program right now. i'm assume a broad fucked with dudes before me. i don't want no virgin bitch.

i wanna know the important shit but i'll be damned if i'm revolving my whole life around the possibilities of outside fuckery (investigating call logs and bills and "forum post history"??lol). y'all niggas sound like y'all got guilty consciences morphing into full blown paranoia.

lol...co-sign.

Yall are sounding a little over the top in here.
 
Last edited:
Thats some insecure shit if i ever saw it. Nobody's perfect so ur gonna run into a flaw in every chick.

LMAO @ seriously checking thru a chick emails and im history. Sound like one of those dudes who wanna off himself after his wifey cheat.
 
Last edited:
perks of the job is that I can run background checks on folks

now needing passwords and IP checks and phone bills is stalkerish

I just want to make sure I'm not dating a child molester.... a murderer .... someone who lies about owning his house ... etc
 
Last edited:
think;2539282 said:
They do these for jobs, why not for a person you plan to invest your all in and spend the rest of your life with? You want to be sure right? Blind faith is just not enough.

This includes:

- Giving all screennames and passwords to social networking sites
- Giving your usernames in forums and checking out your post history
- Getting full access to all IM programs and email accounts
- Access to cell phone address book and bills for call logs

This would make everything transparent between the two. If you got nothing to hide and want to build the foundations, surely this is the way to go.

yay or nay? Add on to the list.

Nay.
No.
Nuh uh.
 
Last edited:
Go back 150 years, and stuff like this was rather common. Probably not even that far back. Families were often VERY inquisitive of potential suitors for their scions, etc.

The only way to really do this well is to marry a girl young enough to not have much of a past. 20 is good
 
Last edited:
Sh0t;2540894 said:
Go back 150 years, and stuff like this was rather common. Probably not even that far back. Families were often VERY inquisitive of potential suitors for their scions, etc.

The only way to really do this well is to marry a girl young enough to not have much of a past. 20 is good

sheeeeeeeeeid... 20 is too old if you tryna catch a clean past'd chick/. these girls is having 3sums with 2 girls/dudes at 15-16 now.. getting train'd on.. swallowing groups of dudes, etc etc.. you nmine as well marry a pre-teen if you lookin for a clean past.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
47
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…