Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Police gun down 17 year old unarmed black teen. (Update) Darren Wilson Not Indicted
(ob)Scene;7294782 said:Matt-;7294768 said:Max.;7294755 said:Matt-;7294732 said:Black_Excellence;7294692 said:Rasta...stop going back'n forth with the troll.
I'm only interest to see how medical evidence matches up with the testimony given by the people who came forward as eyewitnesses.
So u think eyewitnes lied?
Did that tweet say(try) he shot facing him not with his back turned away
The autopsy sounds much more believable than the witness statements. Either way, it still looks bad for Wilson. Not saying anyone lied, but they don't exactly match up.
Only thing from the witness statements that doesn't match up is which shots hit... not when he got shot at.
And outside of the kill shot--since they themselves weren't the ones being shot--they wouldn't know which shots were actually hitting unless they were the people examining the body.
Their accounts painted a picture... the autopsy provides the detail.
Well then it's hard to call yourself a witness if you didn't actually see it. If u did see it, and the report differs from what you claimed to see - then it will be brought up in court.
But again, the shots to the head - from a distance or otherwise- on a person who had no weapon and was not a treat at the time of the shooting, are damning enough
The_Jackal
New member
MR.CJ;7294806 said:https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/statuses/501218553157419008
That's the only way him getting shot in the head makes sense.
WhoisDonG???
New member
From my interpretation is he got shot the first time and start running. The second shot graze him. So he stop turned like Bruh don't shoot no more!!! And dude finish him off. MSNBC police analyst has this theory as well.
leftcoastkev
New member
Black_Excellence;7294752 said:This all started with blatant disrespect by the cop to mike brown and his friend.....officer pulls up telling them to get the fuck out of the streets... That cop had it on his mind already that he probably was going to kill.
That's the game.
Cops disrespect you, then (get angry and) claim they're in fear if you show self-respect.
Trillfate;7294783 said:stop bitching. you're a filthy bigot not unlike Darren Wilson
your sole purpose is to antagonize Us. i'll stomp a hole in your face if im ever granted the opportunity
Fuck Your Life. @matt
Let me know when you decide
To stop pretending to be other people on the internet. Settle on an identity then you may get taken seriously enough to have people stop antagonizing you.
Matt-;7294797 said:(ob)Scene;7294782 said:Matt-;7294768 said:Max.;7294755 said:Matt-;7294732 said:Black_Excellence;7294692 said:Rasta...stop going back'n forth with the troll.
I'm only interest to see how medical evidence matches up with the testimony given by the people who came forward as eyewitnesses.
So u think eyewitnes lied?
Did that tweet say(try) he shot facing him not with his back turned away
The autopsy sounds much more believable than the witness statements. Either way, it still looks bad for Wilson. Not saying anyone lied, but they don't exactly match up.
Only thing from the witness statements that doesn't match up is which shots hit... not when he got shot at.
And outside of the kill shot--since they themselves weren't the ones being shot--they wouldn't know which shots were actually hitting unless they were the people examining the body.
Their accounts painted a picture... the autopsy provides the detail.
Well then it's hard to call yourself a witness if you didn't actually see it. If u did see it, and the report differs from what you claimed to see - then it will be brought up in court.
But again, the shots to the head - from a distance or otherwise- on a person who had no weapon and was not a treat at the time of the shooting, are damning enough
See those the type of games white folks play that have us in this situation. To hell with the semantics. Having context we know none of this discredits an ounce of their testimonies. I do know the most credible witness, the girl picking up her coworker, never said he got shot in the back.
She said his body jerked as if he got shot. That is a smart young woman. She came into this situation more prepared than any of the other parties involved.
The_Jackal;7294808 said:MR.CJ;7294806 said:https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/statuses/501218553157419008
That's the only way him getting shot in the head makes sense.
But it would have had to have been from a distance, unless further evidence suggests otherwise
(ob)Scene;7294818 said:Matt-;7294797 said:(ob)Scene;7294782 said:Matt-;7294768 said:Max.;7294755 said:Matt-;7294732 said:Black_Excellence;7294692 said:Rasta...stop going back'n forth with the troll.
I'm only interest to see how medical evidence matches up with the testimony given by the people who came forward as eyewitnesses.
So u think eyewitnes lied?
Did that tweet say(try) he shot facing him not with his back turned away
The autopsy sounds much more believable than the witness statements. Either way, it still looks bad for Wilson. Not saying anyone lied, but they don't exactly match up.
Only thing from the witness statements that doesn't match up is which shots hit... not when he got shot at.
And outside of the kill shot--since they themselves weren't the ones being shot--they wouldn't know which shots were actually hitting unless they were the people examining the body.
Their accounts painted a picture... the autopsy provides the detail.
Well then it's hard to call yourself a witness if you didn't actually see it. If u did see it, and the report differs from what you claimed to see - then it will be brought up in court.
But again, the shots to the head - from a distance or otherwise- on a person who had no weapon and was not a treat at the time of the shooting, are damning enough
See those the type of games white folks play that have us in this situation. To hell with the semantics. Having context we know none of this discredits an ounce of their testimonies. I do know the most credible witness, the girl picking up her coworker, never said he got shot in the back.
She said his body jerked as if he got shot. That is a smart young woman. She came into this situation more prepared than any of the other parties involved.
Well in court especially, semantics mean so much. That's why I think it would be better for the case had the witnesses never spoke to the media without council
Again, I'm not saying it changes the potential crime or conviction but it will be a point of contention from
The defense
PapaDoc223
New member
In any case this will not help wilson. 2 shots to the head is pretty damning.
cannonspike1994
New member
willson will walk i have no faith in the justice system.
