HustleThaDon
New member
Dont know much about comics, but I'll be checkin for this one
Last edited:
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
dalyricalbandit
Moderator
allied;1793961 said:GODDAMN that was some bullshit! I'm checking for no comic movies until The Dark Knight Rises.
................
Last edited:
bcotton2000@yahoo.com;1795489 said:I think this movie is gonna end up being good, I do think the Asgardians should be Gods instead of aliens though
They are, the whole Earth X timeline cop out was just put out there for those crackas that were hating on Stringer. Nothing I have read or seen has lead me to believe that they are following the Earth X timeline.
Last edited:
clairvoyance
New member
Im passing on all marvel movies.After iron man 2 its gonna be awhile b4 they earn my trust back. Anything less than epic im not supporting it. Marvel has a tendency to over due it with the humor though they usually get it right with the first installment. Aaaaah I dont know.
Last edited:
funkdocdamc
New member
Asgard looks sick, trailer was extra wack though.
Last edited:
Last edited:
A.J. Trillzynski
New member
critics gettin paid off for this one i can tell.. either that or it's another case of Anthony Hopkins and Natalie Portman can do no wrong so of course every critic will dickride this movie, exactly what Marvel was banking on. i heard Vanity Fair called it the best superhero movie since Spiderman. yea.. ok. Spiderman was wack though. and numerous movies have topped it since.. that's exactly the type of shit they get paid off to write.
Last edited:
ShencotheMC
New member
reaperbong;2405059 said:critics gettin paid off for this one i can tell.. either that or it's another case of Anthony Hopkins and Natalie Portman can do no wrong so of course every critic will dickride this movie, exactly what Marvel was banking on. i heard Vanity Fair called it the best superhero movie since Spiderman. yea.. ok. Spiderman was wack though. and numerous movies have topped it since.. that's exactly the type of shit they get paid off to write.
Why can't it just be a good movie? You niggas will hate on anything I swear
Last edited:
reaperbong;2405059 said:critics gettin paid off for this one i can tell.. either that or it's another case of Anthony Hopkins and Natalie Portman can do no wrong so of course every critic will dickride this movie, exactly what Marvel was banking on. i heard Vanity Fair called it the best superhero movie since Spiderman. yea.. ok. Spiderman was wack though. and numerous movies have topped it since.. that's exactly the type of shit they get paid off to write.
Quite possibly the dumbest thing written in this forum.
Last edited:
A.J. Trillzynski
New member
^lol at the emotions invested in this shit. hyperbole = feelings caught
ok just ask yourself how many good reviews you think i can find for shitty Marvel movies like Iron Man 2 or Spiderman 3? the studio is owned by Disney you're naive if you think there aren't critics getting paid to hype up a movie before it's release. 1 review literally said it's the best comic book movie since Spiderman FOH
ok just ask yourself how many good reviews you think i can find for shitty Marvel movies like Iron Man 2 or Spiderman 3? the studio is owned by Disney you're naive if you think there aren't critics getting paid to hype up a movie before it's release. 1 review literally said it's the best comic book movie since Spiderman FOH
Last edited:
reaperbong;2405405 said:^lol at the emotions invested in this shit. hyperbole = feelings caught
ok just ask yourself how many good reviews you think i can find for shitty Marvel movies like Iron Man 2 or Spiderman 3? the studio is owned by Disney you're naive if you think there aren't critics getting paid to hype up a movie before it's release. 1 review literally said it's the best comic book movie since Spiderman FOH
Your a moron, it has nothing to do with feelings or emotions. You havent seen the movie, you dont know shit about this movie. You have no proof that studios pay off critics (infact critics blast shitty movies like Iron Man 2, Spiderman 3, Transformers 2, etc etc). You have no idea if this is the best comic book movie or not....because again you havent seen it. So again you are an idiot.
Last edited:
A.J. Trillzynski
New member
wow ok calm down already, Sony was exposed for this shit 10 years back what i'm telling you is common knowledge and just because i don't have proof doesn't mean it doesn't go on nowadays that's a lame defense.
here's from the Newsweek article that exposed Sony leading to them having to pay out millions of dollars for false advertising:
here's from the Newsweek article that exposed Sony leading to them having to pay out millions of dollars for false advertising:
The real question is why Sony had to conceive the counterfeit critic to begin with, given the world of movie junkets, where normal reporting standards don’t apply. Reading the glowing newspaper-ad recommendations for even the lamest movie, you might wonder if those quoted critics are real. Unlike Manning, they are. Many are habitués of the junket circuit, an all-expenses-paid gravy train where the studios give journalists free rooms and meals at posh hotels and the reporters return the favor with puffy celebrity profiles and enthusiastic review blurbs. Sometimes studio executives will suggest what kind of quotes they need, and even shape the reviews to suit the studio’s goals. If a studio wants its movie pegged as “This year’s ‘Alien’,” the reviewer delivers precisely that. No one complains, and bad movies end up with great quotes. The junket troops are a mostly anonymous crowd working for obscure outlets like Wireless Magazine and Inside Reel, which helps explain why nobody—even people within Sony and Revolution—noticed that Manning was a sham. “If he doesn’t exist, he should at least have given us a better quote,” Roth joked. The Manning fabrication broke even Hollywood’s lax rules. But the real scandal is what’s considered acceptable.
Last edited:
