- Status
Black Boy King
New member
This dumbass nigga...
Moses saw the Angel of the LORD nigga not the Father Himself. No man has seen the Father except the Son. Whom is the Angel of the LORD in the OT
Moses saw the Angel of the LORD nigga not the Father Himself. No man has seen the Father except the Son. Whom is the Angel of the LORD in the OT
beenwize;6636222 said:
The problem with your argument is that one man's god is another man devil. So you cannot prove that the god of the bible is really a devil because whoever i call deity is my god therefore I am not Going to believe the words of the entity that my god says is my enemy.
ALL you can do is use your own subjective opinion to critique the actions of the god of the bible.
Christ came speaking in parables because the devil is the god of this world. that's why when the Jews wanted to stone him he said you are of your father the devil and his lust will you do because they were so indoctrinated in that religion that they learned to stone anyone they thought was contrary to it.
When you read the OT you can understand why they kept on trying to stone Christ. its because of the laws Yahweh gave them about stoning ppl they think is contrary to what they have learned.
When you read the OT you can understand why they kept on trying to stone Christ. its because of the laws Yahweh gave them about stoning ppl they think is contrary to what they have learned.
Last edited:
Black Boy King
New member
This nigga jus makin up shyt lol
beenwize;6636789 said:Yahweh says surely stone with stones... Christ came with a message of if you have no sin cast the first stone. in essence he was teaching them how wrong it was to stone someone because none of us are better than the next man.
You guys don't find nothing wrong with worshipping a god that makes laws about stoning ppl because you are not of the true god. you guys are of your father the devil and his lust (i.e. stoning) will you do.
PAY ATTENTION..
The NT says that the law given at Mount Sinai put ppl in bondage. Did not the OT law make it punishable by death for not observing the Sabbath? Did not the OT law have instructions for observing the New Moon and times, seasons, and days?
Galatians 4:21-25
Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? 22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
^DID IT NOT SAY THE OT LAW PUT PPL IN BONDAGE... NOW DID NOT A SO CALLED GOD GIVE THAT LAW THAT PUT PPL IN BONDAGE? LETS SEE HERE.
Galatian 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:
Galatians 4:8 Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. 9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? 10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. 11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.
^ It says that the law at Mount Sanai put ppl in bondage and it then goes on to say that ppl were observing days, months, times, and years... now it says that you were not doing service unto the true god. by nature it was not god. if you don't understand that then you obviously want to be dumb. smh
The NT says that the law given at Mount Sinai put ppl in bondage. Did not the OT law make it punishable by death for not observing the Sabbath? Did not the OT law have instructions for observing the New Moon and times, seasons, and days?
Galatians 4:21-25
Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? 22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
^DID IT NOT SAY THE OT LAW PUT PPL IN BONDAGE... NOW DID NOT A SO CALLED GOD GIVE THAT LAW THAT PUT PPL IN BONDAGE? LETS SEE HERE.
Galatian 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:
Galatians 4:8 Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. 9 But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? 10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. 11 I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.
^ It says that the law at Mount Sanai put ppl in bondage and it then goes on to say that ppl were observing days, months, times, and years... now it says that you were not doing service unto the true god. by nature it was not god. if you don't understand that then you obviously want to be dumb. smh
Last edited:
beenwize;6637080 said:
@ the bolded you don't understand what is being said and the context in which it is being said and your whole theory that christ was somehow not affirming the deity of the god in the ot and the rightfullness of his laws for their purpose is clearly fucking stupid and betrays a pure misunderstanding of the message of christ.
the people in the church of galatians were recent converts from paganism
- Status
