What is your news source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
BBC

Haaretz

CBC

Mondoweiss

ForeignPolicy

Al Jazeera

Electronic Intifada

Israeli Occupation Archive

The Independent

The Economist
 
Last edited:
memphis;1065499 said:
BBC
Haaretz
CBC
Mondoweiss
ForeignPolicy
Al Jazeera
Electronic Intifada
Israeli Occupation Archive
The Independent
The Economist

Real shit, I enjoy most of those publications :tu
 
Last edited:
I'll leave you alone (i know this is actually the last thing you want, but its what you asked for) but then get over your obsession with me and move on to a new topic.
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;1066251 said:
I ain't mad, I ain't worried, I don't know how to catch feelings, but I do...apologize to you, hypocrite.

Yep, for me thinking I had the right to login and do the same thing other members here do, when people create threads about them...haha...yep, thats all, I just did what I see others doing when you do not run in their threads talking stupid like this "Obviously you are mad, caught feelings etc because of his thread. Dont worry he cant hurt you with just words on the screen. "

but I am....finding it a bit strange and self-exposing in how your sorry azz refused to answer my question regarding your hypocrisy and double-standards you enjoy burdening my login account with:

you are sickening, and devil-sent, with your hypocrisy and double-standards...so I will continue to highlight it for all to read.

Sorry, I cant keep up with all things concerning you. Yesterday, I didnt post much because I was busy handling real life things, instead of angry people like you. I think I did see the thread though, quite funny. Also, I simply ignored your "question" because it looked rhetorical.

Now, if you "aint mad", "aint worried", and "dont know how to catch feelings", then you wouldnt have made that piss poor thread about "pink panties" and then came in here doing what you claim you dont want others to do to you (name-calling), in an attempt to get "back at him". Which is why I said grow up or take it to Donkey where that behavior is welcomed.
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;1066413 said:

FACT: question wasn't rhetorical.
It was clearly about your hypocrisy, clearly pointed out your partialness, clearly exposed your double-standard which you applied to me. And, I'm betting that is why you refused to address it.

And please remember, I only created that thread because I thought I had the right to do what other members do in this forum as discussions are created about them, you know, when you just enjoy their threads and do not post this stupidily in them...silly me

LOL... ok

Fact: Stupidily is not a word.

Fact: This is not the first time you have done to someone else, what you accused them of doing. Yea yea, I get it, save the response, "but but but he did it to me first".

Suggestion, stop going around telling people your opinion is some undeniable "truth", when it is challenged, if you really want to engage in civil discussions around here. Because it really seems like all you want is for people to agree with you and everyone else is somehow "hurt" by your "facts".

For the record, I dont think I've even so much as quoted Shootem before much less cosigned him, so save the BS about being biased towards his opinion. He isnt running around telling people to stop "name-calling" and throwing insults, then go into a thread and do just that.
 
Last edited:
Well of the cable news networks I watch is CNN. FoX News yall already know the deal with them racist crackers and MSNBC be Dickriding too much imo.
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;1066750 said:
For the record, you still evaded addressing your hypocrisy. For the record, FACT: I have never ever at no time started nonsense with anyone here ON THIS WEBSITE for sure.

So your refusal to overlook what motivates any of my posts *which air out* some $hit-starter who originally swung it my way.....only solidifies how you are one sad, miserable little tunnel-visioned liar.

I know. That's why I used it.

To see if you focus on that *which you clearly understood the meaning of anyway* or focus on the issue at hand. No need to mention which one you opted for, in showing off your aimlessness.

Fact: I dont care if who started what.
You claim you dont like the insult flinging and "threaten" people who do it, and then you turn around insult people. Hypocrisy?

Clearly, CLEARLY, you spelled it like that because you thought thats how it is spelled. This is undeniable, and you are mad at this mind-blowing truth.
 
Last edited:
bornnraisedoffCMR;1067414 said:
various websites than I formulate my own opinion.

Why don't you share the websites? Formulating your own opinion based on the info you've looked at is the easy part. The hard part is knowing that I've looked at the right info.
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;1067406 said:
you know what actually you are...lol...absolutely correct kinda...lol...as I am mad at the mind blowing truth...lol...of how you REFUSE to address your blatant and overt...lol...hypocrisy that I exposed...lol...

I cant control how you will react in the face of these foundation shattering truths I put in front of you. Dont get mad at me get mad at the system.
 
Last edited:
its over: 2012!;1068365 said:
I don't know how to get mad, at the system, I'm too busy focusing my lens on those who corrupt the system;

so stand at attention and smile for the camera, major.

Ok, long as we all know you're mad.. and at nothing lol congratulations.
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;1070074 said:
Pain, what's the most Mason-y news source?

associated+press.jpg


..............

amirite?
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
59
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…