WWE is really relying on their "old" talent. .

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Its their own fault. They say they're short on big names but have had so many chances to make one but they never follow up or stupid backstage politics get in the way
 
Most of those guys have been phased out tho.

RVD and Mark Henry basically just put guys over, Jericho is only a step above, Kane a step below.

The only real headliners on the list are Orton, Lesnar, HHH and Cena. You'd be surprised that Daniel Bryan is only a few years younger than Orton and Punk is basically the same age as Orton.

In any event, there aren't any guys in their late 20s over enough to headline yet but they have some strong potentials.
 
Most of these guys are old.. Would wrestling even function without most of those names? I mean Hogan and Flair finally stopped being on tv every week and they went until they were like 60!
 
And think about the next guys in line, ambrose, rollins and reigns are in their late 20s, so is Rhodes and Wyatt, hell, aj Lee in her late 20s too
 
They start pushing a young talent then Vince gets impatient and goes back to Orton and Cena being Champion, he doesn't allow anything to happen and Triple H gets more TV time then the actually roster, they ignore the fans and try to force u into liking what they like, I'm close to be WWE free
 
Yes they sure are. I'm tired of seeing Hulk Hogan just talk. It was crazy seeing the NWO show up and see how old they really are. I grew up watching this guys. A lot of the new talent doesn't do it for me. They should bring past wrestlers that have a little gas in the tank like Chris masters and Rene Dupree.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
22
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…