What reign of terror was worst Triple H's(2002-2005) or Jeff Jarrett's(2003-2006)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Jarrett has the benefit of limited visibility. Not many people were watching TNA during that time, most people were watching RAW.
 
hhh workrate dropped

raw ratings dropped

raw buyrates were inconsistent

batista was the only one who was really put over properly imo, u can say orton but hhh got the strap right back(might have been orton fault tho)

like i said b4, maybe jeff wasnt heavyweight champ material, but he put guys over and they produced

if we were comparing how big the company is, the wwe guy wins every time.

if u prefer reign of terror, more power to u for sittin thru that shit
 
Nah Jarrett did the same shit HHH did.

He would lose the title to someone like Rhyno and then win it back a week or two later. He did the same thing to Raven.

He even wrestled a bunch of old WCW guys like Hall, Nash and DDP during that time (same as HHH wrestling Booker T, Goldberg, Steiner etc).

Jarrett didn't let anyone get more over than he was. In fact if you listened to TIJ Samoa Joe was talking about him being "held down" to the X Division (even though it was probably better for him long term).
 
would u say he didnt put those guys over at the right time tho, i think that can be said for hhh. goldberg only got the strap after first losing to hhh in the chamber, the perfect time for goldberg to win imo. and of course theres booker not gettin the win when he should have. i guess u can argue benoit got it at the right time along with batista tho

jarrett might not have wanted anyone to get over more than he was, but did that really work? wasnt there a time where x division main evented at times? and of course guys like aj had to be over as fuck, he and truth along wit jeff held the title b4 anyone else, then theres someone like christian who deserved a push but would have never got it on raw
 
The x division had it's own PPV but it was mostly the undercard title. For a large section of TNA's audience though it might as well have been the main event, nobody gave a shit about Jarrett.

When Jarrett dropped to Christian that was timely, because he was very new and extremely over. They actually let him get a decent run out of it. Probably the only decent run without Jarrett around that time...but of course...we all know what happened and how that run ended.
 
Triple Vs Shawn Michaels circa Summerslam 2002 was a great match to the casual eye. Doesn't matter who carried who. A good match is a good match.

I disagree with his promos just being I am the game uhh. (Had to do it) he's probably one of the greatest heels of my time not so much in the ring but definitely on promos (behind Paul Heyman and a few others I can't name off top)

I guess I'm biased because triple h is considered a great in my eyes and this article was very opinionated with only a couple facts in between.

That all said, get that Katie Vick bullshit, the fued with booker t rich vs poor shit and drugging stephanie and when she finally comes to, she fell into Stockholm Syndrome the FUCK out!
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
65
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…