Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman Discussion Thread...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
heyslick;4613188 said:
evoljeanyes;4612278 said:
@heyslick can you or can you not logically conclude from the 911 call that Zimmerman pursued Martin and created the confrontation.

Don't act like you didn't know about that communities string of home robberies & Zimmerman wasn't just some random dude out to kill poor little innocent black children - BULL SHIT! face the real facts and stop playing games about it. This young man didn't deserve to die, but this young man was far from an innocent little child - BTW I thought people were innocent until proven guilty & most within this site have already convicted this man -

Y do some black people have to get so emotional about issues like this and when more facts come forward - they look foolish. can you say Duke University? some within that community were making threats - e.g., hang them white boys - just image if they had happened - YELP some black folks just can't resist being idiots & claiming things like white men been raping your women for 600 years on and on --- WELL BULL SHIT and it was proven and the lying bitch made up the entire story.

Even if Zimmerman was attempting to do good being neighborhood watch, He still did it wrong and went too far in his pursuit. If some creepy older guy is following you in a car, would you no be concerned?

I didn't see the same reaction from you when the so called central park rapist were exonerated.

http://gothamist.com/2008/08/23/exonerated_central_park_jogger_teen.php

Also, that Lacrosse case is suspect. They railroaded that girl. They even hid and misrepresented evidence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case#DNA_tests

it was later revealed that DNA from multiple males who were neither the lacrosse players nor Mangum's boyfriend had been found, but that these findings had been deliberately withheld from the Court and the defense

this isn't to say that black people don't get angry, but it is an extension from all the wrong doing that occurred in the past with white people getting away. I'm speaking in these specific sort of cases dealing with race.

Also, there was as many threats towards OJ Simpson. Many blacks felt he was guilty and i don't recall racism from anyone other then whites such as Mark Furhman.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_n24_v88/ai_17446892/

"During the trial arguments, we were getting death threats faxed to the court. We had used other security, but there was so much (threats) that they couldn't handle it. The Nation of Islam came to me."

So i guess it's a human thing to be emotional and angry but often times in the black community, that anger has a valid foundation.

 
Last edited:
@heyslick you are not answering my questions. No where did I say martin an innocent little black boy. If the public would use logic and admit wring doing and stop sending hundreds of thousands of dollars to help Zimmerman defend himself none of this would be that deep. I defended martin because he shouldn't have died. I continue to defend him because of comments starting with "why do all black people" and "he isn't some innocent black kid" the fuck does that have to do with this. If we weren't divided by race this conversation wouldn't be happening.
 
evoljeanyes;4613405 said:
@heyslick you are not answering my questions. No where did I say martin an innocent little black boy. If the public would use logic and admit wring doing and stop sending hundreds of thousands of dollars to help Zimmerman defend himself none of this would be that deep. I defended martin because he shouldn't have died. I continue to defend him because of comments starting with "why do all black people" and "he isn't some innocent black kid" the fuck does that have to do with this. If we weren't divided by race this conversation wouldn't be happening.

BULL!this entire tragedy was framed around a totally innocent child & the race baiters were in season and on national TV --the more it's unfolded things, & REAL facts are being told NOW about who and what this young man was truly up to & unfortunately a young died in the process - so bad kids come in all colors, how-come you never show this kind of outrage when the tables are turned. IMO if a black dude did this and the victim was white - how would you react?

 
No it wasn't. People felt like Zimmerman never being arrested was ridiculous! It was. The story unfolded information came out and Martin, though he may have been a troublemaker, on that night had done nothing to provoke Zimmerman's action. Its not about black or white. But when people that are white are choosing to shed light on Martin's character and Zimmerman's innocence it feels racially insensitive. I don't think Zimmerman would have been free had he been black. I was upset about Casey Anthony, its just people. Race enters with the handling of the cases by the media and public.
 
Lets not forget these same people have no qualms of defaming a teenager whose dead but totally ignore fact that Zimmerman is the one with the criminal past with arrests on his record...Apparantly getting suspended from school (for weed) is much more damaging to ones character than a man who was arrested several times one for fighting with a cop..

Gotta love these racist muthafuckas who sweep that shit under the rug.
 
Last edited:
GEORGE ZIMMERMAN IS HIDDEN AT A SAFE HOUSE

Wow, really? George Zimmerman, the self-proclaimed neighborhood watchman who killed Trayvon Martin, was officially released from jail again on Friday, July 6. Seminole County Judge Kenneth Lester set Zimmerman’s bond at $1 million. Zimmerman had to pay 10% ($100,000) to a bail bondsman and posted it. In a blog posted by his legal team, it states "As the terms of Mr. Zimmerman’s bond state that he must remain within Seminole County, Mr. Zimmerman’s security team has established a safe house where he can stay until a more permanent secure location can be established." Zimmerman goes free for the second time. Trayvon is dead. The saga continues.

By Brother Jesse
 
evoljeanyes;4612855 said:
@janklow Tell me what it is you believe he said?
i'm not sure it's clear, so i think it's best NOT to assume he said the most inflammatory thing possible

evoljeanyes;4612855 said:
Also, if you don't find him innocent what are we arguing about!?
you need me to repeat myself after i JUST told you? "that i thought your argument had some problems"

evoljeanyes;4612855 said:
I made the point that there is no rational way through the evidence to conclude his innocence.you gave yet to argue that.
and i think that's a stupid point, because your argument is "George Zimmerman is a racist so i know he's guilty." that is not an actual rational, evidence-based argument. that is you being outraged/emotional/whatever, deciding that he must be guilty and then presuming logic agrees with you.

there's a bunch of people in this thread who are allowing their emotions to dictate how they think the case should be handled. the way it SHOULD be handled is that he should get a fair trial, evidence should be presented, and if he's guilty, then he's guilty and he should do time. criticizing the way the case has been handled (say, if you think he should have been arrested immediately after the shooting as opposed to being released) is different than declaring "there is no rational way through the evidence to conclude his innocence."

Maximus Rex;4613025 said:
Anybody on here think that the prosecutors overcharged Zimmerman with the Murder 2? I do.
you hit them with the maximum allowable count to force that plea to a lesser count, that's all. plus, with all the public outcry, if you DON'T come at Zimmerman with a heavy charge, it's going to be seen as biased.

it'll only really fuck them up if the jury ends up thinking "2nd degree no, 3rd degree yes" and doesn't have the option to vote for the latter.
 
@janklow no family you're wrong my argument is that he went in pursuit of someone doing no wrong and as a result was beaten to the point where he felt he needed to kill. Self defense (his only argument) is out of the window because he generated the conflict.

There is no way to denounce the fact that he pursued Martin.

Your bending my conversation g. The fact that he is a racist didn't play into my argument of his guilt. Stop throwing around words to build your argument.
 
evoljeanyes;4614645 said:
@janklow no family you're wrong my argument is that he went in pursuit of someone doing no wrong-
well, starting with this, that's something we know after the fact. however, it doesn't mean that when he went after him, he did not believe Martin was doing something wrong. expecting him to know who Martin was and what Martin was doing is not actually a logical point.

evoljeanyes;4614645 said:
-and as a result was beaten to the point where he felt he needed to kill.
one man's "beaten to the point where he felt he needed to kill" might be another man's "beaten to the point where he felt the need to use deadly force"

evoljeanyes;4614645 said:
Self defense (his only argument) is out of the window because he generated the conflict.
first off, let me just say that i think Zimmerman chasing after Martin for WHATEVER reason is where this whole thing went wrong. that said, depending on HOW the conflict happened, it doesn't necessarily toss self-defense out the window (although, of course, one side of the fight is not able to testify as to how it happened). but this is why there should a reasoned trial and not an emotional rush to judgment.

evoljeanyes;4614645 said:
There is no way to denounce the fact that he pursued Martin.
check your sentence construction and/or word choice again, because you're denouncing the fact that he pursued Martin.

evoljeanyes;4614645 said:
Your bending my conversation g. The fact that he is a racist didn't play into my argument of his guilt. Stop throwing around words to build your argument.
well, let me see if i can find some prior quotes of yours i find relevant...

"EVERYONE in here is ignoring that whole "fucking coons" comment."

so, if Zimmerman being racist has nothing to do with why you see him as guilty, why does that comment matter at all? wouldn't we all be able to ignore it and STILL see him as guilty if the racism it would represent is not being factored in?

"you listen to that tape again and explain to me how he is saying anything but "fucking coon" you are not making a good argument."

same point as the previous one; just pointing out here that we're still arguing this really matters towards a determination of guilt.

"everyone isn't racist. This situation is about race."

so you're arguing this case IS about race? which would make whether or not you think Zimmerman is a racist relevant?

furthermore, again, my argument is not an argument so much as it is a criticism of your argument. i'm not rooting for any side in this because it seems like either way, there's a bunch of people taking advantage of the situation. it's unfortunate. so at this point the best i can do is give a shit about HOW people make their cases.
 
heyslick;4613463 said:
evoljeanyes;4613405 said:
@heyslick you are not answering my questions. No where did I say martin an innocent little black boy. If the public would use logic and admit wring doing and stop sending hundreds of thousands of dollars to help Zimmerman defend himself none of this would be that deep. I defended martin because he shouldn't have died. I continue to defend him because of comments starting with "why do all black people" and "he isn't some innocent black kid" the fuck does that have to do with this. If we weren't divided by race this conversation wouldn't be happening.

BULL!this entire tragedy was framed around a totally innocent child & the race baiters were in season and on national TV --the more it's unfolded things, & REAL facts are being told NOW about who and what this young man was truly up to & unfortunately a young died in the process - so bad kids come in all colors, how-come you never show this kind of outrage when the tables are turned. IMO if a black dude did this and the victim was white - how would you react?

what was he "truly up to" what facts support this theory
 
sigh.......... ill be the first to say i dont give a fuck. six black kids got followed home and shot by a BLACK PERSON a couple days ago in the city im in. this case is sone superficial ass bullshit. we can do self-genociide but a stupid ass half-white half-mexican dude shoots ONE kid out of his stupidity and everybody shitting a brick? what the fuck ever. ima need somebody to pay attention to these black zimmermans cause these kids are doing a great job killing themselves without direct help from any other color....

if the dude gets found guilty or innocent...it will do nothing to improve anybodys life at all. not at all.
 
@janklow you're just trying to argue. My sentence structure was fine. Him chasing is where self defense is on Martin's side.

I said that people ignore fucking coon as if that doesn't create a race theme in Zimmerman's motive. "They always get away" lol...

Look man it doesn't matter where the point is, it matters that he got that "beating" as result of his own misconduct.

You're breakingdown points to pad your argument.

He himself said he just lookedsketchy and that nothing wrong was happening. Lol.
 
evoljeanyes;4620819 said:
@janklow you're just trying to argue. My sentence structure was fine. Him chasing is where self defense is on Martin's side.
alright, let's do this quickly: denounce is defined as "to pronounce especially publicly to be blameworthy or evil," so "There is no way to denounce the fact that he pursued Martin" is essentially saying "there is no way to blame the fact that he pursued Martin." okay? okay.

evoljeanyes;4620819 said:
I said that people ignore fucking coon as if that doesn't create a race theme in Zimmerman's motive. "They always get away" lol...
you're saying that whether or not Zimmerman is racist "didn't play into my argument of his guilt." so why does it matter whether nor not he said that? one second, you're bashing the forum for skipping over the remark, another you're trying to claim it has nothing to do with Zimmerman's guilt.

evoljeanyes;4620819 said:
Look man it doesn't matter where the point is, it matters that he got that "beating" as result of his own misconduct.
then perhaps we could focus on this argument? or do you want to go back to the racism thing?
 
@Janklow I feel you man, I just think you have picked up on some of my argument with you and Heyslick!

Zimmerman was the initiator of the conflict. Yes he deserves a fair trial. I just think him initiating the conflict makes it pretty cut and dry. That's all.

We're all people! We should figure out how to live together harmoniously.
 
evoljeanyes;4620819 said:
@janklow you're just trying to argue. My sentence structure was fine. Him chasing is where self defense is on Martin's side.

I said that people ignore fucking coon as if that doesn't create a race theme in Zimmerman's motive. "They always get away" lol...

Look man it doesn't matter where the point is, it matters that he got that "beating" as result of his own misconduct.

You're breakingdown points to pad your argument.

He himself said he just lookedsketchy and that nothing wrong was happening. Lol.

who knows what he said it could've been "coon", but its really irrelevant. unless they were charging him w/ a hate crime. which they haven't done so far....

and i while i do believe zimmerman had his prejudices and had trayvon been white he probably would've never drawn zimmerman's suspensions....i really don't believe he purposely went looking hunt down and kill a black man.

besides that. i'm w/ you though.... from what we know to be fact, i've come to the conclusion that zimmerman chased after trayvon, lost him, they somehow came back into contact w/ each other, words were exchanged, a fight ensued, zimmerman lost the upper hand, and pulled the trigger ending trayvon's young life.....

and i def don't believe zimmerman's claim that trayvon was this blood lusting thug who was bashing his head into the concrete. especially considering all the things we've learned about gz so far. he has a history of anger issues. he has been the subject of numerous complaints from his neighbors for his aggressive tactics while acting as the unofficial neighbor hood watch. he called 911 what 41 times over the last year or so. he has lied to the courts already....imho all of this paints a picture of a troubled vigilante that got in way over his head. and now will say anything to get out of trouble...

he didn't even feel the need to go to the ER that night and his clothes were suspiciously unblemished after this supposedly brutal, life threatening beating he endured...

not to mention gz claim that trayvon circled his truck in a menacing manner sometime before he decided to run. my question is why would you get out your truck after that? and why would you not mention this bit of info to the dispatcher? lol...

really this is just a classic case of manslaughter... at the end of the day gz's actions directly or one could argue indirectly lead to the death of another human being. he should have to face some form of punishment....

 
evoljeanyes;4622405 said:
@Janklow I feel you man, I just think you have picked up on some of my argument with you and Heyslick! Zimmerman was the initiator of the conflict. Yes he deserves a fair trial. I just think him initiating the conflict makes it pretty cut and dry. That's all. We're all people! We should figure out how to live together harmoniously.
there's some bipolar stuff going on with these posts today and i don't know how i would NOT pick up on an argument between you and i, but okay, this post is fair enough.

 
nujerz84;4614038 said:
Lets not forget these same people have no qualms of defaming a teenager whose dead but totally ignore fact that Zimmerman is the one with the criminal past with arrests on his record...Apparantly getting suspended from school (for weed) is much more damaging to ones character than a man who was arrested several times one for fighting with a cop..

Gotta love these racist muthafuckas who sweep that shit under the rug.

Bingo.........
 
kingblaze84;4628500 said:
nujerz84;4614038 said:
Lets not forget these same people have no qualms of defaming a teenager whose dead but totally ignore fact that Zimmerman is the one with the criminal past with arrests on his record...Apparantly getting suspended from school (for weed) is much more damaging to ones character than a man who was arrested several times one for fighting with a cop..

Gotta love these racist muthafuckas who sweep that shit under the rug.

Bingo.........

How come both of you slid his school record under the rug OR was it conveniently overlooked? we should wouldn't wanna avoid the rest of the story,right?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
572
Views
175
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…