ericb4prez
New member
I haven't seen the video but I heard it doesn't have sound, is that true?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BOSSExcellence;c-9582607 said:blackrain;c-9582603 said:BOSSExcellence;c-9582583 said:so he confrontin faggots and knockin out bitches!!? lol
Nah he ignored the gay dude calling him nigger to go after the chick
el oh el..
oh it jus keeps gettin better..
so he gave the bitch all the rage he had built up from the faggot!?
so we got a nigga actin out emotionally..
and niggas in here arguing emotionally??
got it..
im outta here.
Happy New Year yall!! lol
aneed123;c-9582494 said:7figz;c-9582484 said:This shit is ridiculous.
Generally, I wouldn't give a fuck about people's opinions.
Except when I can see how it would concern me / mine -
If you're telling me that a person can hit me, but I can't hit that person back.. or I need to hit this person back in a way that satisfies a bunch of biased MFs with some shaky ass criteria then I like to know.
- MFs ain't in here saying, "well he's right to hit her back, but the world ain't fair so he's going to have to deal with some bullshit...." No, instead y'all are dishing the bullshit and coming up with ways to justify it.
- (Some) MFs ain't in here saying, "well she hit him first, and he hit her back. it's a known double-standard, but he already got punished, so they need to drop this now and let him live" Nope, instead y'all are saying he's wrong because he hit her back "harder". But y'all same MFs won't respond to the posts that compare this to big dude / small dude situation..... or 2 dudes where 1 dude hits a MF and said MFs unleashes multiple cans of ass-whoopin on dude.
That shit hurts your credibility. You're supporting bullshit.
These folk really feel like u should never hit a woman no matter what they do. So they gonna bullshit beat around the bush.... it's very simple keep ur hands too urself
RB Mixon settles lawsuit, apologizes in person
Former Oklahoma running back Joe Mixon reached a civil settlement agreement Friday with the woman he punched almost three years ago.
Amelia Molitor and Mixon settled on her accusation of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Molitor also had originally sued Mixon for negligence and willful and wanton misconduct, but an Oklahoma judge dismissed those two two claims in November.
Terms of the settlement were not released.
Friday, the two sides also issued a joint statement, in which Molitor and Mixon acknowledged they met privately, giving Mixon the opportunity to apologize to Molitor directly.
"I'm thankful Mia and I were able to talk privately," Mixon said in the statement. "I was able to apologize to her one-to-one. The way I reacted that night, that's not me. That's not the way I was raised. I think she understands that.
"Talking together helps move us past what happened. I know I have to keep working to be a better person, and this is another step in that direction. I love working with kids, and I'm looking for more chances to do that kind of work. I want to lead a life that inspires them, and I hope I can lead by example from today forward."
Mixon punched Molitor in 2014 at a sandwich shop near OU's campus. Mixon accepted a plea deal and was suspended from the team his freshman season with the Sooners. Surveillance video of the altercation, which showed Mixon throwing the punch that broke four bones in Molitor's face, was released by Mixon's attorneys in December, more than two years after the incident
"I am happy we were able to bring the lawsuit to an end," Molitor said in the statement. "Joe and I were able to meet privately, without any attorneys, and talk about our experiences since that night. I am encouraged that we will both be able to move forward from here with our lives.
"From our private discussions I am satisfied that we are going to put this behind us and work towards helping others who may have found themselves in similar circumstances. I greatly appreciate his apology and I think the feelings he expressed were sincere. We both could have handled things differently. I believe if we had a chance to go back to that moment in time, the situation would not have ended the way it did.
"I'm finished talking about what happened that night with Joe. It's time to move on from that. I wish Joe the best of luck in his future."
Last season, Mixon helped lead OU to a second consecutive Big 12 championship. He also finished second nationally with 194 all-purpose yards a game.
ESPN draft analyst Mel Kiper Jr. has projected Mixon to be selected by the Cleveland Browns with the first pick in the second round of the upcoming draft. ESPN draft analyst Todd McShay also projects Mixon to go in the second round.
7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
Kat;c-9739991 said:7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
She kinda did when she said they both could have handled the situation better. I'm curious as to what this "settlement" entails.
Seems unfair since she made physical contact first, however, he could have responded a little less drastically to a shove.
I wish the video had audio.
The Lonious Monk;c-9740371 said:7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
Again, she suffered consequences for her actions when he sent her ass to the emergency room. Had he not handled it that way, maybe she'd be the one being bashed in articles. But he delivered his brand of justice and those were her consequences. Now he's got to face the consequences for what some believe to be an over-the-top reaction to the provocation. You can argue that he doesn't deserve such severe consequences. I'd agree. But to act like she's walking away unscathed from what she did is silly.
7figz;c-9740407 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9740371 said:7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
Again, she suffered consequences for her actions when he sent her ass to the emergency room. Had he not handled it that way, maybe she'd be the one being bashed in articles. But he delivered his brand of justice and those were her consequences. Now he's got to face the consequences for what some believe to be an over-the-top reaction to the provocation. You can argue that he doesn't deserve such severe consequences. I'd agree. But to act like she's walking away unscathed from what she did is silly.
Man, you going somewhere else with the shit.
I'm referring to the article which seemed like it was supposed to be the end of the situation and what was going to be a reflection by both parties on what led to the shit and what they did wrong / or what could've avoided it. In that aspect, it's lacking on her part.
In my mind, I'm thinking play by play, it seems like y'all want to skip a couple of key plays and just talk about the final score.
The Lonious Monk;c-9741734 said:7figz;c-9740407 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9740371 said:7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
Again, she suffered consequences for her actions when he sent her ass to the emergency room. Had he not handled it that way, maybe she'd be the one being bashed in articles. But he delivered his brand of justice and those were her consequences. Now he's got to face the consequences for what some believe to be an over-the-top reaction to the provocation. You can argue that he doesn't deserve such severe consequences. I'd agree. But to act like she's walking away unscathed from what she did is silly.
Man, you going somewhere else with the shit.
I'm referring to the article which seemed like it was supposed to be the end of the situation and what was going to be a reflection by both parties on what led to the shit and what they did wrong / or what could've avoided it. In that aspect, it's lacking on her part.
In my mind, I'm thinking play by play, it seems like y'all want to skip a couple of key plays and just talk about the final score.
I don't really care about her lack of acknowledgement. All I'm saying is that she suffered consequences for her actions. Articles aren't talking about her because she's a nobody. He's the one who stands to lose from this. That's why they focus on him. That will work in his favor.
Shizlansky;c-9741883 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9741734 said:7figz;c-9740407 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9740371 said:7figz;c-9739525 said:The Lonious Monk;c-9739520 said:7figz;c-9739337 said:Seems like Joe is the only one who had to accept responsibility for his actions.
You don't think the broken face was consequence enough for her actions?
Did you read the ESPN article @"stringer bell" just posted ?
Does she take any responsibility for hitting him first, hitting him twice, or hitting him at all ?
That's your answer.
Again, she suffered consequences for her actions when he sent her ass to the emergency room. Had he not handled it that way, maybe she'd be the one being bashed in articles. But he delivered his brand of justice and those were her consequences. Now he's got to face the consequences for what some believe to be an over-the-top reaction to the provocation. You can argue that he doesn't deserve such severe consequences. I'd agree. But to act like she's walking away unscathed from what she did is silly.
Man, you going somewhere else with the shit.
I'm referring to the article which seemed like it was supposed to be the end of the situation and what was going to be a reflection by both parties on what led to the shit and what they did wrong / or what could've avoided it. In that aspect, it's lacking on her part.
In my mind, I'm thinking play by play, it seems like y'all want to skip a couple of key plays and just talk about the final score.
I don't really care about her lack of acknowledgement. All I'm saying is that she suffered consequences for her actions. Articles aren't talking about her because she's a nobody. He's the one who stands to lose from this. That's why they focus on him. That will work in his favor.
No
She won in the end because her actions got her a settlement when she should have been jailed for assault