Rampage12;8081559 said:
sobek;8081551 said:
Rampage12;8081376 said:
sobek;8080772 said:
Rampage12;8075515 said:
sobek;8075328 said:
Rampage12;8072983 said:
Y'all just gonna have to accept the fact Weidman is the new Middleweight GOAT.
Him beating the Brazilian version of Larry Holmes hardly did anything to solidify his legitimacy as champ and silence the critics. Ain't nothing GOAT about Weidman yet.
But Anderson ruled a very weak, thin division at Middleweight, his best win was probably Dan Henderson in the grand scheme of things and then he would "courageously" move up to Light Heavyweight and fight the likes of James Irvin and Stephan Bonnar, I'll give him props for his win over Forrest Griffin even though Forrest was wacked out on Xanax during that fight.
So no credit for knocking out Rich Franklin twice and no credit for knocking out a dangerous Vitor, but you'll give Weidman full credit and call him the new middleweight GOAT after beating a TRT deprived Vitor who is a shell of himself without it? Aight, bruh.
I'd agree overall with the weakness of middleweight division even though it ain't all that now either, imo. That's one of the reasons I thought Silva and Jones really shouldn't even be compared. Silva's my favorite fighter of all time, but Jones beat a who's who of killers in the LHW division. As impressive as a 7 year reign as champion is, Jones' resume is more impressive, imo. Which also goes back to my earlier comment about the gassed up, delusion surrounding Weidman when he blasphemously refereed to the idea of a fight between him and Jones as a "Super fight".
I think Silva has beaten four MMA Hall of Fame fighters if such a thing existed; Franklin, Belfort, Hendo, and Griffin (borderline but he was the Light Heavyweight champ even though he never defended the belt). But he also looked terrible/disinterested in many of those (Cote, Leites, Maia, Sonnen I). The likes of James Irvin are now competing in hybrid arm-wrestling/MMA bouts (who knew there was such a thing).
Whereas Weidman has beaten three MMA Hall of Famers in my opinion, is still only 30, has never lost, and has never been popped for 'roids. When Silva was the age Weidman is right now he was still getting flying scissor heel hooked by the likes of Ryo Chonan. What I'm saying is Weidman still has ample time to overtake The Spider's legacy.
Yes, but most people would agree that Wiedman beat 2 of those 3 hall of famers under questionable circumstances. Granted, he had zero control regarding the situations of Silva clowning around in the first fight before getting KO'd, his leg breaking in the second fight, and Vitor being off the juice as he shouldn't be allowed to get away with cheating anyway.
But, Vitor looked nowhere near his prime in that fight. Everything from his weaker, and some-what flabby looking body to his lack of signature explosiveness, Vitor looked like an old man in comparison to Weidman. Would the TRT version of Vitor had gone out like that? Would a 30 year old Vitor had gone out like that? Highly unlikely. These are still things which will be held over his head by some until he starts defeating respectable talent without controversy as champion.
I'm not writing him off in terms of talent or potential, but I just feel he needs more undeniably credible wins under his belt as champion to come anywhere near GOAT status, imo.
-Bruh, Vitor Belfort has had the reputation of quitting when things weren't going his way since Randy Couture whipped his ass at UFC 15. He loves being the hammer but hates being the nail if you will. He reminds me alot of his teammate Rumble in that sense.
-Silva has clowned in nearly all of his fights, it's just that Weidman was the only one who hadn't already been defeated before he walked into the cage and wasn't scared of Silva and was good enough to capitalize on it.
I agree, but there's no denying that the Vitor who had that 3 fight win streak, the Vitor who fought Anderson, The Vitor who subbed Rumble, and the Vitor who almost subbed Jones was anything like the same person who lost to Weidman.
As far as Anderson goes, yes, he showboats every fight. But the difference, imo is that he completely overlooked and disrespected Weidman's ability which obviously was a big mistake considering what he had already accomplished before that fight even took place. In other words, Silva's god complex finally bit him in the ass.
Granted he doesn't have power like Weidman, but if Silva had approached the first fight with Chael the same way, Chael quite possibly could've ended up being champ. Silva took that fight way more seriously because it was personal, even though he still got his ass beat up on the ground.
And I'm not questioning Weidman's entire undefeated record. I'm questioning the legitimacy of his wins since winning the title because of the controversial circumstances which have surrounded them, and his right to be considered a GOAT this prematurely in his championship run.