Well in court especially, semantics mean so much. That's why I think it would be better for the case had the witnesses never spoke to the media without council
Again, I'm not saying it changes the potential crime or conviction but it will be a point of contention from
The defense
Let me know when you decide
To stop pretending to be other people on the internet. Settle on an identity then you may get taken seriously enough to have people stop antagonizing you.
Well then it's hard to call yourself a witness if you didn't actually see it. If u did see it, and the report differs from what you claimed to see - then it will be brought up in court.
But again, the shots to the head - from a distance or otherwise- on a person who had no weapon and was not a...
The autopsy sounds much more believable than the witness statements. Either way, it still looks bad for Wilson. Not saying anyone lied, but they don't exactly match up.
Shit, who knows? But it's just going to be interesting to see how they question the credibility of the witness based on 1 piece of the story not matching up.
Brown made it past the third car. Then, “blam!” the officer took his second shot, striking Brown in the back. At that point, Johnson says Brown stopped, turned with his hands up and said “I don’t have a gun, stop shooting!”
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/eyewitness-michael-brown-fatal-shooting-missouri