What will it take to get a legitimate 3rd party candidate to the White House?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
fortyacres;c-9767596 said:
Take SuperPacs (big) Money out of politics and change the voting system to go by popular vote.

I agree on the first but disagree on the second. I don't understand this pro-popular vote trend (unless it's merely people being salty about the last election). I don't think the electoral college is perfect, but it does give states better representation. We can't have LA and NY (among a few others) decide our presidents, no?

AZTG;c-9767652 said:
Having a 3rd party president doesnt do much, but if we had a 3rd party get seats in congress and the senate, that would be nice. Lets say dems get 40%, republicans get 40%, and a third party gets 20% of the votes, now all laws have to really debated and compromises made to get majority vote on anything. Almost every other democracy functions this way. Only America has 2 parties.

I agree. It's crazy, but other countries have as many as a ten parties. I think that's great. Not disagreeing with you, but a 3d party president can get a lot of good done. I believe a president's main power is in foreign policy, and it's about damn time we change our terrible foreign policy. Most domestic issues lie in the realm of Congress and such.

Trillfate;c-9767677 said:
Never gonna happen

If I'm not mistaken, it's happened a couple of times. Anything that has happened once can happen again. But I do believe it's not likely as of now.

Kwan Dai;c-9767681 said:
So, adding more fuck niggas to the mix is now a thing?

Most of anything else is better than most of our Dem. and Rep. leaders.

caddo man;c-9767689 said:
Watch. The next move will be independents. No affiliation. Why will that work? Well if the person is truly independent they will have friends on both sides. They will be able to stick them to just one party and run ads saying he will vote this way or that way.

It is working for local and Congressional races.

Yes, that's interesting. They say the biggest party in America today and for some time now are the independents collectively.

Brian B.;c-9774297 said:
atribecalledgabi;c-9767713 said:
Term limits. Get all these 20, 30, 40 year senators and congressmen outa office so people are forced to look at new blood and new ideas more often.

I say this shit all the time

most folks wouldn't want their 80+ yr old grandma behind the wheel of a car, but see no issue w/ 80+ yr olds on the supreme court smh

And you know a lot of those geezers are probably racist, even if they were just a product of their racist times. These are our leaders.
 
WYRM;c-9768175 said:
Candidates that can be taken seriously by those outside their respective third parties.

But we've had that. Trump and Clinton couldn't be taken seriously, and they're in the two (really one)-party system. It's simply because Americans are stupid voters.

janklow;c-9773308 said:
Mister B.;d-557747 said:
As most of us know, the last election producing arguably the two worst presidential candidates in US history. So, instead of succumbing to the notion that we had to vote for one or the other, 2-3% of the voting population chose someone else.
obviously, the answer is "people being less stupid"

more seriously, you need third-party candidates succeeding on lower levels politically and building their parties and candidates who reject the major parties because their policy positions don't fit

Exactly. Americans are stupid and/or ignorant; therefore, we have a stupid and/or ignorant America. What will be needed to have a smart America? A well-informed citizenry. We haven't had that for several decades, if at all.

numbaz...80's baby;c-9773645 said:
Ppl have to stop being sheep. That's impossible

Exactly.
 
Plutarch;c-9795660 said:
Exactly. Americans are stupid and/or ignorant; therefore, we have a stupid and/or ignorant America. What will be needed to have a smart America? A well-informed citizenry. We haven't had that for several decades, if at all.
honestly, we need to start by ceasing the "vote no matter how ignorant you are, because it's your DUTY" shit.

 
The last 3rd party candidate to win was Abraham Lincoln. Hint Hint.

America's always had a 2 party system. Federalist/Anti-Federalist, Democrat/Whig, Democrat/Republican. We don't have a multi-party parliamentary system. Deal with it. I'm tired of people blaming this countries problems on the 2 Party System. Fuck that.......a corrupt, selfish, delusional, ignorant populace gets the politicians they deserve.

Niggas really think a third party would cure the evil and corruption that lies at the heart of Amerikkka?
giphy.gif


babelipsss;c-9795780 said:
The third party candidates of 2016 were no better the the standard two parties.

Gary Johnson was retarded and Jill Stein was a delusional cunt. Niggas wanna deny this, but its true.

The Greens are New Age white hippie nutjobs

The Libertarians are just Diet Republican, go read any article on a Libertarian site about Police Brutality etc, the comments are no different than the same racist shit you see on Yahoo or Breitbart

 
Last edited:
Got to make it easier to get on the ballot in all the states.

It'd take a well known rich person to pull it off, someone like the scumbag Bloomberg, running against two garbage opponents

I think we're almost there
 
It'd help if congress abolished continuing resolutions and had to pass an annual budget - stating all revenue and spending levels. In most other countries the government (most of them parliament systems) has to at least pass an annual budget.

Also remove the debt ceiling, what a retarded idea
 
Last edited:
Trillfate;c-9767677 said:
Never gonna happen

Even if it did, no party affiliation would lead to constant filibusters from both sides till their presidency would be delclared a failure by all media outlets. To which people will eat up and believe.

 
Swiffness!;c-9803030 said:
America's always had a 2 party system. Federalist/Anti-Federalist, Democrat/Whig, Democrat/Republican. We don't have a multi-party parliamentary system. Deal with it. I'm tired of people blaming this countries problems on the 2 Party System. Fuck that.......a corrupt, selfish, delusional, ignorant populace gets the politicians they deserve.
i do think there's a difference between blaming it and saying "it's a problem given how it works and we need to address it." the problem is that it's an easier target (in theory, maybe) than expecting the average voter to get better informed, possibly refrain from voting, and consider centrist/compromise alternatives.

Swiffness!;c-9803030 said:
The Libertarians are just Diet Republican, go read any article on a Libertarian site about Police Brutality etc, the comments are no different than the same racist shit you see on Yahoo or Breitbart
eh, depends on where they are, i think
 
Sion;c-9803120 said:
If your reasoning for wanting a third party candidate is because you just don't like the candidates then you're part of the problem of why people like Trump can win elections. Looking back, was Hillary really as bad as Trump ? Hell no but he was smart enough to take advantage of the situation and making y'all believe they were one of the same.
my reason for not liking the candidates is that i didn't want HRC or Trump in office, and neither represents me, so i didn't vote for either of them.

this whole argument that people who voted for neither of them are claiming "Hillary is just as bad as Trump" is false, to be honest. it's not required for people to vote for neither.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
29
Views
85
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…