9/11 conspiracy or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
major pain;1278436 said:
Ok, so you're talking about it, now show why what you say is true.

This was already covered in the first couple of pages Pain. I would re-post them but they are not mine.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1278496 said:
This was already covered in the first couple of pages Pain. I would re-post them but they are not mine.

How do I put this...?

When you make suggestions that something is true, its kind of hard to lend credibility to what you are saying when you dont follow up with.....anything....that supports what you are suggesting.

The topics covered in the first few pages were effectively shown to have fallacies or be incorrect. So, unless you have something that shows otherwise about those topics, or something new, you're not really contributing anything to the discussion.
 
Last edited:
@major pain

How do I put this...?

When you make suggestions that something is true, its kind of hard to lend credibility to what you are saying when you dont follow up with.....anything....that supports what you are suggesting.

I put it in my post too. NORAD failed and Bush's security team failed. On top of that, the U.S. Government ignored all warnings

The topics covered in the first few pages were effectively shown to have fallacies or be incorrect. So, unless you have something that shows otherwise about those topics, or something new, you're not really contributing anything to the discussion.

Don't worry, there was nothing groundbreaking presented by anyone in this thread because everything is already out. Y'all just further explaining it. So, it's just three camps; for a conspiracy, against it, or on the fence.
It's clear that something this big took collaboration to achieve.
 
Last edited:
Yea, again, I see what you are saying, but WHERE IS THE REFERENCE POINT? Articles. links, pictures, documents, videos, ...... ya know evidence? Its EASY to say something, its not as EASY to prove it. I'm not saying you are wrong, either, I'm just saying SHOW HOW ITS TRUE.

George Bush is widely regarded as being a VERY stupid individual, to suggest he pulled this off, THIS well is giving him A TON of credit.
 
Last edited:
major pain;1278707 said:
Yea, again, I see what you are saying, but WHERE IS THE REFERENCE POINT? Articles. links, pictures, documents, videos, ...... ya know evidence? Its EASY to say something, its not as EASY to prove it. I'm not saying you are wrong, either, I'm just saying SHOW HOW ITS TRUE.

George Bush is widely regarded as being a VERY stupid individual, to suggest he pulled this off, THIS well is giving him A TON of credit.

C'mon man you know the Bush family got multiple chiefs and even though it's true that George W can't hold a candle to George H. W., he's by far smarter than people think. Moreover, it was his little brother Marvin Bush who ran security on that day. His team and NORAD made blatant failures on that day that the Bush family benefited from afterwards, as well as their constituents.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1278857 said:
C'mon man you know the Bush family got multiple chiefs and even though it's true that George W can't hold a candle to George H. W., he's by far smarter than people think. Moreover, it was his little brother Marvin Bush who ran security on that day. His team and NORAD made blatant failures on that day that the Bush family benefited from afterwards, as well as their constituents.

Ok, so I can stop clicking this thread expecting you to come up with anything other than your own words/opinion of this right?
 
Last edited:
major pain;1278871 said:
Ok, so I can stop clicking this thread expecting you to come up with anything other than your own words/opinion of this right?

all that shit is available to you and been covered over and over by reports and in this thread. I ain't doin' no extra work and if you don't like my post just write it off and go back to describing the situation in detail.

THAT SHIT WAS A CONSPIRACY
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1278903 said:
all that shit is available to you and been covered over and over by reports and in this thread. I ain't doin' no extra work and if you don't like my post just write it off and go back to describing the situation in detail.

THAT SHIT WAS A CONSPIRACY

LMAO... you havent done ANY work. I'm just asking you to validate your thoughts with something. If your ideas are the ones previously brought up is, well all of those things in question, have been debunked....
 
Last edited:
tri3w;1260010 said:
LOL........CoSign ..........i 2 thought there was some validlty into these theories, (Not alot, but it did make me think)..............i did some reseasrch and found out that none of it made sense when presented with the actual info, None of this shit actaully made sense............and the reason for the theroy made even more Less Sense, (Bush blow up the towers because he wanted money??? c'mon lets be serious lol)...........I believe The the COntury did had Forewarned knowledge about the attacks ( Several Agencies outside the US said something about a large attack on NY soil, and the CIA had prior knowlegde) and that Bush had something to do with it, but in the sesne that he was to inpet of a President to stop it, not becasue he was the leader (or a part of) some shadowly Clandestine Plot to destroy the American Gov or some bullshit like that lol

this is another reason y all this Conspiracy throeies abou Obama Tick me of because, 1) they all contradict each other, 2) they dont make any sense either when u strike them with information

Co-sign 100%
 
Last edited:
major pain;1279006 said:
LMAO... you havent done ANY work. I'm just asking you to validate your thoughts with something. If your ideas are the ones previously brought up is, well all of those things in question, have been debunked....

Whatever you say Pain. See you around......

DUN DUN DUNNNNNN!!!!!!.....................................1
 
Last edited:
BlackxChild;1280552 said:
U idiots do realize war gives the winning country money right?

Both countries profit from war bro. But we could have went to war without the towers being attacked.
 
Last edited:
BlackxChild;1280552 said:
U idiots do realize war gives the winning country money right?

the country, Not The Bushes Dumbass lol..........Read b4 u Comment
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;1280602 said:
Both countries profit from war bro. But we could have went to war without the towers being attacked.

that too..........he did order an airstrike as ssoon as he was sworn in offices.........
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1276836 said:
That shit was a Conspiracy

Securacom-Led by George W. Bush's brother Marvin Bush and responsible for security in regards to the WTC.

NORAD-Led by Dick Cheney on that day and responsible for U.S./Canada Ariel defense. Major player in the HALLIBURTON company who benefited from the attacks.

Al-Qaeda-Islamic Terrorists organization used to take the blame & led by a member of the Bin-Laden family

Bush-Bin Laden Alliance-A division of the Anglo-Arab Establishment who benefited from the attacks. This Arab family was possibly even here during the attacks.

Mossad-Possibly the actual party that carried out the attacks. An Ashkenazim Jew (Larry A. Silverstein) beat out higher bidders which is a blatant sign of the "hook up," and he preceded to take out insurance in preparation for it's destruction.

And remember, George H. W. Bush has been a CIA agent since the 60's. These cats collaborated to get this thing crackin.'

I'm not saying that the attacks weren't real, but it was planned. Tons of evidence points to this.

What are you talking about conspiring this since the 60's? How would they know how to conspire such a thing if the Towers and other Trade Centers weren't built yet? The 60's only brought about the talk, ideas and blue prints pretty much. The towers weren't done until like the early 70's. How can you conspire something before it's even built and for what reasons? Why bring down Towers 1, 2 and 7 then? You explain to me those reasons. Just by 2 planes hitting Towers 1 and 2 the American people already knew we were going to war, then the Pentagon and Shanksville situations even deepened the thought of war. There was NO need to actually bring down the towers.

You're saying Larry Silverstein also knew, that's why he did the insurance policy. Okay, I know that, I've read that and all but this would have to mean some type of insurance scam?

I mean come on really? All the theories about him and his day that was supposed to take place on 9/11 and all are such rumors. There is no proof of anything of the allegations placed on him or on the government.

The government did know, but from everything I've seen, they didn't know it was going to be on 9/11. They didn't know a date or time, they just knew it was gonna happen on American soil, be big and in 2001. They knew the possibility of airlines to be used was plausible.

Didn't like Italy call up the FBI or CIA and let them know they picked up on convo. that they were planning something in 01'? I think the notified them about it in early 01', but it wasn't taken seriously or cared for. Like I said, I only believe they knew and allowed it to happen for war purposes. Oil and what not.

I just don't see why actually destroying the Trade Centers (all) was even called for. Bombs in there don't make sense, AT ALL.

Even the Pentagon, in which a boeing 757 DID hit. I watched too many videos of eye witness footage of them all saying it was an American Airlines. Even the pieces found, which there was a lot found inside and beyond, said American Airlines and there was obvious wreckage from a plane. The front lawn is all the conspiracy theorists use as wreckage. Even firemen ON VIDEO said there were many bodies inside, just very unrecognizable you had to get close to tell.

The theory is bunk bunk bunk bunk. This is why they didn't PLAN this attack (our government) they just allowed it.
 
Last edited:
tri3w;1280615 said:
the country, Not The Bushes Dumbass lol..........Read b4 u Comment

Ain't trying to call you out or nothing man, but Bush personally as well as his friends and family have seen a substantial amount of money from going to war. Check out Micheal Moore's "Capitalism: A love story" it explains it pretty thoroughly in there.
 
Last edited:
OMG! It's so true! They have been planning this since money began being printed!!!!!

[video=youtube;SMgGC9W-ks8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMgGC9W-ks8&feature=related[/video]

Bills that all show the towers? that say Osama? That's it, I can't take it I'm sold.
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;1280738 said:
Ain't trying to call you out or nothing man, but Bush personally as well as his friends and family have seen a substantial amount of money from going to war. Check out Micheal Moore's "Capitalism: A love story" it explains it pretty thoroughly in there.

Hmmmm, gotta check that out, good look...........i was refering to My orignal Post though, thats the one he was talking about.......
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;1280760 said:
OMG! It's so true! They have been planning this since money began being printed!!!!!

[video=youtube;SMgGC9W-ks8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMgGC9W-ks8&feature=related[/video]

Bills that all show the towers? that say Osama? That's it, I can't take it I'm sold.

lol...........
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
347
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…