This Youtube Video Offers Proof That Blacks was the First To Populate Europe

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

ThaChozenWun

New member
Dark Skinned people were the first people ever. The level of darkness cant be known but dark skin was the original, all lighter and darker tones took place over evolution to help adjust, blend in, and live through the environments.

Africa people were in the sun, the dark skin helped protect against it's UV rays. The Skin tone helped those is sandy areas and forestry regions to camouflage themselves for hunting.

After man inhabited Europe, over thousands and thousands of years the skin became lighter and lighter because the sun wasn't as bad and the lighter skin suited their environment.
 
Last edited:
I dont think King James was Wesley Snipes black though, he was more like Tayshaun Prince dark with straighter hair than fully black people.
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;894004 said:
Dark Skinned people were the first people ever. The level of darkness cant be known but dark skin was the original, all lighter and darker tones took place over evolution to help adjust, blend in, and live through the environments.

Africa people were in the sun, the dark skin helped protect against it's UV rays. The Skin tone helped those is sandy areas and forestry regions to camouflage themselves for hunting.

After man inhabited Europe, over thousands and thousands of years the skin became lighter and lighter because the sun wasn't as bad and the lighter skin suited their environment.

if that is true then why arent inuit's or (eskimo's) white?
 
Last edited:
young_reezy;894015 said:
if that is true then why arent inuit's or (eskimo's) white?

I don't know. That's my belief. It's alot more acceptable and logical to me than "God created different people" or "Blacks were the first, whites were created from our scientists" or "anything not black is the devil and spawned from hell". I'm sure if I searched I could find an answer to it.

More than likely it's because while we were going through the pigmentation process, the Europeans often slept in Caves and were more of a hidden from sun type people, where as Inuits were not cave dwellers and spent time in the light. But if you really want to know I'll go research a little bit and come back with a better more accurate answer.
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;894048 said:
I don't know. That's my belief. It's alot more acceptable and logical to me than "God created different people" or "Blacks were the first, whites were created from our scientists" or "anything not black is the devil and spawned from hell". I'm sure if I searched I could find an answer to it.

More than likely it's because while we were going through the pigmentation process, the Europeans often slept in Caves and were more of a hidden from sun type people, where as Inuits were not cave dwellers and spent time in the light. But if you really want to know I'll go research a little bit and come back with a better more accurate answer.

the answer goes against that logic of climate changing their color, it was actually due to selective breeding. true they did spend time in caves but that was after they where already white.
 
Last edited:
young_reezy;894075 said:
the answer goes against that logic of climate changing their color, it was actually due to selective breeding. true they did spend time in caves but that was after they where already white.

No it doesnt. Look it up it explains it perfectly. I just checked why Inuits still remained darker skinned. And low and behold another respectable answer.

After the 140,000 some Africans began to expand, those going to Europe moved inland. They hunted animals lived out of caves and hardly ate things rich in Vitamin D. Melanin and Vitamin D work together to bring dark complexion. People who are white and take in alot of Vitamin D tend to tan rather than burn. This would explain why Native Americans, Inuits, etc.. were all still dark skinned. They ate alot of fish, fish is rich in Vitamin D which put a lot of into their system thus retaining melanin thus keeping the pigments from adapting correctly.

Since you seem to them we all started on the planet all different colors how did it start? Did god not realize this would be an issue and wanted to make people completely the same except for skin color for some reason, do you believe Ancient Israelites created white people in a lab, or do you think every white person shot up out the ground after living as lizards and snakes.

If we were all different colors since the beginning of time, how is it we all got along on tiny ass Africa for the longest until Pangaea occurred again and we migrated?
 
Last edited:
Obama's friend Louis Gates Jr. can trace his heritage to Ireland. In the first series, Gates learned of his high percentage of European ancestry due to his descent from the mulatto John Redman. In addition, he discussed findings about ancestry of his guests.[16]

In the second series of episodes, Gates learned that he is part of a genetic subgroup possibly descended from or related to the 4th-century Irish king, Niall of the Nine Hostages. He also learned that his ancestors included the Yoruba people of Nigeria.


This quote is from Ancient and Modern Britons written in 1884," The author makes it clear that some of the most ancient and important Scottish clans, including Douglass and Mac Dougall, had names that tell us that Negroes were the progenitors of these clans. The author provides us with a long list of surnames that he states were those of people with Black roots and includes King Arthur, and Alpin, founder of the royal Scottish line that includes Macbeth and Duncan, both of whom Mac Ritchie believed to be negroes. How could it be otherwise, considering that black Alpin's Black son Kenneth Mac Alpin, took a pictish bride to be the mother of his progeny? In the words of the author, 'Let it once be understood, that the picts of history were Blackamoors." Macbeth and his cousin and Victim, Duncan, were direct descendants of the Alpins."
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;894106 said:
No it doesnt. Look it up it explains it perfectly. I just checked why Inuits still remained darker skinned. And low and behold another respectable answer.

After the 140,000 some Africans began to expand, those going to Europe moved inland. They hunted animals lived out of caves and hardly ate things rich in Vitamin D. Melanin and Vitamin D work together to bring dark complexion. People who are white and take in alot of Vitamin D tend to tan rather than burn. This would explain why Native Americans, Inuits, etc.. were all still dark skinned. They ate alot of fish, fish is rich in Vitamin D which put a lot of into their system thus retaining melanin thus keeping the pigments from adapting correctly.

Since you seem to them we all started on the planet all different colors how did it start? Did god not realize this would be an issue and wanted to make people completely the same except for skin color for some reason, do you believe Ancient Israelites created white people in a lab, or do you think every white person shot up out the ground after living as lizards and snakes.

If we were all different colors since the beginning of time, how is it we all got along on tiny ass Africa for the longest until Pangaea occurred again and we migrated?

i've heard that explination before but the thing is if climate and diet were the only constructs to a group of people turning white over a vast period of time, it would still be happening.

the reason why i say selective breeding among other things is because if a white person and their off spring continues to interbreed with dark skinned people from africa, their off spring would no longer be white.
 
Last edited:
young_reezy;894137 said:
i've heard that explination before but the thing is if climate and diet were the only constructs to a group of people turning white over a vast period of time, it would still be happening.

the reason why i say selective breeding among other things is because if a white person and their off spring continues to interbreed with dark skinned people from africa, their off spring would no longer be white.

Andddd...... You have millions and millions of people in the world white light skin who have dark skinned traits? I doubt it was selective breeding at first. We were all black, maybe not hella dark but our skin was dark. Our ancestors moved throughout the world during pangea. Once we moved around, it took a long time but the giant group of land separated. Thus groups were divided. Over another 100,000 years generations wouldn't remember, oh we used to be black. So when we learned to build ships and travel because suddenly we found out the Earth wasn't flat and we wouldn't fall off by traveling the seal, we began to reacquaint. The problem now was evolution of pigments has begun to run its course and people began having different skin tones. People at that time had no clue about Melanin or Vitamin's, they thought a god created everyone different. Christianity preached the white man was god. Certain sectors of Islam claim god is black. It all came to that point and then selective breeding took place.

Africa - Black, A lot of sun = Melanin remaining + 9 Ether hair
Europe - White began to start, blacks were still on the southern parts. Earliest peoples who began to have lighter pigments mated with those who had large amounts of melanin. That in turn is what some modern Arabs are. Darker skin + straight hair.
North America - Had fish not been a main entree, had they not had loads of Vitamin D to counter that change, they would be black as Africans. They had a slight pigment change but retained a good bit Melanin through eating certain Vitamins. Thus you get darker Native Americans, but alot have straight hair.
South America - Inhabited by first blacks like everywhere else. Those outside of the forests were in high temperatures and sunlight, remained dark. Jungles were very hot and wet, they retained Melanin to combat this. South Americans = Dark Skin, 9 Ether hair strands.

And it is still happening. Ill go look it up n post it but I read a study somewhere a few months ago that showed over the last 50 years Blacks in Europe were beginning to lose percentages of Melanin and the White people in Africa were gaining Melanin. It was only like a 0.4% change, but thats only a 50 year period. The rate may still be the same, it may be slowed down. One factor to it slowing down is because we have adapted and dont need to rapidly change any longer. If you put a white girl in a tanning bed every week from the time she's 10 til the time shes 30 her skin will begin to naturally be darker and darker.

Obviously the Evolution theory has things that you can question, their may be answers better explaining what I'm trying to. Not an expert in the field or claim to be. But to me there is no other explanation that seems logical to me. If you think from the very beginning we were all different skin tones I'd like to know why you think this, and what you theory is on how it started.

If God just placed us all here separatly, how come we didn't fight over skin color like we do now. Why are their no depictions of white colored skin in African paintings until far after Europeans began to turn lighter?
 
Last edited:
we just have different views on this particular subject, has nothing to do with the thread (side-tracked) dope thread tho
 
Last edited:
Ostrogoths
Visigoths
Vandals
Huns
Franks
Lombards
Anglos
+Saxons
----------------------
PALE EUROPE
 
Last edited:
So the drawing of a queen with black features and a book that says King James was a descendant of the tribe of Judah is proof that he was black?

So all the paintings and memoirs of his contemporaries in Britian and Europe that depict him as a white man are not valid?

This is almost as bad as Phil Valentine saying Islam was started by the Catholic Church and basing it off a christian fundamentalist comic book. I understand Time Square Hebrews want to justify the King James Bible they use but this is too much.

Ghetto scholarship........when will it end.
 
Last edited:
And Step;894853 said:
So the drawing of a queen with black features and a book that says King James was a descendant of the tribe of Judah is proof that he was black?

So all the paintings and memoirs of his contemporaries in Britian and Europe that depict him as a white man are not valid?

This is almost as bad as Phil Valentine saying Islam was started by the Catholic Church and basing it off a christian fundamentalist comic book. I understand Time Square Hebrews want to justify the King James Bible they use but this is too much.

Ghetto scholarship........when will it end.

LOL....even if he was black he was on that bullshit.
 
Last edited:
And Step;894853 said:
So the drawing of a queen with black features and a book that says King James was a descendant of the tribe of Judah is proof that he was black?

So all the paintings and memoirs of his contemporaries in Britian and Europe that depict him as a white man are not valid?

This is almost as bad as Phil Valentine saying Islam was started by the Catholic Church and basing it off a christian fundamentalist comic book. I understand Time Square Hebrews want to justify the King James Bible they use but this is too much.

Ghetto scholarship........when will it end.

Well, well...we finally agree. lol.
 
Last edited:
stillmatic_01;895195 said:
he looks like that Muslim dude from the Oz

Judah, you my dude, but I am sorry, they got you.

Marcus Vick, Loon, Sayid, and Treach? Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
 
Last edited:
oliverlang;895809 said:
Well, well...we finally agree. lol.

We agree on a lot of things. I dont disagree with most of what you say, I just disagree with your time frame of reference. You perceive things how they should be. But Time is past, present, and future tense. I contend our future depends on how well we deal with current realities.

The points we disagree on just usually dominate the convo. Particularly, when I am spanking that ass...............................what?
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;894212 said:
. Certain sectors of Islam claim god is black. It all came to that point and then selective breeding took place.

I don't know of any such sectors except for one. Most of the Muslim world doesn't even identify God as a man, even though they apply masculine attributes to him. And if your talking of Elijah Muhammad's theological premise. He said God was Black, but more importantly he said he was a man. He said the white man was a god too. Man is the conduit. God can manifest in any flesh. Knowledge, Wisdom, Understanding, and the Power to execute makes one God.

A etheral wisp of smoke never taught me anything of value.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
65
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…