Where Does Kobe's Legacy Stand If Phil Comes Back And Wins Another Ring?

[coop9889]

Wow niggas are dumb.

 

[MC The Rapper]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contending without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

So a team that makes it to the 2nd round twice and 3rd round once is not considered a contender????

not when you get swept

That doesn't matter you're one of the final 4 teams in the nba, swept or not you're a contender.... That's like sayin 07 cavs weren't a contender b/c they got swept

They won they conference but to a bigger point your saying Lebron for 5 seasons with no help had the cavaliers contending is that what your saying right now because you know what I'm gone say next.

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contending without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

So a team that makes it to the 2nd round twice and 3rd round once is not considered a contender????

not when you get swept

That doesn't matter you're one of the final 4 teams in the nba, swept or not you're a contender.... That's like sayin 07 cavs weren't a contender b/c they got swept

please, 2007 Cavs played in an extremely weak eastern conference, they were not contenders

 

[b@squ1@t redux]

 

[blu197]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contending without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

So a team that makes it to the 2nd round twice and 3rd round once is not considered a contender????

not when you get swept

That doesn't matter you're one of the final 4 teams in the nba, swept or not you're a contender.... That's like sayin 07 cavs weren't a contender b/c they got swept

please, 2007 Cavs played in an extremely weak eastern conference, they were not contenders

You niggas are stupid af, how does a team make it all the way to the nba finals and not be a contender???? Do you know what contender means??

 

[buttuh_b]

There is only one contender. Hahaha

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contending without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

So a team that makes it to the 2nd round twice and 3rd round once is not considered a contender????

not when you get swept

That doesn't matter you're one of the final 4 teams in the nba, swept or not you're a contender.... That's like sayin 07 cavs weren't a contender b/c they got swept

please, 2007 Cavs played in an extremely weak eastern conference, they were not contenders

You niggas are stupid af, how does a team make it all the way to the nba finals and not be acontender???? Do you know what contender means??

nigga, you fail to see my point. that eastern conference was so weak, the best squad was lebron and 11 nobodies. Not one team in the east that year had a chance against San Antonio. They were that good

 

[infamous114]

Lol @ they were that good...that was the weakest Spurs team that won a title...

 

[playmaker88]

yall niggas....

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

Lol @ they were that good...that was the weakest Spurs team that won a title...

the weakest spurs swept the best east team in that garbage conference that year

 

[blu197]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contending without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

So a team that makes it to the 2nd round twice and 3rd round once is not considered a contender????

not when you get swept

That doesn't matter you're one of the final 4 teams in the nba, swept or not you're a contender.... That's like sayin 07 cavs weren't a contender b/c they got swept

They won they conference but to a bigger point your saying Lebron for 5 seasons with no help had the cavaliers contending is that what your saying right now because you know what I'm gone say next.

Dude the definition for "contender" is any team that has a legit possibility to a win the title, I was just using the cavs as an example

 

[MC The Rapper]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contending without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

So a team that makes it to the 2nd round twice and 3rd round once is not considered a contender????

not when you get swept

That doesn't matter you're one of the final 4 teams in the nba, swept or not you're a contender.... That's like sayin 07 cavs weren't a contender b/c they got swept

please, 2007 Cavs played in an extremely weak eastern conference, they were not contenders

You niggas are stupid af, how does a team make it all the way to the nba finals and not be a contender???? Do you know what contender means??

They Beat the detroit pistons who had to been in 4 straight ecfs

 

[coop9889]

THIS NIGGA JUST SAID THEY WERENT CONTENDERS EVEN THOUGH THEY MADE IT TO THE NBA FINALS LMAOOOO

LOG OFF

 

[BackInWhite]

phil jackson can't stop dwight howard from bein a bitch nigga

can't stop steve nash from bein 52 years old

can't stop them from havin steve blake as a back up

can't stop them from havin the weakest bench in the history of weak benches

can't stop metta world peace from bein irrelevant on the offensive side of the ball

and can't stop pau gasol from bein softer than a baby ass

all that zen shit ain't gon mean shit

 

[WhoisDonG???]

Man some niggas logic is lacking in here. So winning 66 games and going to finals and u not a contender? Realtalk Kobe legacy already been surpass by Lebron anyway so it makes no difference one way or another.

 

[BIGbaddBLACK]

Hell yea they were a contender, but Lebron ain't passed Kobe, not yet at least.

 

[Bawse D.Lox]

This Laker squad goes through coach after coach and back to Phil when they don't work out. Doesn't matter if its Kobe & Shaq, Kobe & Bynum, or Kobe, Howard, & Nash. If Phil comes back and wins another ring, Kobe's legacy takes a big hit because it will prove he aint shit without the zen master.

You sound dumb af, jordan didn't win w/o Phil too shouldn't his legacy take a big hit aswell??

Jordan retired after playing with Phil and before him, they were already contenders.

Lakers were contenders b4 Phil too with Shaq and Kobe, point is both players have not win w/o Phil but only Kobe's legacy takes the hit???? What kinda logic is that

Well thats false they closet they ever made it without phil was the western conference finals where they got swept by the Jazz

so 97 second round 1-4 exit

98 wcf swept

99 second round 4 game swept

but a little note about phil he was on the Chicago Bulls staff in '87 so the bulls were never a contender without phil either .

So Kobe and Jordan have Phil Jackson and his Tex Winter system for their success with no Phil they wouldn't have any titles .

THE FUCK IS YA DUMB DITTY DUMB STUPID ASS, TALKIN BOUT????

HOW U MAKE IT TO THE CONFERENCE FINALS AND NOT BE A CONTENDER ?

U A STUPID MUTHAFUCKA

AND ADDING, THE BULLS MADE IT TO THE CONFERENCE FINALS WITH DOUG COLLINS AS THEIR HEAD COACH AND LOST 4-2, PHIL TOOK OVER A YEAR LATER AND LOST 4-3, BOTH TO THE PISTONS.

 

[Tommy bilfiger]

Man some niggas logic is lacking in here. So winning 66 games and going to finals and u not a contender? Realtalk Kobe legacy already been surpass by Lebron anyway so it makes no difference one way or another.

Word

At this point Lebron chasin Jordan.Kobe old news lebron been passed him up years ago

 

[Knightryder]

lol @ lebron chasing Jordan

when its a known fact that lebron plays in a weak azz conference..... i remember at one point u didnt even have to be above 500 to make it to the playoffs in the east.......

while Kobe was playing in a tougher conference , grueling it out just to make the finals.....

matter of fact, Lebron already destroyed his legacy, when he gave up being the man to play robin

on another nigga team.......

how funny is it that Lebron won his first and probably gonna be his only title during a lockout season...lol

he could never be close to mike, he not even on Kobe Radar

 

[Inglewood_B]

you niggas is funny. kobe legacy set in stone already. 2nd best SG in the history of the game