geechee slim;1272927 said:
The funny part is you calling me a fool. For someone with open access to the internet, and a brain, you can't put two and two together? Or are you pulling our leg to strike conversation? lol
Well are you using the internet? What conspiracies are you reading? What I'm saying is you're a fool for posting what you did, most of that was invalid. Trade Center 7 did INDEED BURN WITH FIRES.
Here it is damaged -
Here it is on fire -
There's video of it on fire and more pictures.
In air traffic control, there is no way a monitor can be "switched off" and not noticed. Air ports work just like the post office. You know where everything goes before it gets there, and hardly anything goes unnoticed. Airplanes come equiped with mic's in the cabin and deck, connected to the black box. How this goes unnoticed for the time it takes a plane to take off, change direction, and fly over new york is implossible.
It WAS SWITCHED off you incompetent fool. It was switched off then NOTICED TO BE SWITCHED OFF. They radioed the plane, no answer. It wasn't hijacked at the airport either. It was hijacked when already in motion, in the air, on to it's destination. They took over the cabin and talked over the speak to the passengers, only thing? They were radioing not on speaker on the plane. This is what struck them as confusing, then when they radioed back to the plane, no response. Then transponders were shut off. They couldn't find them easily anymore.
The pentagon is the most militant oupost in America. How a plane can come within miles of the building is a reach. Did you see that tiny hole that it left?
Yes I seen that tiny hole. Do you also know that the Pentagon was undergoing brand new construction? Re-enforcing the whole building. That side the plane hit on? Re-enforced already. But that still adds to the stupid conspiracy, why re-enforced it, oh they knew it was gonna hit on that side and that spot directly! Come on get real. Everything is twisted.
Here's a real plane, with people under it. See how big it is?
Show me a 757, not a 747. That 747 is a wide body plane. This 747 is way bigger than a 707 (which was considered when the WTC were being built) Also not to mention that plane you're showing, is a double decker plane as well. That's way bigger than the 757 that hit the Pentagon. Nice try though, tried to fool everyone.
Tell me how can two other 747 create so much force and heat to bring down three buildings, yet the Pentagon suffers only minor cuts and scratches?
Again, inconsistent information and research. 2 767's hit the WTC and 1 757 hit the Pentagon. If a 747 hit them Towers, all hell would've been worse.
I guess you've looked at the inconsistancies instead of the coincidences. You'd see this was all a plan.
I guess if you shut up now and research for a few days you'll see your own mistakes.