Your Favorite Rapper Is Poor: The 360 Deal Edition - Refined Hype

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
I didn't Drake signed one either. Same for Minaj, I think their lawyers structured their contracts so that Cash Money/Universal couldn't yank their endorsement/show $
 
Drake signed a Jewish-Lawyer deal, he got the best deal you could ask for, he got his publishing and his masters so he good.
 
ish been goin on for a min & niggaz still talkin bout $ & trickin...

yo yo yo I juss got my advance/ spent it on a chain & a b***h/

album flopped i got dropped now im broke as s**t/

SMDH...lame niggaz thinkin fame is the answer. That just displays your ignorants on a wilder scale
 
my fav rapper been in the game to long to of signed some dumbass 360 deal. shit i dont know of any rappers that have that deal only pop stars. can someone name a rapper with a 360?
 
blackbloc;4370930 said:
my fav rapper been in the game to long to of signed some dumbass 360 deal. shit i dont know of any rappers that have that deal only pop stars. can someone name a rapper with a 360?

There are more with them than not for instance Jay Z has a 360 and that's a fact.That's the only game in town.Lupe is one of the few who refused.360 deals are the new industry standard contract

 
loch121;4371261 said:
blackbloc;4370930 said:
my fav rapper been in the game to long to of signed some dumbass 360 deal. shit i dont know of any rappers that have that deal only pop stars. can someone name a rapper with a 360?

There are more with them than not for instance Jay Z has a 360 and that's a fact.That's the only game in town.Lupe is one of the few who refused.360 deals are the new industry standard contract

Jay Z's 360 deal is different though. The label gave him 160 or 180 million up front (I think) and they get to recoup from shows/album sales etc.

I know B.o.B. didn't want to sign a 360, but I think he was persuaded to
 
Wiz Khalifa's 360 deal with Atlantic was so janky that they wouldn't let him do a song on Curren$y's last album for the low b/c it wasn't enough for the label

So shady
 
Its a shame, all its doing is seeding out the real artist though. Like the article said, if you grind it out independently you may actually be better off, then the artist who is aching for a hit single and for the label to pay his car note on that whip he couldnt afford in the first place.

Its just slavery
 
Last edited:
The 360 deal is bad for most who don't negotiate it well, but if you know what you're doing and have good lawyers, it can be a mutually benefiting deal.

If you own your masters, a majority of your publishing, and your namesake, cutting the label some bread from touring, merchandise, and endorsements can benefit both parties.

1) You're gonna get the majority of that show/endorse/movie money. But allowing the label to get a small chunk of that will not only allow them to make money, but it will allow them to back you more in marketing, as they will want you to get a much endorsement as possible so they can get more money. This means you will get more push on your music as well as any other ventures you may take on (such as acting) because the label can make money.

2) 360 contracts are not forever. If you control your masters, publishing, and your namesake, you will retain all of your royalties and will be able to make money long after you have left the initial label for another one. Meanwhile, if you are truly talented and popular with the masses, all that push that the label gave you during your run with them may be all you need to sustain work on your own or help to give you leverage in securing an even bigger deal with a new company.

Now I might be totally off base and naive in my thinking about the 360 deal, but I think labels are just trying to stay afloat and get breaded off the ventures that you would have never gotten on your own without their backing in the first place.

In an ideal situation, artists would negotiate hard to get a deal that benefits them most. And if this ends up working to save the music industry and makes it massively profitable again, we may see more quality control in mainstream music.

Think about it, nobody is going to back Future on a 360 deal for 5 or 10 years if the guy is going to be irrelevant in 2 and not get any endorsements in the process. Labels would be able to afford good A & R work again to secure talented artists, which may benefit more underground cats who deserve more shine and recognition than they are getting.

Again, I could be totally wrong. But that's just my opinion on how the 360 deal may be good for music.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
21
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…