wow. Court Rules Severely Disabled Woman Wasn't Raped Because She Didn't 'Bite, Kick or Scratch' Her

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Covet;4972634 said:
RodrigueZz;4972515 said:
The Nazis performed Eugenics on the basis of ethnicity and religion which are bullshit traits to judge someone's value by. Testing organisms for intelligence, physically capability, mental stability, and other actually significant characteristics is far superior. Furthermore, to condemn the idea of eugenics solely because of Hitler is a genetic fallacy. Mon Santo seems to be putting in work in this area.

I do agree with Euthanasia though.

You really believe that eugenics should be put into place? I thought you were trying to troll me. Ugh. So do you have any average illnesses? Like Asthma? Do you have any average disabilities? Like nearsightedness or farsightedness? These things may be judged as being done away with with Eugenics.

It's not your decision. It's the decision of the government.

You also are judging on mental stability. So within what IQ range should we let live? 140 or higher sounds about right. That's genius level. Therefore only the brightest are left to stay alive.

Wait do you have a learning disability? Let's kill you off. Yes, only the brightest should survive.

Easy solution....

Now let's have the best and brightest mate. Set times for when we mate because we must match the right people together to have the correct breed of people we want! It must be at certain specific ages too because the chance for mental retardation goes up if conceived after these ages.

Do you see how asinine this is?

No illnesses or disabilities. Other than being lacking in physical capabilities, which I might be able to make up for with mental strength, I am a normal person.

I am not preaching the idea of higher end eugenics. Breeding geniuses with geniuses does not work. There is a sperm bank that deals ONLY with Nobel prize winners and they have yet to produce a Nobel prize winner. That idea is nonsense.

My idea of eugenics, is the idea of keeping the lowest end of the spectrum from out of the gene pool. It is well known that those of lower mental capability often reproduce in far greater numbers than those more intelligent. What this leads to is the conclusion that the numbers of dumb people are growing far faster than the numbers of intelligent peoples. This is an apparent bad thing. At least to me. Maybe there is a silver lining i dont see though.
 
Covet;4972667 said:
7fIG;4972654 said:
So how do you prove that she said yes / no - if there's no evidence ?

Or do you just convict the dude because she has cerebral palsy ?

I agree with you, you can't prove rape happened or didn't happen. And as Nike said, there are no details so I dunno if they did a rape kit. Even if there is tearing in the vaginal area.... that doesn't mean rape. So no one knows. But I wouldn't immediately say it was consensual.

And with that arguement you cant immediately say it was rape b

Either way, the original trial must have been hell for the prosecutor and defense

 
Also the idea of eugenics based entirely around genetics completely neglects the concept of 'nurture' from the age old nature vs nurture debate. Conditioning and education can be very good tools to mold humans into valuable and highly functional members of society. But not everyone should be allowed to participate in this ritual - some people should not be allowed to raise kids.
 
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.

You sound like a fucking asshole, but I'm sure you knew that when you posted this shit.
 
Covet;4972682 said:
Stopitfive;4972674 said:
Stopitfive;4972674 said:
Covet;4972670 said:
atribecalledgabi;4972669 said:
the intellectual capacity of a 3 year old......so 3 year olds know about sex?

I did but I was a different kind of 3 year old haha

what the fuck did u just post, white?

My parents taught me the birds and the bees from a young age. No one else I know has taught about that at 3 years old.

RodrigueZz;4972677 said:
RodrigueZz;4972677 said:
Covet;4972634 said:
RodrigueZz;4972515 said:
The Nazis performed Eugenics on the basis of ethnicity and religion which are bullshit traits to judge someone's value by. Testing organisms for intelligence, physically capability, mental stability, and other actually significant characteristics is far superior. Furthermore, to condemn the idea of eugenics solely because of Hitler is a genetic fallacy. Mon Santo seems to be putting in work in this area.

I do agree with Euthanasia though.

You really believe that eugenics should be put into place? I thought you were trying to troll me. Ugh. So do you have any average illnesses? Like Asthma? Do you have any average disabilities? Like nearsightedness or farsightedness? These things may be judged as being done away with with Eugenics.

It's not your decision. It's the decision of the government.

You also are judging on mental stability. So within what IQ range should we let live? 140 or higher sounds about right. That's genius level. Therefore only the brightest are left to stay alive.

Wait do you have a learning disability? Let's kill you off. Yes, only the brightest should survive.

Easy solution....

Now let's have the best and brightest mate. Set times for when we mate because we must match the right people together to have the correct breed of people we want! It must be at certain specific ages too because the chance for mental retardation goes up if conceived after these ages.

Do you see how asinine this is?

No illnesses or disabilities. Other than being lacking in physical capabilities, which I might be able to make up for with mental strength, I am a normal person.

I am not preaching the idea of higher end eugenics. Breeding geniuses with geniuses does not work. There is a sperm bank that deals ONLY with Nobel prize winners and they have yet to produce a Nobel prize winner. That idea is nonsense.

My idea of eugenics, is the idea of keeping the lowest end of the spectrum from out of the gene pool. It is well known that those of lower mental capability often reproduce in far greater numbers than those more intelligent. What this leads to is the conclusion that the numbers of dumb people are growing far faster than the numbers of intelligent peoples. This is an apparent bad thing. At least to me. Maybe there is a silver lining i dont see though.

Well you see your idea of eugenics varies from someonelses, and so on and so on. It's a very bad thing, not a good thing.

It can be good if executed properly. You're just injecting personal bias into it.
 


However, the defense argued that there was evidence the woman could communicate by biting, kicking, screaming and gesturing. They presented testimony at trial from a home health aide who said the woman would kick and groan if she didn't get food she wanted

well here you go.
 
this thread is so fucked up.........Yahoo commenters are more civilized

and that's fucked up to imagine a dude raping a retarded chick............shit is truly sad

I wouldn't put it past some of these IC posters being willing to do the same shit :(
 
Okay Matt, it's not unusual for a 3yo to pitch a fit over food they don't want, however how would a three year old even grasp the concept of sex enough to know that it's something she should be resisting against?

Some of ya'll are just depraved.

 
MzGrahamBitches;4972795 said:
Okay Matt, it's not unusual for a 3yo to pitch a fit over food they don't want, however how would a three year old even grasp the concept of sex enough to know that it's something she should be resisting against?

Some of ya'll are just depraved.

that's not the argument. the argument is that she was not able to kick/scream...that argument was shot down by the eyewitness testimony saying that she is able to kick/scream. thats really all that matters.

 
Last edited:
How do they know she was not doing these things..? Is it based on testimony or is there some sort of video footage?

if it's her testimony vs his i would expect her said to be taken..
 
Not it's not all that matters..are you insane?

I don't give a shit what the argument is..if you fuck a three year old, or someone with the mentality of a three year old, they could be playing checkers, the shit is still wrong on all levels.

This motherfucker knew it was wrong, the jury knew it was wrong, the judge knew it was wrong, but now he's back on the streets while the guy caught with the oz of weed gets a year in the county.

This is why our country is fucked the fuck up..wtf happened to common sense??
 
MzGrahamBitches;4972823 said:
Not it's not all that matters..are you insane?

I don't give a shit what the argument is..if you fuck a three year old, or someone with the mentality of a three year old, they could be playing checkers, the shit is still wrong on all levels.

This motherfucker knew it was wrong, the jury knew it was wrong, the judge knew it was wrong, but now he's back on the streets while the guy caught with the oz of weed gets a year in the county.

This is why our country is fucked the fuck up..wtf happened to common sense??

well i doubt you'll ever have to worry about being called to serve on a jury
 
matt-;4972833 said:
MzGrahamBitches;4972823 said:
Not it's not all that matters..are you insane?

I don't give a shit what the argument is..if you fuck a three year old, or someone with the mentality of a three year old, they could be playing checkers, the shit is still wrong on all levels.

This motherfucker knew it was wrong, the jury knew it was wrong, the judge knew it was wrong, but now he's back on the streets while the guy caught with the oz of weed gets a year in the county.

This is why our country is fucked the fuck up..wtf happened to common sense??

well i doubt you'll ever have to worry about being called to serve on a jury

Well if this is what our country calls 'justice' that suits me just fucking fine.
 
Rape is dependent on the sex not being consensual, since that could not be proven the case was dismissed

if it does not fit you must acquit.
 
Thulsa Doom;4972818 said:
Thulsa Doom;4972818 said:
looks like females wanna talk about morals... where as the men are more interested in the word of law.

No surprise the laws the men want to uphold were written by..oh what do you know? men.

Probably men that like raping mentally handicapped women too.
 
Over here, if you're deemed to be unable to consent to sex, its constitutes rape...I'm sure that's the law here...

Anyway rape is difficult as fuck to prove, with it why a lotta raped hoes don't go to the police...

Someone's probably already said this, but no one - bar Huruma, maybe - can tell me with a straight face that a bitch with a three year old's mind can willingly and knowin' fully consent to sex
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
72
Views
87
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…