which 2 franchises should be gone from nba?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
#Kew;1486636 said:
Right now, I'd say you have have to get rid of the Kings and Pacers. Reason being is that they both need new stadiums but they need the leagues help and the league is not having that. true, they both have history but their markets are dried up. they should move the pacers to las vegas, get rid of the kings and switch the grizzlies over to the eastern conference. bada bing bada boom...

Conseco Fieldhouse is only 11 years old and one of the most critically acclaimed arenas in the NBA. The Pacers have a rich tradition and haven't fell to laughing stock status, they aren't going anywhere.

I say the Kings and Hornets. Once Chris Paul leaves NO it's over.
 
Last edited:
numbaz...80's baby;1493980 said:
Vancouver lost theirs. Nigga, if yall don't start generating money they goin leave. It happened to canada already. Yall had a NBA superstar in Bosh on yo team n nobody still gave a dam about toronto. Now that Bosh is gone, ppl really goin forget they exist.

They do generate money. There's only about 8 teams most ppl care about, whats your point? When the team is winning and making a run for a playoff spot ppl will pay attention. Toronto isnt Vancouver..
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
107
Views
81
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…