Where do we rank Paul Pierce?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

Matt-

New member
he's obviously one of the best, most consistant players from the 2000's.

that statement should do enough justice for his career.

i don't know about rankings, they dumb.

 
vs Lebron:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf9Z60uBlHY

they dont have da one where he scored 50 on him in 06 tho these 2 had some great battles
 
A sure hall of famer. He's been there for the cS and hes been a clutch player his whole career any real hoops fan has to give him props.
 
matt-;4790940 said:
he's obviously one of the best, most consistant players from the 2000's.

that statement should do enough justice for his career.

i don't know about rankings, they dumb.

yea i think when its all said nd done he'll be an under da radar star kinda like Mitch Richmond in da 90's
 
Top 10 SF

Top 5 Celtic

Top 25 overall

Consistent throughout his whole career. Ill jumper, he's clutch, his defense isn't wack, and he led his team to a ring. Also in his prime he was crazy nice.
 
Last edited:
Throwed Off Axel;4790984 said:
matt-;4790940 said:
he's obviously one of the best, most consistant players from the 2000's.

that statement should do enough justice for his career.

i don't know about rankings, they dumb.

yea i think when its all said nd done he'll be an under da radar star kinda like Mitch Richmond in da 90's

not quite that low. mitch played on bad teams in a small market. in an era completely dominated by 1 player. Even tho its all been about lebron and kobe, so many other players are getting endorsements, being hyped in the media, and getting their name out there. Pierce is a much more known commodity. So don't think its as much about him flying under anyone's radar, its more about him just not being quite as good as the greats of the last ten or so years.
 
NothingButTheTruth;4790998 said:
Top 10 SF

Top 5 Celtic

Top 25 overall

Consistent throughout his whole career. Ill jumper, he's clutch, his defense isn't wack, and he led his team to a ring. Also in his prime he was crazy nice.

co-sign all dis i just hate how his prime was wasted on Danny Ainge tryin a youth movement u got a guy averaging 27, 7 boards nd 5 assist per game nd he got da brian Scalebrine's of da world gettin rotation minutes aint much u can do bout it
 
Great player, rankings.. who knows really doesnt matter.. hes a HOF besides after the top 10 naming 11, 18, and 25... is tedious.. ..
 
Last edited:
detcatinva;4791087 said:
somewhere btw 25-30 all time. the 3rd greatest celtic of all time

think he's better than Cousy, Havlicek, mchale, parish, etc...?

i don't even know if the biggest celtics fans would put pierce in the top 3. all time
 
Last edited:
matt-;4791127 said:
detcatinva;4791087 said:
somewhere btw 25-30 all time. the 3rd greatest celtic of all time

think he's better than Cousy, Havlicek, mchale, parish, etc...?

i don't even know if the biggest celtics fans would put pierce in the top 3. all time

I really think people just arbitrarily put players at a number ... ehh hes 48 greatest player.. lol i mean what does that even mean what would he have to be to be 30th or 47.. its pointless
 
matt-;4791127 said:
detcatinva;4791087 said:
somewhere btw 25-30 all time. the 3rd greatest celtic of all time

think he's better than Cousy, Havlicek, mchale, parish, etc...?

i don't even know if the biggest celtics fans would put pierce in the top 3. all time

i got Pierce in my top 5 wit Bird Havlicheck nd Mchale ahead of him nd a lot of celtics fans wont have him at number 3 cuz he only has 1 ring but supporting cast should be factored into da celtics rankings
 
playmaker88;4791137 said:
matt-;4791127 said:
detcatinva;4791087 said:
somewhere btw 25-30 all time. the 3rd greatest celtic of all time

think he's better than Cousy, Havlicek, mchale, parish, etc...?

i don't even know if the biggest celtics fans would put pierce in the top 3. all time

I really think people just arbitrarily put players at a number ... ehh hes 48 greatest player.. lol i mean what does that even mean what would he have to be to be 30th or 47.. its pointless

well i see that side of it, when you are grouping all players.

but when you are only dealing with a handful of players, such as the alll time great celtics, it then becomes a little easier to group them into tiers, or even assign them rankings.

but yes. there isn't much difference between a 3rd, 4th, 5th best player when you are talking about all time greats.
 
Throwed Off Axel;4790967 said:
vs Melo & the knicks
=related


aye @EmmHolla if yall wanna make it to top 4 in da East make sure yall defense is betta then the atrocity displayed in these videos. Pierce is a knick killer even at age 34 lol
 
=related

rite before he sprained his MCL i wish he was more healthy dis past playoffs but he looked bad nd it showed on defensive rotations nd FG percentage
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
207
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…