Was there a second period of slaying the sons of the Israelites?

[And Step]

Argument is bogus.

The author makes a faulty premise that the Bible is right and exact.

Prove that first, then come with it , son.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

Do believe in this as it is put you have to be both a believer in the bible and you have to believe in the Quran as well. So based of this alone do I think there was no.

Now as from a historical point of view, definently. Its very likely these sons were massively slain twice during ancient times, do I believe in anything holy involved with it no but it is very possible that it has happened in history as was recorded into both books only with a holy touch added.

 

[trackreviver]

The Quran is not contradictory. Like And Step said, the author presumes the Bible is the word of God while ignoring the fact it was written by man. Don't let this author skew your view about what the Quran says. you should actually read the Quran from front to back in a modern english translation..

 

[janklow]

The Quran is not contradictory. Like And Step said, the author presumes the Bible is the word of God while ignoring the fact it was written by man. Don't let this author skew your view about what the Quran says. you should actually read the Quran from front to back in a modern english translation..

why do i suspect the implication here is that the Bible was written by man but the Qu'ran was not...

 

[ThaChozenWun]

The Quran is not contradictory. Like And Step said, the author presumes the Bible is the word of God while ignoring the fact it was written by man. Don't let this author skew your view about what the Quran says. you should actually read the Quran from front to back in a modern english translation..

I havent read it all but I have already found a few things in the Quran i find contradictory or logically wrong.

 

[TX_Made713]

Argument is bogus.

The author makes a faulty premise that the Bible is right and exact.

Prove that first, then come with it , son.

you speak as if i said i agreed with the author, although he does make some valid points.

What he speaks on the quran is truth

 

[trackreviver]

you speak as if i said i agreed with the author, although he does make some valid points.

What he speaks on the quran is truth

The Quran has NEVER been changed. However, the bible has...many times. Even recently as last year..that being said, the original bibles were written by monks in mountains who drank alcohol while writing it [true story == philosophy 101]

The author is well just an author. he is no scholar, no bishop, no priest, no pope. His job is merely to convince you of his argument. If you want a real debate on contradictions or who's right or wrong...watch scholarly debates between Dr. Zakir and Cambell Williams.

 

[janklow]

The Quran has NEVER been changed.

certainly no man has ever been involved in written or disseminating it

 

[TX_Made713]

certainly no man has ever been involved in written or disseminating it

that nigga is dilusional

 

[And Step]

certainly no man has ever been involved in written or disseminating it

That is not in question.

 

[And Step]

I havent read it all but I have already found a few things in the Quran i find contradictory or logically wrong.

Such as?

The term logically wrong really doesn't mean much.

 

[And Step]

you speak as if i said i agreed with the author, although he does make some valid points.

What he speaks on the quran is truth

What he quotes of the quran is factual. What he infers is not neccesarily truth. He makes many inferences based of what he feels. That is called establishing a faulty premise.

It's obvious he has an ax to grind. If he really knew the quran, he would know that the stories are not written in chronological order. He seems to think it is compiled like the Bible. Besides how are you gonna talk about contradictions and confusing themes, when donkeys, snakes, and fire breathing dragons abound? Dead people rising up, Seas splitting in two. Men walking on water. He wears people down by long ass screeds.

The idiot had the nerve to say killing boy babies didn't make sense for Pharoah. Huh? Killing males is the No.1 agenda when people go to war. The Conquering people from Genghis Khan to the present have killed off the males and spared the females to impregnate and further on their agendas through their seeds. This is time proven and tested.

 

[And Step]

why do i suspect the implication here is that the Bible was written by man but the Qu'ran was not...

Because inferences, implications, and the ascribing of sinister motives are the birthright of white people.

Hey, can't knock the hustle. It works.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

Such as?

The term logically wrong really doesn't mean much.

I gotta go work out for another hour or so, once I get back I'll make a thread on it so we can discuss it, I could be way off or interpreting it wrong cause Im not as familiar with Islam as I am with Christianity but to me some things do seem off.

 

[janklow]

That is not in question.

it'd be nice if you'd tell that to the poster who claims it wasn't instead of, you know, me

Because inferences, implications, and the ascribing of sinister motives are the birthright of white people.

i don't really know the racial origin of the poster in question. but i suppose you could ask them.