yes, but really, she is not going to get elected. if she's the nominee, it's essentially the GOP writing off the 2012 election so as to not waste a legitimately electable candidate. i mean, it's my opinion, but i can't see her coming close to a win.kingblaze84;2295888 said:LOL.....the reason I would vote for Obama ONLY if Sarah Palin wins the GOP nomination is because Sister Sarah's politics are so dangerous that even Obama looks good in comparison.
so what i'm saying is that if you're afraid of GOP politics --and maybe your issue is more Palin than the GOP and this is the point i am honestly missing here-- then you're probably LESS needed on Team Obama if he's running against Palin than if he's running against ... uh ... who's the most popular Republican right now? Romney?
to be honest, though, while the latter might be more important than Libya to you (and i'm not debating that one way or the other) ... the state governments consistently relying on the federal government to balance their budgets is the same concept you're complaining about regarding the federal government relying on that debt to balance theirs.kingblaze84;2298815 said:Because America is 14 trillion dollars in debt AND we're wasting money in Afghanistan AND we're spending billions of dollars in a country that poses no threat to us WHILE state govts are cutting back on benefits and jobs.
Last edited: